Friday, March 29, 2024

Windows Users Beware! – More than 60% of Malicious Ads Targeting Windows Computer Systems

A new report shows that 61% of malicious ads on the Internet targeting Windows computers to infect with malware or to steal the information.

The malicious ads act as a platform to distribute malware, by attracting users and redirect them to malicious websites which results in downloading the malware.

Windows as Prime Target

According to Devcon observation between July 11 – November 22, 2019, 61% of the malicious ad campaigns primarily targeting the Windows operating system, when compared to other popular operating systems.

Next to the Windows operating system, the second most targeted operating system in ChromeOS which accounts for 22.5%, next is MacOS at 10.5% and the least targeted device is Apple iPads at 0.8%.

malicious ads
Malicious Ads Source: DEVCON

In another report published by Confiant, the malicious ads increased from Q2 to Q3. The Q3 attacks are targeting desktop computers, mainly running Windows and they are attacking users mainly in Italy, Spain, and Scandinavia.

The Windows operating is the most used one, it’s popularity let malware authors invest more time and resource to develop a more sophisticated malware. Wannacry is an example of it.

We can’t assume Linux OS is the most secured one, nowadays attackers targeting Linux servers also to install various malware, most particularly coin miner scripts.

With Q3 three different variations of ads observed

Malicious ad – Ads with Javascript that force redirection to another website.
In-Banner Video (IBV) ad – Serving Video ads with banner placements.
Low-Quality ad – Noisy ads based on user location

Researchers believe that “nearly 1 in every 250 impressions is dangerous or disruptive to the end-user, which equates to 4 billion malicious or disruptive impressions a month across the entire industry.”

You can follow us on Linkedin, Twitter, Facebook for daily Cybersecurity and hacking news updates.

Website

Latest articles

IT and security Leaders Feel Ill-Equipped to Handle Emerging Threats: New Survey

A comprehensive survey conducted by Keeper Security, in partnership with TrendCandy Research, has shed...

How to Analyse .NET Malware? – Reverse Engineering Snake Keylogger

Utilizing sandbox analysis for behavioral, network, and process examination provides a foundation for reverse...

GoPlus’s Latest Report Highlights How Blockchain Communities Are Leveraging Critical API Security Data To Mitigate Web3 Threats

GoPlus Labs, the leading Web3 security infrastructure provider, has unveiled a groundbreaking report highlighting...

Wireshark 4.2.4 Released: What’s New!

Wireshark stands as the undisputed leader, offering unparalleled tools for troubleshooting, analysis, development, and...

Zoom Unveils AI-Powered All-In-One AI Work Workplace

Zoom has taken a monumental leap forward by introducing Zoom Workplace, an all-encompassing AI-powered...

iPhone Users Beware! Darcula Phishing Service Attacking Via iMessage

Phishing allows hackers to exploit human vulnerabilities and trick users into revealing sensitive information...
Guru baran
Guru baranhttps://gbhackers.com
Gurubaran is a co-founder of Cyber Security News and GBHackers On Security. He has 10+ years of experience as a Security Consultant, Editor, and Analyst in cybersecurity, technology, and communications.

Mitigating Vulnerability Types & 0-day Threats

Mitigating Vulnerability & 0-day Threats

Alert Fatigue that helps no one as security teams need to triage 100s of vulnerabilities.

  • The problem of vulnerability fatigue today
  • Difference between CVSS-specific vulnerability vs risk-based vulnerability
  • Evaluating vulnerabilities based on the business impact/risk
  • Automation to reduce alert fatigue and enhance security posture significantly

Related Articles