Tuesday, July 16, 2024

Microsoft Changed the Method of Naming the Hacker Groups

Microsoft has initiated the naming taxonomy for threat actor groups. Over the years, threat actors have evolved massively, leading to confusion about which threat actor was responsible for which threat activity.

To solve this, Microsoft has introduced this naming taxonomy and categorized them based on their origin and activity.

Though threat intelligence has emerged massively, it must still be an organized data resource that can help protect and prioritize based on the hacking groups confronted.

Weather-based Hacking group name taxonomy

Microsoft has relied on weather condition names for naming these hacking groups as this can be easy to remember and spread the word.


Microsoft has categorized threat actors into five main groups based on their operations.

  1. Nation-state – These threat actors work on behalf of or are directly supported by a nation/state. They specifically target government agencies, intergovernmental organizations, espionage, financial gain, or as an act of retribution.
  2. Financially Motivated – These threat actors target an organization or an individual as a part of a financial motive. These threat actors/ groups did not seem to be linked with nation-state actors. The best examples of these threat actors are ransomware operators, phishing groups, or other groups with purely money-minded activities.
  3. Private Sector Offensive actors (PSOAs): These are threat actors who were once known as legal organizations but later seemed to have been involved in activities like creating malware, selling weapons and surveillance software to cyber criminals who use them for illegal purposes, or targeting any white-collar individuals. The best example of this kind of threat actor was the QuaDream company which was shut down recently for its malicious activities.
  4. Influence Operations: These are the threat actors that spread misinformation among people to disrupt or manipulate people’s interests. This kind of threat actor is also involved in political manipulations for malicious purposes.
  5. Groups in Development: This category set by Microsoft includes threat actors whose origin and way of operations are yet to be confirmed. In other words, these include threat actors still in developmental phases and involved in small-scale malicious attacks.

Microsoft has also released complete information on their new weather name taxonomy, including the family name, their origin or country of operation, and their category.

Building Your Malware Defense Strategy – Download Free E-Book


Latest articles

New Poco RAT Weaponizing 7zip Files Using Google Drive

The hackers weaponize 7zip files to pass through security measures and deliver malware effectively.These...

New ShadowRoot Ransomware Attacking Business Via Weaponized PDF’s

X-Labs identified basic ransomware targeting Turkish businesses, delivered via PDF attachments in suspicious emails...

Hacktivist Groups Preparing for DDoS Attacks Targeting Paris Olympics

Cyble Research & Intelligence Labs (CRIL) researchers have identified a cyber threat targeting the...

Critical Cellopoint Secure Email Gateway Flaw Let Attackers Execute Arbitrary Code

A critical vulnerability has been discovered in the Cellopoint Secure Email Gateway, identified as...

Singapore Banks to Phase out OTPs for Bank Account Logins Within 3 Months

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) and The Association of Banks in Singapore (ABS)...

GuardZoo Android Malware Attacking military personnel via WhatsApp To Steal Sensitive Data

A Houthi-aligned group has been deploying Android surveillanceware called GuardZoo since October 2019 to...

ViperSoftX Weaponizing AutoIt & CLR For Stealthy PowerShell Execution

ViperSoftX is an advanced malware that has become more complicated since its recognition in...
Guru baran
Guru baranhttps://gbhackers.com
Gurubaran is a co-founder of Cyber Security News and GBHackers On Security. He has 10+ years of experience as a Security Consultant, Editor, and Analyst in cybersecurity, technology, and communications.

Free Webinar

Low Rate DDoS Attack

9 of 10 sites on the AppTrana network have faced a DDoS attack in the last 30 days.
Some DDoS attacks could readily be blocked by rate-limiting, IP reputation checks and other basic mitigation methods.
More than 50% of the DDoS attacks are employing botnets to send slow DDoS attacks where millions of IPs are being employed to send one or two requests per minute..
Key takeaways include:

  • The mechanics of a low-DDoS attack
  • Fundamentals of behavioural AI and rate-limiting
  • Surgical mitigation actions to minimize false positives
  • Role of managed services in DDoS monitoring

Related Articles