Monday, February 10, 2025
HomeComputer SecurityChinese Naikon APT Group Compromises Government Servers to Evade Detection and to...

Chinese Naikon APT Group Compromises Government Servers to Evade Detection and to Launch other Attacks

Published on

SIEM as a Service

Follow Us on Google News

A Chinese based Naikon APT group discovered attacking several national government entities in the Asia Pacific (APAC) region.

The ongoing cyber-espionage campaign discovered by Checkpoint researchers that persistently targeting the same region since 2015.

Naikon APT Group

The campaign actively targets entities such as foreign affairs, science, and technology ministries, as well as government-owned companies.

Researchers believe that this group is to “gather intelligence and spy on the countries whose Governments it has targeted.”

The group aimed to extract information from computers and networks within government departments. removable drives, taking screenshots, and keylogging.

It was observed that the APT group compromises the government entity and use the compromised entity to attack another government entity.

Attackers use several infection chains to deliver the Aria-body backdoor to establish a persistent presence on the target’s network.

Researchers observed that “Aria-body backdoor variants being compiled as early as 2018, we have observed Aria-body’s loaders going back to 2017.” The functionality of the loader was not changed since 2017, but attackers made changes with its implementation methods.

The next stage of the loader is the RAT dubbed Aria-body, that includes various modules such as USB data gathering, Keylogger module, Reverse socks proxy module, and Loading extensions module.

APT Group Infrastructure

The attacker group uses GoDaddy as the registrar and Alibaba for hosting the infrastructure, here is the complete infrastructure overview.

Attackers also used hacked government infrastructure as C&C servers, “researchers IP which belongs to the Philippines department of science and technology used for backup C&C server.”

Infrastructre

The communication between the C&C server handled by either HTTP or TCP protocols, the data to the C&C server sent along with the XORed password, and the XOR key.

C&C Communication

“We were able to attribute our campaign to the Naikon APT group using several similarities we observed to the previously disclosed information about Naikon’s activity by Kaspersky in 2015,” researchers said.

Both the Aria-body backdoor and XsFunction backdoor found to be identical and they also found to be using the same Infrastructure.

Naikon APT group flying under the radar for more than five-years by utilizing new server infrastructure, ever-changing loader variants, in-memory fileless loading, as well as a new backdoor.

You can follow us on Linkedin, Twitter, Facebook for daily Cybersecurity and hacking news updates.

Gurubaran
Gurubaran
Gurubaran is a co-founder of Cyber Security News and GBHackers On Security. He has 10+ years of experience as a Security Consultant, Editor, and Analyst in cybersecurity, technology, and communications.

Latest articles

SHA256 Hash Calculation from Data Chunks

The SHA256 algorithm, a cryptographic hash function, is widely used for securing data integrity...

New Report of of 1M+ Malware Samples Show Application Layer Abused for Stealthy C2

A recent analysis of over one million malware samples by Picus Security has revealed...

Seven-Year-Old Linux Kernel Bug Opens Door to Remote Code Execution

Researchers have uncovered a critical vulnerability in the Linux kernel, dating back seven years,...

Ransomware Payments Plunge 35% as More Victims Refuse to Pay

In a significant shift within the ransomware landscape, global ransom payments plummeted by 35%...

Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Free Webinar - Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Recent attacks like Polyfill[.]io show how compromised third-party components become backdoors for hackers. PCI DSS 4.0’s Requirement 6.4.3 mandates stricter browser script controls, while Requirement 12.8 focuses on securing third-party providers.

Join Vivekanand Gopalan (VP of Products – Indusface) and Phani Deepak Akella (VP of Marketing – Indusface) as they break down these compliance requirements and share strategies to protect your applications from supply chain attacks.

Discussion points

Meeting PCI DSS 4.0 mandates.
Blocking malicious components and unauthorized JavaScript execution.
PIdentifying attack surfaces from third-party dependencies.
Preventing man-in-the-browser attacks with proactive monitoring.

More like this

New Report of of 1M+ Malware Samples Show Application Layer Abused for Stealthy C2

A recent analysis of over one million malware samples by Picus Security has revealed...

NanoCore RAT Attack Windows Using Task Scheduler to Captures keystrokes, screenshots

NanoCore, a notorious Remote Access Trojan (RAT), continues to pose a significant threat to...

Cybercriminals Target IIS Servers to Spread BadIIS Malware

A recent wave of cyberattacks has revealed the exploitation of Microsoft Internet Information Services...