Tuesday, April 16, 2024

BLURtooth – A new Vulnerability Let Attackers to Overwrite the Authentication Keys

Security researchers from at the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) and Purdue University discovered vulnerabilities related to Cross-Transport Key Derivation (CTKD) with Bluetooth BR/EDR and LE in Bluetooth Specifications 4.0 through 5.0.

Bluetooth BR/EDR and LE that using Cross-Transport Key Derivation (CTKD) are vulnerable to key overwrite which allows attackers to gain additional access to profiles by reducing the encryption strength.

BLURtooth Attack

According to the specifications of 4.2 and 5.0 Bluetooth versions, CTKD is used for pairing by devices that support both Low Energy (BLE) and Basic Rate/Enhanced Data Rate (BR/EDR) transport methods.

By using the CTKD it let devices pair once by using the transport method while generating both the BR/EDR and LE Long Term Keys (LTK) without needing to pair a second time.

To launch a successful attack the device should reside within the wireless range of a vulnerable Bluetooth device supporting both BR/EDR and LE transports that support CTKD between the transports and permits pairing on either the BR/EDR or LE transport either with no authentication or no user-controlled access.

The vulnerability can be tracked as CVE-2020-15802, it is referred to as BLURtooth and the group of attacks is being referred to as the BLUR attacks.

Bluetooth SIG recommends additional conformance tests for authentication keys, disallow overwrite of the LTK, or LK.

The Bluetooth SIG further recommends that devices restrict when they are pairable on either transport to times when user interaction places the device into a pairable mode or when the device has no bonds or existing connections to a paired device.

Bluetooth users are recommended to have installed the latest updates from the device and operating system manufacturers.

You can follow us on LinkedinTwitterFacebook for daily Cybersecurity updates

Also Read:

Google Maps XSS Bug – Bounty Doubled After the Original Fix had Failed

New Jenkins Vulnerability Let Hackers Steal Sensitive Information By Obtain HTTP Response Headers


Latest articles

Trustifi’s Email Security Awareness Training – Empowering MSPs to Train & Protect Clients

In today's digital landscape, email security has become a critical concern for businesses of...

Personal Data Exposed in Massive Global Hack: Understanding the Implications & Guarding Privacy- Axios Security Group

In a digital age where information is the new currency, the recent global hack...

Ex-Security Engineer Jailed For Hacking Decentralized Cryptocurrency Exchanges

Ahmed exploited a vulnerability in a decentralized cryptocurrency exchange's smart contract by injecting fabricated...

Omni Hotels & Resorts Hack: Attackers have Stolen Customer Information

Omni Hotels & Resorts has revealed that it was the target of a recent...

Connect:fun Attacking Organizations Running Fortinet’s FortiClient EMS

A new exploit campaign has emerged, targeting organizations that utilize Fortinet’s FortiClient EMS.Dubbed...

TA558 Hackers Compromised 320+ Organizations’ FTP & SMTP Servers

TA558, a financially motivated threat actor identified in 2018, is targeting several countries but...

Blackjack Hackers Destroyed 87,000 Sensors Using Lethal ICS Malware

A group of cybercriminals known as "Blackjack" has launched a devastating attack on industrial...
Guru baran
Guru baranhttps://gbhackers.com
Gurubaran is a co-founder of Cyber Security News and GBHackers On Security. He has 10+ years of experience as a Security Consultant, Editor, and Analyst in cybersecurity, technology, and communications.

Top 3 SME Attack Vectors

Securing the Top 3 SME Attack Vectors

Cybercriminals are laying siege to small-to-medium enterprises (SMEs) across sectors. 73% of SMEs know they were breached in 2023. The real rate could be closer to 100%.

  • Stolen credentials
  • Phishing
  • Exploitation of vulnerabilities

Related Articles