Saturday, September 7, 2024
HomeArtificial IntelligenceAI-As-A-Service Providers Vulnerability Let Attackers Perform Cross-Tenant Attacks

AI-As-A-Service Providers Vulnerability Let Attackers Perform Cross-Tenant Attacks

Published on

The fast acceptance of AI has serious security issues, as this necessitates strict security measures to be put in place for the protection of sensitive information within shared cloud AI infrastructure.

Wiz Research, a cybersecurity firm, in collaboration with AI-as-a-Service firms, recently discovered some common security flaws across the sector that could expose users’ personal data and models.

The implications of these findings have to be taken seriously considering AI services are now available in more than 70% of cloud environments.

- Advertisement - EHA

AI-As-A-Service Providers Vulnerability

Malicious models pose a severe threat, enabling cross-tenant attacks and access to millions of private AI models and apps within AI-as-a-service providers. Wiz uncovered critical risks in Hugging Face’s environment:-

  • Shared inference infrastructure takeover risk via untrusted pickle-serialized models with potential remote code execution payloads.
  • Shared CI/CD takeover risk through malicious AI applications compromising the pipeline for supply chain attacks.

When securing AI/ML systems, several factors, such as the AI model being used, the application code that uses the model, and the inference infrastructure deploying the model, must be taken into account.

AI-As-A-Service Providers Vulnerability (Source -Wiz)

Malicious people can use various methods to attack each component, including malicious input for models, insecure application code that processes the results of a model, and pickled models that compromise inference infrastructures. 

This involves downloading unreliable AI models, similar to embedding untrustworthy codes into applications.

Hugging Face research team focused on isolation flaws in AI-as-a-service setups, examining the company’s major products: 

  • Inference API
  • Inference Endpoints
  • Spaces
Inference API (Source -Wiz)

However, Hugging Face’s analysis and warnings of insecure Pickle-based PyTorch models still allow inferring potentially malicious models. 

On the other hand, researchers developed a harmful PyTorch model that runs arbitrary code when loaded and remotely executes code by using Inference API to interact with it.

Researchers achieved shell-like functionality by hooking into Hugging Face’s post-deserialization inference results management code.

This demonstrates how untrusted AI models in shared compute services are at great risk due to inadequate isolation.

As a result of gaining a reverse shell through the Hugging Face Inference API, researchers realized that they were inside one pod within an Amazon EKS Kubernetes cluster.

They exploited common misconfigurations like querying the node’s IMDS to get the node role and cluster name via AWS permissions.

With node role privileges, these people got access to pod information as well as secrets that brought to light the risks of lateral movement and data leakage.

Moreover, it also executed code by using a malicious Dockerfile in Hugging Face Spaces, which demonstrated potential supply chain attack vectors caused by network isolation issues in the container registry. 

Researchers urged to allow IMDSv2 with Hop limits, apply tighter access controls, and impose authentication measures for securing shared AI environment.

Secure your emails in a heartbeat! Take Trustifi free 30-second assessment and get matched with your ideal email security vendor - Try Here
Tushar Subhra
Tushar Subhra
Tushar is a Cyber security content editor with a passion for creating captivating and informative content. With years of experience under his belt in Cyber Security, he is covering Cyber Security News, technology and other news.

Latest articles

BBTok Abuses Legitimate Windows Utility Command Tool to Stay Undetected

Cybercriminals in Latin America have increased their use of phishing scams targeting business transactions...

Predator Spyware Exploiting “one-click” & “zero-click” Flaws

Recent research indicates that the Predator spyware, once thought to be inactive due to...

Tropic Trooper Attacks Government Organizations to Steal Sensitive Data

Tropic Trooper (aka KeyBoy, Pirate Panda, and APT23) is a sophisticated cyberespionage APT group,...

NoiseAttack is a Novel Backdoor That Uses Power Spectral Density For Evasion

NoiseAttack is a new method of secretly attacking deep learning models. It uses triggers...

Free Webinar

Decoding Compliance | What CISOs Need to Know

Non-compliance can result in substantial financial penalties, with average fines reaching up to $4.5 million for GDPR breaches alone.

Join us for an insightful panel discussion with Chandan Pani, CISO - LTIMindtree and Ashish Tandon, Founder & CEO – Indusface, as we explore the multifaceted role of compliance in securing modern enterprises.

Discussion points

The Role of Compliance
The Alphabet Soup of Compliance
Compliance
SaaS and Compliance
Indusface's Approach to Compliance

More like this

BBTok Abuses Legitimate Windows Utility Command Tool to Stay Undetected

Cybercriminals in Latin America have increased their use of phishing scams targeting business transactions...

Predator Spyware Exploiting “one-click” & “zero-click” Flaws

Recent research indicates that the Predator spyware, once thought to be inactive due to...

Tropic Trooper Attacks Government Organizations to Steal Sensitive Data

Tropic Trooper (aka KeyBoy, Pirate Panda, and APT23) is a sophisticated cyberespionage APT group,...