Thursday, March 28, 2024

APT15 Hackers Using Steganography Technique to Drop Okrum Backdoor Via PNG File to Evade Detection

Researchers discovered a previously unseen malware called Okrum that distributed from APT15 threat group via a hidden PNG file with steganography technique to evade detection.

APT15 threat group also known as Ke3chang has a long history of its malicious activities since 2010, and it was initially reported in 2013 during their campaign activity attack organization in Europe.

Okrum backdoor initially detected in December 2016 that targets various countries such as Slovakia, Belgium, Chile, Guatemala and Brazil and is believed to be operating out of China.

Okrum backdoor initially detected in December 2016 that targets various countries such as Slovakia, Belgium, Chile, Guatemala Brazil and is believed to be operating out of China.

The APT group continues to be active in 2019 to attack the same type of target but were using different malicious toolsets to compromise them.

Okrum has a similar modus operandi as previously documented Ke3chang (APT15)malware family with a basic set of backdoor commands.

Okrum Distribution and infection vector By APT15

Threat actors from APT15 hiding the okrum payload within a PNG file and infect the victim’s machine using steganography technique stay unnoticed and evade detection.

Attackers tried to hide malicious traffic with its C&C server within the normal traffic by registering the legitimate domain names.

Okrum backdoor installed and loaded by 2 different components which is frequently changed by malware authors to avoid detection.

According to ESET research, “Okrum is only equipped with basic backdoor commands, such as downloading and uploading files, executing files and shell commands. Most of the malicious activity has to be performed by typing shell commands manually, or by executing other tools and software”

“Researchers believe that the combination of simple backdoor and external tools fully accommodates their needs while being easier to develop, but it may also be an attempt to evade behavioral detection.”

Along with this, researchers discovered some of the external tools such as keylogger, tools for dumping passwords, or enumerating network sessions.

Based on the telemetry data, Threat actors employed various anti-emulation and anti-sandbox technique to avoid detection and it mainly targeting Slovakia, Belgium, Chile, Guatemala, and Brazil, Slovakia.

You can follow us on Linkedin, Twitter, Facebook for daily Cybersecurity updates also you can take the Best Cybersecurity course online to keep yourself updated.

Also Read:

Chinese APT’s New Malware MirageFox Launch Cyber Attack on Government & Military Sectors

Hackers using steganography to Drop the Powload Malware & Hide Their Malvertising Traffic

Website

Latest articles

GoPlus’s Latest Report Highlights How Blockchain Communities Are Leveraging Critical API Security Data To Mitigate Web3 Threats

GoPlus Labs, the leading Web3 security infrastructure provider, has unveiled a groundbreaking report highlighting...

Wireshark 4.2.4 Released: What’s New!

Wireshark stands as the undisputed leader, offering unparalleled tools for troubleshooting, analysis, development, and...

Zoom Unveils AI-Powered All-In-One AI Work Workplace

Zoom has taken a monumental leap forward by introducing Zoom Workplace, an all-encompassing AI-powered...

iPhone Users Beware! Darcula Phishing Service Attacking Via iMessage

Phishing allows hackers to exploit human vulnerabilities and trick users into revealing sensitive information...

2 Chrome Zero-Days Exploited at Pwn2Own 2024: Patch Now

Google has announced a crucial update to its Chrome browser, addressing several vulnerabilities, including...

The Moon Malware Hacked 6,000 ASUS Routers in 72hours to Use for Proxy

Black Lotus Labs discovered a multi-year campaign by TheMoon malware targeting vulnerable routers and...
Balaji
Balaji
BALAJI is an Ex-Security Researcher (Threat Research Labs) at Comodo Cybersecurity. Editor-in-Chief & Co-Founder - Cyber Security News & GBHackers On Security.

Mitigating Vulnerability Types & 0-day Threats

Mitigating Vulnerability & 0-day Threats

Alert Fatigue that helps no one as security teams need to triage 100s of vulnerabilities.

  • The problem of vulnerability fatigue today
  • Difference between CVSS-specific vulnerability vs risk-based vulnerability
  • Evaluating vulnerabilities based on the business impact/risk
  • Automation to reduce alert fatigue and enhance security posture significantly

Related Articles