BlueNoroff: New Malware Attacking MacOS Users

Researchers have uncovered a new Trojan-attacking macOS user that is associated with the BlueNoroff APT group and their ongoing RustBucket campaign. 

As a subgroup of Lazarus, BlueNoroff possesses reverse engineering expertise because they spend time analyzing and patching SWIFT Alliance software as well as breaking apart legitimate software to uncover ways to steal a significant amount of money.

This financially driven threat actor targets ATMs, POST software and cryptocurrency businesses, banks, casinos, and fin-tech organizations. Major financial attacks, such as the theft of the Bangladesh Central Bank, were associated with this actor.

BlueNoroff Targeting macOS Users

The new loader variation was initially mentioned in a post on X (formerly Twitter).

The new loader variation mentioned on X

A malicious payload was disseminated via earlier RustBucket versions using an app that pretended to be a PDF viewer. 

According to Kaspersky, this new type was discovered within a ZIP package containing a PDF file with the title “Crypto-assets and their risks for financial stability,” and a thumbnail of the matching title page.

App Structure

According to researchers, it’s unclear exactly how the archive spread. The targets may have received an email from the criminals, similar to previous attacks. At the time of discovery, the app’s signature was still valid, but the certificate has since expired. 

“EdoneViewer,” an executable in universal format with versions for Apple and Intel silicon chips, was written in Swift. The main function, CalculateExtameGCD, is responsible for decrypting the XOR-encrypted payload. 

The app attempts to reduce the analyst’s attention by sending irrelevant notifications to the terminal while the decryption procedure is underway.

The .pw file is a Trojan that was discovered; it is a universal format file, just like the loader. The file collects and communicates to the C&C the following system information:

  • Computer name
  • OS version
  • Time zone
  • Device startup date
  • OS installation date
  • Current time
  • List of running processes

In response, the Trojan expects one of three commands:

However, during the investigation, researchers did not get a single command from the server, which prevented them from learning the content for the next attack phase. Right now, the majority of anti-malware programs can identify the Trojan.

Gurubaran

Gurubaran is a co-founder of Cyber Security News and GBHackers On Security. He has 10+ years of experience as a Security Consultant, Editor, and Analyst in cybersecurity, technology, and communications.

Recent Posts

Hackers Use ConnectWise SkyKick Credentials to Access Microsoft 365, Halting Cloud Backups

Attackers abused compromised ConnectWise Cloud Backup credentials to access Microsoft 365 customer environments, prompting ConnectWise…

22 hours ago

Anthropic’s Claude AI Uncovers Origins of NSA-Provided Cryptographic Keys After 25 Years

Anthropic says an internal Claude research model reconstructed how the National Security Agency generated seeds…

1 day ago

Critical WordPress Flaws Allow Attackers to Execute Remote Code Without Authentication

Two WordPress Core vulnerabilities can be chained to execute remote code without authentication, according to…

1 day ago

OpenBSD Kernel Flaw Dating Back 37 Years Enables Local Privilege Escalation to Root

A newly disclosed OpenBSD kernel exploitation chain combines a shared memory accounting flaw with a…

1 day ago

GhostAction Hackers Hide Credential-Stealing Malware in Fake Font Files Across 94 GitHub Repositories

GhostAction attackers have expanded their GitHub credential theft campaign with a second stage that disguises…

1 day ago

SideCopy Hackers Target Indian Organizations With ReverseRAT Malware to Steal Data

Indian authorities have warned that SideCopy hackers are targeting Indian organizations, including academic institutions, with…

1 day ago