Cyber Security News

BlueNoroff: New Malware Attacking MacOS Users

Researchers have uncovered a new Trojan-attacking macOS user that is associated with the BlueNoroff APT group and their ongoing RustBucket campaign. 

As a subgroup of Lazarus, BlueNoroff possesses reverse engineering expertise because they spend time analyzing and patching SWIFT Alliance software as well as breaking apart legitimate software to uncover ways to steal a significant amount of money.

This financially driven threat actor targets ATMs, POST software and cryptocurrency businesses, banks, casinos, and fin-tech organizations. Major financial attacks, such as the theft of the Bangladesh Central Bank, were associated with this actor.

BlueNoroff Targeting macOS Users

The new loader variation was initially mentioned in a post on X (formerly Twitter).

The new loader variation mentioned on X

A malicious payload was disseminated via earlier RustBucket versions using an app that pretended to be a PDF viewer. 

According to Kaspersky, this new type was discovered within a ZIP package containing a PDF file with the title “Crypto-assets and their risks for financial stability,” and a thumbnail of the matching title page.

App Structure

According to researchers, it’s unclear exactly how the archive spread. The targets may have received an email from the criminals, similar to previous attacks. At the time of discovery, the app’s signature was still valid, but the certificate has since expired. 

“EdoneViewer,” an executable in universal format with versions for Apple and Intel silicon chips, was written in Swift. The main function, CalculateExtameGCD, is responsible for decrypting the XOR-encrypted payload. 

The app attempts to reduce the analyst’s attention by sending irrelevant notifications to the terminal while the decryption procedure is underway.

The .pw file is a Trojan that was discovered; it is a universal format file, just like the loader. The file collects and communicates to the C&C the following system information:

  • Computer name
  • OS version
  • Time zone
  • Device startup date
  • OS installation date
  • Current time
  • List of running processes

In response, the Trojan expects one of three commands:

However, during the investigation, researchers did not get a single command from the server, which prevented them from learning the content for the next attack phase. Right now, the majority of anti-malware programs can identify the Trojan.

Guru baran

Gurubaran is a co-founder of Cyber Security News and GBHackers On Security. He has 10+ years of experience as a Security Consultant, Editor, and Analyst in cybersecurity, technology, and communications.

Recent Posts

Hackers Exploiting Docusign With Phishing Attack To Steal Credentials

Hackers prefer phishing as it exploits human vulnerabilities rather than technical flaws which make it a highly effective and low-cost…

8 hours ago

Norway Recommends Replacing SSLVPN/WebVPN to Stop Cyber Attacks

A very important message from the Norwegian National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) says that Secure Socket Layer/Transport Layer Security (SSL/TLS)…

2 days ago

New Linux Backdoor Attacking Linux Users Via Installation Packages

Linux is widely used in numerous servers, cloud infrastructure, and Internet of Things devices, which makes it an attractive target…

2 days ago

ViperSoftX Malware Uses Deep Learning Model To Execute Commands

ViperSoftX malware, known for stealing cryptocurrency information, now leverages Tesseract, an open-source OCR engine, to target infected systems, which extracts…

2 days ago

Santander Data Breach: Hackers Accessed Company Database

Santander has confirmed that there was a major data breach that affected its workers and customers in Spain, Uruguay, and…

2 days ago

U.S. Govt Announces Rewards up to $5 Million for North Korean IT Workers

The U.S. government has offered a prize of up to $5 million for information that leads to the arrest and…

2 days ago