Wednesday, March 26, 2025
HomeLinux malwareLinux Malware Agent Attack eCommerce Sites & Stealing Payment Data

Linux Malware Agent Attack eCommerce Sites & Stealing Payment Data

Published on

SIEM as a Service

Follow Us on Google News

Researchers have found a new, malicious Linux agent that hides as a system process on e-commerce servers. This new malicious Linux agent name is linux_avp, and it’s been discovered to be hiding in operating systems.

This malware uses a multi-stage attack that employs a backdoored library to obtain a malicious file from a remote location. The malware was created to inject JavaScript into pages and obtain customer information, such as:- 

  • Login IDs
  • Passwords

Malicious Golang-based malware agent

This kind of malicious agent had a very high success rate and enables the attacker to distinguish a specific vulnerability affecting these platforms. The attacker then took steps to exploit these vulnerabilities.

However, the most interesting part is that the threat actors have uploaded a Linux executable called linux_avp. Here, to remove itself from the disk and masquerade as a fake ps -ef process this Golang program starts.

The interpretation of linux_avp reveals that it has the potential to act as a backdoor, waiting for the commands from a Beijing (Alibaba) hosted server 47.113.202.35, and not only that even the function list of this malware also contains the spelling error “PostDecript.”

Malware spreading

The malware was uploaded to Virustotal, an online virus-scanning service, on October 8th by an individual who left the comment “test” in the file’s comments. 

However, it is not unusual for anti-virus vendors to miss a ransomware variant or two, but due to the level of sophistication in the encryption, the anti-virus vendors have not recognized this malware.

According to the report, “While it’s been assumed that the person who uploaded the malware to the customer’s store is surely the malware author, who thought that common anti-virus engines would not identify their creation.”

Here, the E-commerce sites seem to be particularly targeted during the holiday season, so it’s necessary on these sites to monitor and search out for potential attacks. 

Moreover, the retailers need to defend their customers by having a plan in place to recognize and mitigate these kinds of potential risks.

You can follow us on Linkedin, Twitter, Facebook for daily Cybersecurity, and hacking news updates.

Balaji
Balaji
BALAJI is an Ex-Security Researcher (Threat Research Labs) at Comodo Cybersecurity. Editor-in-Chief & Co-Founder - Cyber Security News & GBHackers On Security.

Latest articles

APT Hackers Exploit Google Chrome Zero-Day in Operation ForumTroll to Bypass Sandbox Protections

In mid-March 2025, Kaspersky researchers uncovered a sophisticated APT attack, dubbed Operation ForumTroll, which...

New Sophisticated Linux Backdoor Targets OT Systems via 0-Day RCE Exploit

Researchers at QiAnXin XLab have uncovered a sophisticated Linux-based backdoor dubbed OrpaCrab, specifically targeting...

New Chrome Installer Fails on Windows 10 & 11 With “This app can’t run on your PC” Error

A recent snag in Google's Chrome distribution process has left Windows users unable to...

North Korean Kimsuky Hackers Deploy New Tactics and Malicious Scripts in Recent Attacks

Security researchers have uncovered a new attack campaign by the North Korean state-sponsored APT...

Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Free Webinar - Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Recent attacks like Polyfill[.]io show how compromised third-party components become backdoors for hackers. PCI DSS 4.0’s Requirement 6.4.3 mandates stricter browser script controls, while Requirement 12.8 focuses on securing third-party providers.

Join Vivekanand Gopalan (VP of Products – Indusface) and Phani Deepak Akella (VP of Marketing – Indusface) as they break down these compliance requirements and share strategies to protect your applications from supply chain attacks.

Discussion points

Meeting PCI DSS 4.0 mandates.
Blocking malicious components and unauthorized JavaScript execution.
PIdentifying attack surfaces from third-party dependencies.
Preventing man-in-the-browser attacks with proactive monitoring.

More like this

Raspberry Robin Unveils 200 Unique Domains Used by Threat Actors

In a significant development, cybersecurity firm Silent Push has identified nearly 200 unique command...

Cybercriminals Bypass Security Using Legitimate Tools & Browser Extensions to Deliver Malware

In the second half of 2024, cybercriminals have increasingly leveraged legitimate Microsoft tools and...

Banking Malware Infects 248,000 Mobile Users Through Social Engineering Techniques

In 2024, the number of users affected by mobile banking malware skyrocketed to nearly...