Thursday, March 28, 2024

OceanLotus APT Group Uses Undetected Ratsnif Remote Trojan to Leverage Network Attack’s

OceanLotus APT Group also known as APT32, SeaLotus, and CobaltKitty uses undetected Remote Access trojans Ratsnif to leverage network attack capabilities. The trojan was active since 2016, and it has features like packet sniffing, gateway/device ARP poisoning, DNS poisoning, HTTP injection, and MAC spoofing.

The Cylance Threat Research Team detected four distinct samples of Ratsnif trojan, out of four, three of them found developed in 2016 and one sample in 2018. There is no significant change with the version developed in 2016, and they are similar in functionality.

The fourth sample was developed in the second half of 2018; it has significant changes when compared to the previous version. Previous samples entirely depend on C2 servers, whereas the current sample doesn’t rely on C2 servers for operations.

It also includes some new features such as HTTP injection, protocol parsing, and SSL hijacking. It uses WolfSSL library for traffic decryption and http_parser.c for parsing HTTP traffic.The new sample also includes features like protocol parsing, ARP poisoning, DNS spoofing, HTTP redirection, and HTTP injection.

Ratsnif Multi-stage Infection

The initial payload is the loader DLL that copies 1st stage shellcode into memory and execute it. Which decompress the 2nd stage payload is the shellcode that executes into the memory and hooks several API functions that responsible for returning command line.

Researchers identified a bug in Ratsnif that could lead to memory read violation when parsing a specific parameter (“dwn_ip’). What happens is that the value is passed as a string and it should be passed as a pointer to a string.

The 2018 variant employs multiple sniffers for harvesting sensitive information from packets and to minimize the data extraction and to exfiltrate the process.

Ratsnif contains Base64 encoded C2 URL, but the trojan didn’t use it. Instead, it logs the captured information in a text, and uses another module to exfiltrate it, reads the analysis.

“Ratsnif is an intriguing discovery considering the length of time it has remained undetected, likely due to limited deployment. It offers a rare glimpse of over two years of feature development, allowing us to observe how threat actors tailor tooling to their nefarious purposes.”

In the previous campaign, OceanLotus uses steganography method to hide the encrypted malware payload within a .png image file to infect the targeted system.

You can follow us on Linkedin, Twitter, Facebook for daily Cybersecurity updates also you can take the Best Cybersecurity courses online to keep your self-updated.

Website

Latest articles

Hackers Actively Exploiting Ray AI Framework Flaw to Hack Thousands of Servers

A critical vulnerability in Ray, an open-source AI framework that is widely utilized across...

Chinese Hackers Attacking Southeast Asian Nations With Malware Packages

Cybersecurity researchers at Unit 42 have uncovered a sophisticated cyberespionage campaign orchestrated by two...

CISA Warns of Hackers Exploiting Microsoft SharePoint Server Vulnerability

Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has warned about a critical vulnerability in Microsoft...

Microsoft Expands Edge Bounty Program to Include WebView2!

Microsoft announced that Microsoft Edge WebView2 eligibility and specific out-of-scope information are now included...

Beware of Free Android VPN Apps that Turn Your Device into Proxies

Cybersecurity experts have uncovered a cluster of Android VPN applications that covertly transform user...

ZENHAMMER – First Rowhammer Attack Impacting Zen-based AMD Platforms

Despite AMD's growing market share with Zen CPUs, Rowhammer attacks were absent due to...

Airbus to Acquire INFODAS to Strengthen its Cybersecurity Portfolio

Airbus Defence and Space plans to acquire INFODAS, a leading cybersecurity and IT solutions...
Guru baran
Guru baranhttps://gbhackers.com
Gurubaran is a co-founder of Cyber Security News and GBHackers On Security. He has 10+ years of experience as a Security Consultant, Editor, and Analyst in cybersecurity, technology, and communications.

Mitigating Vulnerability Types & 0-day Threats

Mitigating Vulnerability & 0-day Threats

Alert Fatigue that helps no one as security teams need to triage 100s of vulnerabilities.

  • The problem of vulnerability fatigue today
  • Difference between CVSS-specific vulnerability vs risk-based vulnerability
  • Evaluating vulnerabilities based on the business impact/risk
  • Automation to reduce alert fatigue and enhance security posture significantly

Related Articles