Tuesday, March 25, 2025
HomeCVE/vulnerabilityHackers Using 4 Zero-day Vulnerabilities to Attack Windows and Android Devices Remotely

Hackers Using 4 Zero-day Vulnerabilities to Attack Windows and Android Devices Remotely

Published on

SIEM as a Service

Follow Us on Google News

During a regular investigation, the security experts at Google have detected a major hacking campaign in early 2020. The experts have uncovered a series of complicated attacks by using the zero-day flaws upon Windows and Android platforms.

Google announced a six-part report recently and detailed the flaws, and they have also mentioned all the attacks that were being carried out through two exploited servers that deliver different exploit chains by watering hole attacks.

However, the threat actors have delivered the exploits with the help of watering-hole attacks, and these attacks trade-off sites frequented by the targets of interest and tie the sites with code that installs malware on visitors’ devices.

Extractions from the exploited servers 

After investigating the flaws, the Google experts have extracted some of the servers that are being exploited, and here we have mentioned them below:-

  • Four bugs in Chrome are being exploited by the renderer, one of which was still a 0-day at the point of discovery.
  • Two sandbox escape exploits violating three 0-day vulnerabilities in Windows.
  • A “privilege escalation kit” compounded of publicly that is known n-day exploits for older versions of Android.

Four zero-day exploits

There are four zero-day exploits that are detected by the experts, and here we have mentioned them below:-

  • CVE-2020-6418 – Chrome Vulnerability in TurboFan, and it was fixed in February 2020.
  • CVE-2020-0938 – Font Vulnerability on Windows, and it was fixed in April 2020.
  • CVE-2020-1020 – Font Vulnerability on Windows, and it was fixed in April 2020.
  • CVE-2020-1027 – Windows CSRSS Vulnerability, and it was fixed in April 2020.

Apart from this, Google has also affirmed a report along with its introductory blog post, and the report describes all the details of Chrome’s “infinity bug” that was used in the attacks, the Chrome exploit chains, and the Android exploit chains, post-exploitation steps on Android devices, and the Windows exploit chains.

However, all the provided details should allot other security merchants to identify the attacks on their customers and track down all the victims and other related attacks that were carried out by the same threat actor.

The experts asserted that whoever was behind the attacks has designed the exploit chains to be practiced modularly for performance and flexibility, and it has been showing clear evidence that they are specialists in what they do.

Not only this, but the experts have also presented complex code with a variety of novel exploitation techniques, mature logging, sophisticated and determined post-exploitation techniques, and high volumes of anti-analysis that are targeting the checks.

You can follow us on LinkedinTwitterFacebook for daily Cybersecurity, and hacking news updates.

Balaji
Balaji
BALAJI is an Ex-Security Researcher (Threat Research Labs) at Comodo Cybersecurity. Editor-in-Chief & Co-Founder - Cyber Security News & GBHackers On Security.

Latest articles

Linux Kernel 6.14 Released: Everything You Need to Know

Linus Torvalds released the Linux 6.14 kernel today after an unexpected quiet day yesterday,...

FBI Warns Against Using Unsafe File Converter Tools

The FBI Denver Field Office has sounded the alarm about a burgeoning scam involving...

Ingress NGINX RCE Vulnerability Allows Attackers to Compromise Entire Cluster

A series of remote code execution (RCE) vulnerabilities known as "IngressNightmare" have been discovered...

Hackers Deploy Fake Semrush Ads to Steal Google Account Credentials

In a recent cybersecurity threat, hackers have been using fake Semrush ads to target...

Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Free Webinar - Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Recent attacks like Polyfill[.]io show how compromised third-party components become backdoors for hackers. PCI DSS 4.0’s Requirement 6.4.3 mandates stricter browser script controls, while Requirement 12.8 focuses on securing third-party providers.

Join Vivekanand Gopalan (VP of Products – Indusface) and Phani Deepak Akella (VP of Marketing – Indusface) as they break down these compliance requirements and share strategies to protect your applications from supply chain attacks.

Discussion points

Meeting PCI DSS 4.0 mandates.
Blocking malicious components and unauthorized JavaScript execution.
PIdentifying attack surfaces from third-party dependencies.
Preventing man-in-the-browser attacks with proactive monitoring.

More like this

Ingress NGINX RCE Vulnerability Allows Attackers to Compromise Entire Cluster

A series of remote code execution (RCE) vulnerabilities known as "IngressNightmare" have been discovered...

WordPress Plugin Vulnerability Opens Door to SQL Injection Exploits

A critical vulnerability in the popular WordPress plugin GamiPress has been uncovered, leaving users...

WordPress Plugin Flaw Exposes 200,000+ Sites at Risk of Code Execution

A critical security vulnerability has been discovered in the popular WordPress plugin, WP Ghost,...