Cyber Security News

Hackers Abuse MSP360 and ScreenConnect RMM Tools for Persistent Access and Credential Theft

The phishing campaigns that weaponize legitimate remote monitoring and management software to establish persistent access and support credential theft on Windows systems.

The campaign demonstrates a recurring operational trend: rather than exploit a vulnerability or deploy obvious custom malware, attackers are abusing trusted administrative platforms already designed to execute commands, transfer files, deploy applications, and maintain persistent access.

Microsoft said it found no evidence of a ScreenConnect software vulnerability being exploited; the tools themselves were legitimately obtained and misused after victims executed the phishing payload.

The intrusion begins with phishing emails and social-engineering landing pages impersonating common business workflows.

Observed lures included workplace meeting invitations, Zoom and Google Meet setup prompts, Adobe Acrobat and PDF-reader updates, RSVP e-cards, job-offer documents, signature requests, tax-themed files, and delivery notifications.

Victims were redirected to download locations hosted on actor-controlled infrastructure as well as legitimate cloud services, including Amazon S3, Cloudflare R2, Dropbox, GitLab, and Supabase.

This mixed hosting approach helps operators rotate payload locations rapidly and makes network-based blocking more difficult.

The downloaded executable was a legitimate, digitally signed MSP360 RMM version 2.5.0.67 installer, but renamed to resemble an expected document or application.

Sample filenames included VIP_ECARD_INVITATION_rmm_v2.5.0.67.exe, ZoomSetup_Installation_v2.5.0.67.exe, and PDF Reader & Editor the Adobe Acrobatte_rmm_v2.5.0.67.exe.

Microsoft published the following SHA-256 hash for the observed MSP360 installer:

108ef7e628d7a20bd6241a5b57149e27a6061f467123eb64061975559f8f73dc

After execution, the installer attempted to obtain elevated privileges through a User Account Control prompt.

Where users approved elevation, the installer deployed MSP360 components under C:\Program Files\RMM Agent\, registered the RMM.Agent.exe and RMM.Agent.Launcher.exe services, and added autorun entries for MSP360 user-interface components.

Attack chain showing phishing delivering a masqueraded MSP360 RMM installer that deploys ScreenConnect (Source : Microsoft).

The installation also created an inbound Windows Firewall rule allowing UDP traffic on port 48678 for RMM.Agent.exe.

These service, registry, and firewall changes gave the attacker durable remote-management access that could blend into expected IT-administration activity. Failed or denied UAC elevation prevented the installation from completing.

Microsoft observed that, the activity, observed in July 2026 across multiple industries, used a signed MSP360 Remote Monitoring and Management installer as the initial foothold before silently deploying ConnectWise ScreenConnect as a redundant remote-access channel.

MSP360 and RMM Abuse

The MSP360 service then launched PowerShell, modified the session execution policy, and used Invoke-WebRequest to retrieve a ClientSetup.msi package from attacker-controlled infrastructure.

The package was silently installed through msiexec.exe /qn, deploying ConnectWise ScreenConnect components, including ScreenConnect.ClientService.exe and ScreenConnect.WindowsClient.exe.

This created two independent remote-access paths. If defenders discovered or removed MSP360, the ScreenConnect client could still provide the operator with access to the compromised endpoint.

Actor-controlled tax-document lure prompting download of a masqueraded MSP360 installer (Source : Microsoft).

Following ScreenConnect deployment, attackers used the platform’s built-in RunFile capability to transfer and execute tools from ScreenConnect temporary directories, including paths under the user’s Documents and OneDrive folders.

Microsoft observed utilities masquerading as Windows security, Defender, Phone Link, password, and update-related applications.

Examples included WindowsSecurity_PIN.exe, WindowsSecurity_Password.exe, Passwords.EXE, WebBrowserPassView.exe, WebBrowserBookmarksView.exe, DefenderControl.exe, and HideMouse.exe.

The tooling supported information collection, browser credential access, payload execution, and attempts to reduce defender or user visibility.

Microsoft has not attributed the campaign to a named threat actor. It also observed separate July activity in which Faronics Deploy Agent was used as the first-stage RMM platform to install ScreenConnect, indicating that the technique is not exclusive to MSP360.

Organizations should inventory authorized RMM products and investigate any unapproved MSP360, ScreenConnect, or other remote-administration deployment.

Particular attention should be given to endpoints where both MSP360 and ScreenConnect were installed within a short period, PowerShell launched by RMM.Agent.exe, unexpected ClientSetup.msi installations, and firewall rules exposing UDP port 48678.

Microsoft recommends enforcing MFA for approved RMM platforms, using App Control for Windows or AppLocker publisher rules to block unauthorized signed management tools, and enabling cloud-delivered antivirus protection.

If an unauthorized RMM deployment is found, organizations should reset credentials used to install its services and investigate for system-level compromise and additional persistence.

IOCs

IndicatorTypeDescription
•108ef7e628d7a20bd6241a5b57149e27a6061f467123eb64061975559f8f73dcSHA256Legitimate MSP360 RMM v2.5.0.67 installer observed being distributed under deceptive filenames during the campaign. The observed sample was signed using a certificate that has since been revoked.
•f094b8263471c7b76dbed03d420736449920368fa0eca2ed6b1aea2645138d97
•857c2f283de799faa74b56e862c0a9f96e67aa1b4fa4a9e46395098365b99de3
•6a89de024ca62536de6f5fc10e49896bb1ac330ca39dce30203afdcc45ae237e
•4188c6588f3dcda881c3f2d12df580051179a999f040b799af506edeb3211a26
SHA256Legitimate MSP360 RMM Agent Service observed during the campaign

Note: IP addresses and domains are intentionally defanged (e.g., [.]) to prevent accidental resolution or hyperlinking. Re-fang only within controlled threat intelligence platforms such as MISP, VirusTotal, or your SIEM.

Cut every SOC alert investigation by 21 min. Power your SOC with instant IOC context for immediate response: Integrate TI Lookup in your SOC

Mayura Kathir

Mayura Kathir is a cybersecurity reporter at GBHackers News, covering daily incidents including data breaches, malware attacks, cybercrime, vulnerabilities, zero-day exploits, and more.

Recent Posts

Storm-2603 Hackers Exploit SharePoint and Abuse Cloudflare Tunnel to Hide Remote Access

A December intrusion to Storm-2603, the China-based group Microsoft ties to Warlock ransomware. The attackers…

2 minutes ago

OpenSSH sshole Flaw Allows Hackers to Log Into Password-Disabled Linux Accounts Using 257-Character Passwords

A decade-old authentication bypass in OpenSSH on musl-based Linux lets attackers log into accounts that…

5 minutes ago

New GhostMap Android Vulnerability Can Crash Phones Permanently Without Opening an App or Granting Permissions

Bitdefender researchers have revealed a vulnerability called GhostMap that affects Android devices. This vulnerability can…

14 minutes ago

Microsoft Paint Vulnerability Allows Hackers to Execute Malicious Code Remotely Without User Interaction

Microsoft has announced a vulnerability in Windows Paint that could let unauthenticated attackers execute malicious…

38 minutes ago

ARTEX AI Framework Linked to Bank Breaches and Cloud Attacks Found Exposed Across Hundreds of Servers

An autonomous penetration-testing framework linked to South Korean banking breaches and cloud supply-chain attacks is…

1 hour ago

Shopify Makes IP Allowlisting Mandatory for All Public Apps to Prevent Stolen API Token Abuse

Shopify is making IP allowlisting mandatory for all public apps to limit abuse of stolen…

1 hour ago