Thursday, March 28, 2024

Turla Group Updated ComRAT Malware to Use Gmail web Interface for Command and Control

The ComRAT malware is a remote administration tool and is used by the Turla hacker group. It was first spotted in November 2014. The Trula hacker group is active for more than ten years.

ComRAT malware also known as Agent.BTZ, the first version of it was released in 2007. It becomes infamous after it was used to breach the US military in 2008.

Turla’s operators known for maintaining a large arsenal of malware includes a rootkit, several complex backdoors aimed at different platforms, including Microsoft Exchange mail servers, and a large range of tools to enable pivoting on a network.

ComRAT Malware

A new variant of ComRAT malware found by researchers in 2017 and it is active as recently as January 2020. Three targets were identified; two of them are ministries of Foreign Affairs and a national parliament.

The main use of the ComRAT malware is to steal confidential documents, in one such case researchers observed that “deployed a .NET executable to interact with the victim’s central MS SQL Server database containing the organization’s documents.”

In addition to document stealing the hacker group runs various commands to gather information about services such as “Active Directory groups or users, the network, or Microsoft Windows configurations such as the group policies.”

ComRAT Malware
ComRAT Malware Operation

The most recently compiled ComRAT malware dated November 2019, according to the ESET telemetry, the malware was installed using an existing foothold such as compromised credentials or via another Turla backdoor.

All the files associated with ComRAT are stored in a Virtual File System and the VFS is encrypted using AES-256 in XTS mode.

Two Command and Control channels

  • HTTP – The malware makes HTTP requests to its C&C server.
  • Email – Uses the Gmail web interface to receive commands and exfiltrate data
Gmail used for C&C

The most interesting feature with the new version of the malware uses the Gmail web UI to receive commands and exfiltrate data.

So that attackers can bypass some security solutions as the communication not from the malicious domains. Eset published a detailed report with Indicators of compromise.

You can follow us on Linkedin, Twitter, Facebook for daily Cybersecurity and hacking news updates.

Website

Latest articles

Wireshark 4.2.4 Released: What’s New!

Wireshark stands as the undisputed leader, offering unparalleled tools for troubleshooting, analysis, development, and...

Zoom Unveils AI-Powered All-In-One AI Work Workplace

Zoom has taken a monumental leap forward by introducing Zoom Workplace, an all-encompassing AI-powered...

iPhone Users Beware! Darcula Phishing Service Attacking Via iMessage

Phishing allows hackers to exploit human vulnerabilities and trick users into revealing sensitive information...

2 Chrome Zero-Days Exploited at Pwn2Own 2024: Patch Now

Google has announced a crucial update to its Chrome browser, addressing several vulnerabilities, including...

The Moon Malware Hacked 6,000 ASUS Routers in 72hours to Use for Proxy

Black Lotus Labs discovered a multi-year campaign by TheMoon malware targeting vulnerable routers and...

Hackers Actively Exploiting Ray AI Framework Flaw to Hack Thousands of Servers

A critical vulnerability in Ray, an open-source AI framework that is widely utilized across...

Chinese Hackers Attacking Southeast Asian Nations With Malware Packages

Cybersecurity researchers at Unit 42 have uncovered a sophisticated cyberespionage campaign orchestrated by two...
Guru baran
Guru baranhttps://gbhackers.com
Gurubaran is a co-founder of Cyber Security News and GBHackers On Security. He has 10+ years of experience as a Security Consultant, Editor, and Analyst in cybersecurity, technology, and communications.

Mitigating Vulnerability Types & 0-day Threats

Mitigating Vulnerability & 0-day Threats

Alert Fatigue that helps no one as security teams need to triage 100s of vulnerabilities.

  • The problem of vulnerability fatigue today
  • Difference between CVSS-specific vulnerability vs risk-based vulnerability
  • Evaluating vulnerabilities based on the business impact/risk
  • Automation to reduce alert fatigue and enhance security posture significantly

Related Articles