DOJ Asks Google to Sell $20 Billion Worth Chrome to End Monopoly

In a dramatic escalation of its antitrust lawsuit against Google, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has proposed sweeping changes to the tech giant’s operations, including the forced sale of its Chrome browser and potentially its Android operating system.

The proposal, which aims to address concerns over Google’s dominance in search distribution, has sparked sharp criticism from the company.

The DOJ’s remedies target Google’s search distribution agreements with major partners like Apple, Mozilla, smartphone manufacturers, and wireless carriers. However, Google has described the proposal as an “extreme” and “interventionist” move that goes far beyond the court’s initial findings in the case.

PLAINTIFFS’ INITIAL PROPOSED FINAL JUDGMENT Download

Leveraging 2024 MITRE ATT&CK Results for SME & MSP Cybersecurity Leaders – Attend Free Webinar

Key Points of DOJ’s Proposal

Forced Sale of Chrome and Android: The DOJ is advocating for the divestiture of Chrome and possibly Android, which Google argues would compromise the security, privacy, and quality of its products used by millions of Americans daily.
Disclosure Risks: The proposal would require Google to share sensitive innovations and even users’ personal search queries with domestic and foreign companies, raising privacy concerns.
Impact on AI Innovation: Google warns that the DOJ’s measures could stifle its investment in artificial intelligence, an area where it plays a leading global role.
Effect on Partners: The proposal could harm companies like Mozilla, whose Firefox browser relies on revenue from Google for search placement deals.
Government Oversight: A “Technical Committee” would be appointed to oversee Google’s operations, including mandating design approval for features like search choice screens on Pixel phones.

Google claims these measures amount to unprecedented government overreach that would harm consumers, developers, and small businesses while jeopardizing America’s technological leadership.

The company also argues that such interventions could disrupt access to its widely trusted search engine and other innovative services.

Google’s Response

In response, Google published a blog post saying, the DOJ’s approach as being far removed from the court’s original order and harmful to both users and the broader tech ecosystem. The company plans to file its own proposals next month as part of what is expected to be a lengthy legal process.

As the case unfolds, it highlights a critical debate over balancing competition in the tech industry with innovation and user experience a battle that could have far-reaching implications for both American consumers and global technology leadership.

Are you from SOC/DFIR Teams? – Analyse Malware & Phishing with ANY.RUN -> Try for Free

Balaji

BALAJI is an Ex-Security Researcher (Threat Research Labs) at Comodo Cybersecurity. Editor-in-Chief & Co-Founder - Cyber Security News & GBHackers On Security.