OpenSSL Flaw Would Allow Attackers to Cause a denial-of-service Condition

OpenSSL has released a Security Advisory [on 8th of December 2020] regarding the vulnerability CVE-2020-1971 which is called EDIPARTYNAME NULL pointer de-reference.

What is the vulnerability?

X.509 digital certificate’s GeneralName type is a generic type for representing different types of names. One of those name types is known as EDIPartyName.

OpenSSL’s function GENERAL_NAME_cmp compares different instances of a GENERAL_NAME to see if they are equal or not.

It is found that this operation malfunctions when both GENERAL_NAMEs contain an EDIPARTYNAME. A NULL pointer de-reference and a crash may occur leading to a possible denial of service attack which is illustrated in gbhackers.

Risk assignment:

If an attacker controls the functions of the GENERAL_NAME_cmp, he can crash the entire system.

This GENERAL_NAME_cmp is used for the below two main purposes:

1) GENERAL_NAME_cmp compares the CRL distribution point names between an available CRL and a CRL (where CRL is the Certificate Revocation list)distribution point embedded in an X509 certificate

2) GENERAL_NAME_cmp verifies whether a timestamp response token signer matches the timestamp authority name (exposed via the API functions TS_RESP_verify_response and TS_RESP_verify_token)

Suppose if the attacker tricks a client machine or a server machine to check for a malicious certificate against a malicious CRL, then Attacker can exploit this and cause denial of service attack . It is also to be noted that some applications automatically download CRLs based on a URL embedded in a certificate. OpenSSL’s s_server, s_client and verify tools have support for the “-crl_download” option which implements automatic CRL downloading and this attack has been demonstrated to work against those tools.

Affected versions:

  • OpenSSL 1.1.1 and 1.0.2
  • This is not yet tested on the unsupported versions yet

Proposed advise:

  • OpenSSL 1.1.1 users are advised to upgrade to 1.1.1i with immediate effect.
  • Premium support customers of OpenSSL 1.0.2 have been asked to upgrade to 1.0.2x also other users are requested to upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1i right away.
Gurubaran

Gurubaran is a co-founder of Cyber Security News and GBHackers On Security. He has 10+ years of experience as a Security Consultant, Editor, and Analyst in cybersecurity, technology, and communications.

Recent Posts

Lumma Stealer Attacking Users To Steal Login Credentials From Browsers

Researchers observed Lumma Stealer activity across multiple online samples, including PowerShell scripts and a disguised…

2 days ago

New ‘OtterCookie’ Malware Attacking Software Developers Via Fake Job Offers

Palo Alto Networks reported the Contagious Interview campaign in November 2023, a financially motivated attack…

2 days ago

NjRat 2.3D Pro Edition Shared on GitHub: A Growing Cybersecurity Concern

The recent discovery of the NjRat 2.3D Professional Edition on GitHub has raised alarms in…

2 days ago

Palo Alto Networks Vulnerability Puts Firewalls at Risk of DoS Attacks

A critical vulnerability, CVE-2024-3393, has been identified in the DNS Security feature of Palo Alto…

2 days ago

Araneida Scanner – Hackers Using Cracked Version Of Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner

Threat Analysts have reported alarming findings about the "Araneida Scanner," a malicious tool allegedly based…

3 days ago

A Dark Web Operation Acquiring KYC Details TO Bypass Identity Verification Systems

A major dark web operation dedicated to circumventing KYC (Know Your Customer) procedures, which involves…

3 days ago