Thursday, March 28, 2024

Researchers Uncover How Lazarus Hacking Group Stole Millions of Dollars From ATMs

Lazarus Hacking Group is known for launching highly Sophisticated Cyber attacks targeting various sectors such as entertainment, financial services, defense, technology, and virtual currency industries, academia, and electric utilities.

Their activities including the development of various malware that was used for one of the biggest Wannacry Ransomware attacks in 2017, Sony cyber Attack on 2014 and Bangladesh Bank attack where attackers theft $81 million.

Security researchers from Symantec uncover the important tool used by Lazarus Hacking Group to steal money from the ATMs.

According to Symantec’s research, to make the fraudulent withdrawals, Lazarus first breaches targeted banks’ networks and compromises the switch application servers handling ATM transactions.

Once the server compromised they deploy previously unknown malware (Trojan.Fastcash) which intercepts the fraudulent withdrawal requests and send fake responses to dispense cash from ATMs.

Lazarus Hacking Group
Credits: Symantec

ISO 8583 is standard message format that details the exchange between the credit/debit card issuers and the devices where it used such as point-of-sale devices and automated teller machines.

Attackers inject malicious codes into a legitimate process on application servers running the AIX operating system, the inserted malicious script has the ability to construct the ISO 8583 messages.

According to Symantec analysis, the malware monitors incoming messages and intercepts the attacker generated fraudulent transaction requests to prevent them from reaching the switch application.

Then it transmits a fake response approving fraudulent withdrawal requests and the hacker group drops cash from the ATM.

“Symantec has found several different variants of (Trojan.Fastcash), each of which uses different response logic. The attackers appear to have built in a capability to selectively deny transactions based on their own blacklist of account numbers.”

Website

Latest articles

Hackers Actively Exploiting Ray AI Framework Flaw to Hack Thousands of Servers

A critical vulnerability in Ray, an open-source AI framework that is widely utilized across...

Chinese Hackers Attacking Southeast Asian Nations With Malware Packages

Cybersecurity researchers at Unit 42 have uncovered a sophisticated cyberespionage campaign orchestrated by two...

CISA Warns of Hackers Exploiting Microsoft SharePoint Server Vulnerability

Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has warned about a critical vulnerability in Microsoft...

Microsoft Expands Edge Bounty Program to Include WebView2!

Microsoft announced that Microsoft Edge WebView2 eligibility and specific out-of-scope information are now included...

Beware of Free Android VPN Apps that Turn Your Device into Proxies

Cybersecurity experts have uncovered a cluster of Android VPN applications that covertly transform user...

ZENHAMMER – First Rowhammer Attack Impacting Zen-based AMD Platforms

Despite AMD's growing market share with Zen CPUs, Rowhammer attacks were absent due to...

Airbus to Acquire INFODAS to Strengthen its Cybersecurity Portfolio

Airbus Defence and Space plans to acquire INFODAS, a leading cybersecurity and IT solutions...
Guru baran
Guru baranhttps://gbhackers.com
Gurubaran is a co-founder of Cyber Security News and GBHackers On Security. He has 10+ years of experience as a Security Consultant, Editor, and Analyst in cybersecurity, technology, and communications.

Mitigating Vulnerability Types & 0-day Threats

Mitigating Vulnerability & 0-day Threats

Alert Fatigue that helps no one as security teams need to triage 100s of vulnerabilities.

  • The problem of vulnerability fatigue today
  • Difference between CVSS-specific vulnerability vs risk-based vulnerability
  • Evaluating vulnerabilities based on the business impact/risk
  • Automation to reduce alert fatigue and enhance security posture significantly

Related Articles