Monday, March 4, 2024

In-depth Analysis of Certificate Transparency – Detect Fake SSL Certificates

Certificate Transparency aims at increasing safety with TLS certificates. Most importantly CT was put in the place to defend mis-issuance.

Certificate Transparency aims to remedy these certificate-based threats by making the issuance and existence of SSL certificates open to scrutiny by domain owners, CA, and domain users. Specifically, Certificate Transparency has three main goals:

Also Read: Fast and Complete SSL Scanner to Find Mis-configurations affecting TLS/SSL Severs-A Detailed Analysis

Certificate Logs

Certificate logs are simple network services that maintain cryptographically assured, publicly auditable, append-only records of certificates. Anyone can submit certificates to a log, although certificate authorities will likely be the foremost submitters.

Likewise, anyone can query a log for a cryptographic proof, which can be used to verify that the log is behaving properly or verify that a particular certificate has been logged.

The number of log servers doesn’t have to be large (say, much less than a thousand worldwide), and each could be operated independently by a CA, an ISP, or any other interested party.


Monitors are publicly run servers that periodically contact all of the log servers and watch for suspicious certificates.

For example, monitors can tell if an illegitimate or unauthorized certificate has been issued for a domain, and they can watch for certificates that have unusual certificate extensions or strange permissions, such as certificates that have CA capabilities.

A monitor acts much the same way as a credit-reporting alert, which tells you whenever someone applies for a loan or credit card in your name. Some monitors will be run by companies and organizations, such as Google, or a bank, or a government.

Others will be run as subscription services that domain owners and certificate authorities can buy into. Tech-savvy individuals can run their own monitors.



Auditors are lightweight software components that typically perform two functions. First, they can verify that logs are behaving correctly and are cryptographically consistent.

If a log is not behaving properly, then the log will need to explain itself or risk being shut down. Second, they can verify that a particular certificate appears in a log.
This is a particularly important auditing function because the Certificate Transparency framework requires that all SSL certificates be registered in a log. If a certificate has not been registered in a log, it’s a sign that the certificate is suspect, and TLS clients may refuse to connect to sites that have suspect certificates.

How Certificate Transparency works?

Components of Certificate Transparency 

  1. Certificate Authorities CA (Comodo, DigiCert, Verisign, Thawte)
  2. Log Servers that act as public repositories for the certificate records.
  3. The browsers of any client accepting certificates (they act as auditors)
  4. Publicly run servers that monitor newly added certificate logs to check for mis-issuances

The following occurs when a CA logs a certificate:

  1. The CA creates what is called a “pre-certificate,” which contains the SSL Certificate’s information. The CA then sends this pre-certificate to its trusted Log server.
  2. The Log server then accepts this information and returns a “signed certificate timestamp” or SCT. The SCT essentially promises to log the certificate within a certain period of time. This time frame is known as the Maximum Merge Delay or MMD—it may never exceed 24 hours.
  1. The SCT is then accepted by the CA and added to the body of the SSL Certificate (or sometimes presented by other means). The SCT’s presence is, itself, a signal that the certificate has been published in a CT log.

There are three ways for an SCT to be delivered with the SSL Certificate:

  • X509v3 Extension
  • TLS Extension
  • OCSP Stapling

Advantages of Certificate Transparency

  • Early detection of misissued certificates, malicious certificates, and rogue CAs.
  • Faster mitigation after suspect certificates or CAs is detected.
  • Better oversight of the entire TLS/SSL system.

Latest articles

New Silver SAML Attack Let Attackers Forge Any SAML Response To Entra ID

SolarWinds cyberattack was one of the largest attacks of the century in which attackers...

AI Worm Developed by Researchers Spreads Automatically Between AI Agents

Researchers have developed what they claim to be one of the first generative AI...

20 Million+ Cutout.Pro User Records Leaked On Hacking Forums

CutOut.Pro, an AI-powered photo and video editing platform, has reportedly suffered a data breach,...

CWE Version 4.14 Released: What’s New!

The Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) project, a cornerstone in the cybersecurity landscape, has unveiled...

RisePro Stealer Attacks Windows Users Steals Sensitive Data

A new wave of cyber threats has emerged as the RisePro information stealer targets...

Golden Corral Restaurant Chain Hacked: 180,000+ Users’ Data Stolen

The Golden Corral Corporation, a popular American restaurant chain, has suffered a significant data...

CISA Warns Of Hackers Exploiting Multiple Flaws In Ivanti VPN

Threat actors target and abuse VPN flaws because VPNs are often used to secure...
Guru baran
Guru baran
Gurubaran is a co-founder of Cyber Security News and GBHackers On Security. He has 10+ years of experience as a Security Consultant, Editor, and Analyst in cybersecurity, technology, and communications.

Live Account Takeover Attack Simulation

Live Account Take Over Attack

Live Webinar on How do hackers bypass 2FA ,Detecting ATO attacks, A demo of credential stuffing, brute force and session jacking-based ATO attacks, Identifying attacks with behaviour-based analysis and Building custom protection for applications and APIs.

Related Articles