Thursday, March 28, 2024

Facebook Sued two Chrome Developers for Scraping Profile Data

Facebook Inc. and Facebook Ireland have filed a legal action in Portugal against two people for scraping user-profiles and other data from Facebook’s website, in violation of its Terms of Service and Portugal’s Database Protection Law.

Malicious Chrome Extensions Target Facebook Users

The defendants developed browser extensions and made them available on the Chrome store using the business name “Oink and Stuff,” software company specialized in creating Android apps and browser extensions for Chrome, Firefox, Opera, and Microsoft Edge.

“They misled users into installing the extensions with a privacy policy that claimed they did not collect any personal information”, said Jessica Romero, Director of Platform Enforcement and Litigation at Facebook.

As the company develops a wide array of browser extensions, Facebook said in four extensions namely Web for Instagram plus DM, Blue Messenger, Emoji keyboard, and Green Messenger were malicious and contained hidden computer code that functioned like spyware.

Scraping is a form of data collection that relies on unauthorized automation to extract data from a website or app.

Facebook noted that, when people installed these extensions on their browsers, they were installing concealed code designed to scrape their information from the Facebook website, but also information from the users’ browsers unrelated to Facebook, all without their knowledge.

Upon visiting the Facebook website, the browser extensions were programmed to scrape the user’s name, user ID, gender, relationship status, age group and other information related to their account.

Final Word

Since early 2019, Facebook’s legal department has been filing lawsuits against several third-parties that have been abusing its platform.

In this case, Facebook at present asking a Portuguese judge to issue a permanent injunction against the Oink and Stuff team and force the company to delete all the Facebook user data they acquired through the four extensions.

The defendants did not compromise Facebook’s security systems. Instead, they used the extensions on the users’ devices to collect information, said Jessica Romero.

You can follow us on LinkedinTwitterFacebook for daily Cybersecurity, and hacking news updates.

Also Read

Facebook ads Abused to Steal 615000+ Logins in Phishing Campaign

Facebook Takedown Infrastructure of Hacker Groups Targeting Various Government Entities

Website

Latest articles

GoPlus’s Latest Report Highlights How Blockchain Communities Are Leveraging Critical API Security Data To Mitigate Web3 Threats

GoPlus Labs, the leading Web3 security infrastructure provider, has unveiled a groundbreaking report highlighting...

Wireshark 4.2.4 Released: What’s New!

Wireshark stands as the undisputed leader, offering unparalleled tools for troubleshooting, analysis, development, and...

Zoom Unveils AI-Powered All-In-One AI Work Workplace

Zoom has taken a monumental leap forward by introducing Zoom Workplace, an all-encompassing AI-powered...

iPhone Users Beware! Darcula Phishing Service Attacking Via iMessage

Phishing allows hackers to exploit human vulnerabilities and trick users into revealing sensitive information...

2 Chrome Zero-Days Exploited at Pwn2Own 2024: Patch Now

Google has announced a crucial update to its Chrome browser, addressing several vulnerabilities, including...

The Moon Malware Hacked 6,000 ASUS Routers in 72hours to Use for Proxy

Black Lotus Labs discovered a multi-year campaign by TheMoon malware targeting vulnerable routers and...
Guru baran
Guru baranhttps://gbhackers.com
Gurubaran is a co-founder of Cyber Security News and GBHackers On Security. He has 10+ years of experience as a Security Consultant, Editor, and Analyst in cybersecurity, technology, and communications.

Mitigating Vulnerability Types & 0-day Threats

Mitigating Vulnerability & 0-day Threats

Alert Fatigue that helps no one as security teams need to triage 100s of vulnerabilities.

  • The problem of vulnerability fatigue today
  • Difference between CVSS-specific vulnerability vs risk-based vulnerability
  • Evaluating vulnerabilities based on the business impact/risk
  • Automation to reduce alert fatigue and enhance security posture significantly

Related Articles