Sunday, March 23, 2025
HomeCVE/vulnerabilityPoC Exploit Released for F5 BIG-IP Command Injection Vulnerability

PoC Exploit Released for F5 BIG-IP Command Injection Vulnerability

Published on

SIEM as a Service

Follow Us on Google News

Security researchers have disclosed critical details about CVE-2025-20029, a command injection vulnerability in F5’s BIG-IP Traffic Management Shell (TMSH) command-line interface.

The flaw enables authenticated attackers with low privileges to bypass security restrictions, execute arbitrary commands, and gain root-level access to vulnerable systems.

A proof-of-concept (PoC) exploit demonstrating remote code execution was released on February 24, 2025, raising the urgency for organizations to patch affected devices.

CVE-2025-20029 Overview

The vulnerability resides in the TMSH parser’s handling of user-supplied inputs.

Attackers with valid credentials—even for accounts assigned non-administrative roles like auditor—can craft malicious commands that escape the CLI’s security sandbox.

This allows the injection of operating system commands directly into the underlying Linux environment.

Affected versions include F5 BIG-IP v16.1.4.1 and earlier. Successful exploitation grants full control over the device, enabling data theft, network traffic interception, or lateral movement into connected systems.

PoC Exploit Methodology

Github published PoC exploits that the save sys config TMSH command, which runs with root privileges by default.

Attackers inject a payload using shell metacharacters to split the original command into two parts:

  1. A legitimate save operation to the Common configuration partition.
  2. An arbitrary command executed via bash:
save sys config partitions { Common "\}; " bash -c id " ; \#" }

This payload leverages TMSH’s syntax parsing weaknesses.

The \}; sequence terminates the save command prematurely, while the subsequent bash -c id executes a system call to print the current user’s ID—confirming execution as root.

  • Requires access to the TMSH interface (via SSH or iControl REST API).
  • Injected commands must use binaries whitelisted by F5 (e.g., bash, tcpdump).
  • Target partition names (e.g., “Common”) must be valid to avoid command failure.

F5 released patches in Q1 2025. Administrators should:

  1. Immediately upgrade to BIG-IP v16.1.4.2 or later.
  2. Restrict TMSH access to essential users and audit role assignments.
  3. Monitor logs for unusual save commands or partition modifications.

Unpatched systems remain vulnerable to attackers leveraging compromised credentials.

F5 advises implementing network segmentation and multi-factor authentication for BIG-IP management interfaces.

The public release of this PoC underscores the risk of delayed patching for network infrastructure.

Organizations using F5 BIG-IP for load balancing, firewall, or application delivery services should treat CVE-2025-20029 as a critical priority.

Free Webinar: Better SOC with Interactive Malware Sandbox for Incident Response, and Threat Hunting - Register Here

Divya
Divya
Divya is a Senior Journalist at GBhackers covering Cyber Attacks, Threats, Breaches, Vulnerabilities and other happenings in the cyber world.

Latest articles

Attackers Leverage Weaponized CAPTCHAs to Execute PowerShell and Deploy Malware

In a recent surge of sophisticated cyberattacks, threat actors have been utilizing fake CAPTCHA...

Researchers Uncover FIN7’s Stealthy Python-Based Anubis Backdoor

Researchers have recently discovered a sophisticated Python-based backdoor, known as the Anubis Backdoor, deployed...

Researchers Reveal macOS Vulnerability Exposing System Passwords

A recent article by Noah Gregory has highlighted a significant vulnerability in macOS, identified...

JumpServer Flaws Allow Attackers to Bypass Authentication and Gain Full Control

JumpServer, a widely used open-source Privileged Access Management (PAM) tool developed by Fit2Cloud, has...

Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Free Webinar - Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Recent attacks like Polyfill[.]io show how compromised third-party components become backdoors for hackers. PCI DSS 4.0’s Requirement 6.4.3 mandates stricter browser script controls, while Requirement 12.8 focuses on securing third-party providers.

Join Vivekanand Gopalan (VP of Products – Indusface) and Phani Deepak Akella (VP of Marketing – Indusface) as they break down these compliance requirements and share strategies to protect your applications from supply chain attacks.

Discussion points

Meeting PCI DSS 4.0 mandates.
Blocking malicious components and unauthorized JavaScript execution.
PIdentifying attack surfaces from third-party dependencies.
Preventing man-in-the-browser attacks with proactive monitoring.

More like this

Attackers Leverage Weaponized CAPTCHAs to Execute PowerShell and Deploy Malware

In a recent surge of sophisticated cyberattacks, threat actors have been utilizing fake CAPTCHA...

Researchers Uncover FIN7’s Stealthy Python-Based Anubis Backdoor

Researchers have recently discovered a sophisticated Python-based backdoor, known as the Anubis Backdoor, deployed...

Researchers Reveal macOS Vulnerability Exposing System Passwords

A recent article by Noah Gregory has highlighted a significant vulnerability in macOS, identified...