Saturday, April 13, 2024

New PDF Vulnerability Let Attackers Bypass the Signature Validation in PDF and Replace Content

A team of researchers from the Ruhr-University Bochum in Germany has reported the attacks bypassing the signature validation in PDF. Digitally signed PDFs are used in contracts and invoices to guarantee the authenticity and integrity of their content.

A user opening a signed PDF expects to see a warning in case of any modification. In 2019, Mladenov et al. revealed various parsing vulnerabilities in PDF viewer implementations. They showed attacks that could modify PDF documents without invalidating the signature. As a consequence, affected vendors of PDF viewers implemented countermeasures preventing all attacks.

Shadow Attacks

The shadow attacks avoid all existing countermeasures and break the integrity protection of digitally signed PDFs.

Experts say compared to previous attacks, the shadow attacks do not abuse implementation issues in a PDF viewer. In contrast, shadow attacks use the enormous flexibility provided by the PDF specification so that shadow documents remain standard compliant. Since shadow attacks abuse only legitimate features, they are hard to mitigate.

A shadow PDF document presents trustworthy content to the signers (top document). After signing this document, the attackers modify the document and enforce another view of the document on the victims’ side without invalidating the signature (bottom document).

Shadow Attacks: Hide, Replace, And Hide-And-Replace

  1. Shadow Attack: Hide

Aims to hide the content relevant to the victims behind a visible layer. For example, the attackers can hide the text “You are fired!” behind a full-page picture showing “Sign me to get the reward!”. Once the attackers receive the signed document, they manipulate the document so that the viewer application no longer renders the picture. Hide attacks have two advantages from the attackers perspective:

  • Many viewers show warnings if new visible content is added using Incremental Update. However, they do not warn in most cases if the content is removed.
  • The objects are still accessible within the PDF. In the example above, the text “You are fired!” can still be detected by a search function. This detection might be necessary if an online signing service is used, and it reviews the document by searching for specific keywords.
  • Shadow Attack: Replace

This type of shadow attack uses an Incremental Update that directly changes previously declared objects. Since the modification is not allowed for all types of objects, the attacker only changes objects that are considered harmless but can nevertheless change the document’s visible content.

For instance, the (re)definition of fonts does not change the content directly. However, it influences the view of the displayed content and makes number or character swapping possible.

  • Shadow Attack: Hide-and-Replace

The attackers create a shadow PDF document that is sent to the signers. The PDF document contains a hidden description of another document with different content. Since the signers cannot detect the hidden (malicious) content, they sign the document.

The picture above depicts that attackers successfully manipulate a signed document and force different views on the signers and the victims by using the Hide-and-Replace attack variant.

PDF-Attacker and Detector

PDF-Attacker, a toolset that automatically creates shadow attack exploits. PDF-Detector, a tool to prevent and detect shadow attacks.

The PDF-Attacker takes an arbitrary PDF as input, builds-in the shadow objects (Phase 1), signs the document (Phase 2), and finalizes the attack by enabling the shadow content (Phase 3). The PDF-Detector is a tool to detect malicious documents generated in Phase 1 and Phase 3.

As a result, PDF signatures are designed to protect the integrity and authenticity of PDFs. In contrast to the classical digital signature use cases that apply a signature only once on a target, PDF signatures address more complex use cases. A signed document is allowed to be updated without invalidating its signature, only in particular cases.

You can follow us on LinkedinTwitterFacebook for daily Cybersecurity, and hacking news updates.


Latest articles

Alert! Palo Alto RCE Zero-day Vulnerability Actively Exploited in the Wild

In a recent security bulletin, Palo Alto Networks disclosed a critical vulnerability in its...

6-year-old Lighttpd Flaw Impacts Intel And Lenovo Servers

The software supply chain is filled with various challenges, such as untracked security vulnerabilities...

Hackers Employ Deepfake Technology To Impersonate as LastPass CEO

A LastPass employee recently became the target of an attempted fraud involving sophisticated audio...

Sisence Data Breach, CISA Urges To Reset Login Credentials

In response to a recent data breach at Sisense, a provider of data analytics...

DuckDuckGo Launches Privacy Pro: 3-in-1 service With VPN

DuckDuckGo has launched Privacy Pro, a new subscription service that promises to enhance user...

Cyber Attack Surge by 28%:Education Sector at High Risk

In Q1 2024, Check Point Research (CPR) witnessed a notable increase in the average...

Midnight Blizzard’s Microsoft Corporate Email Hack Threatens Federal Agencies: CISA Warns

The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has issued an emergency directive concerning a...
Guru baran
Guru baran
Gurubaran is a co-founder of Cyber Security News and GBHackers On Security. He has 10+ years of experience as a Security Consultant, Editor, and Analyst in cybersecurity, technology, and communications.

Top 3 SME Attack Vectors

Securing the Top 3 SME Attack Vectors

Cybercriminals are laying siege to small-to-medium enterprises (SMEs) across sectors. 73% of SMEs know they were breached in 2023. The real rate could be closer to 100%.

  • Stolen credentials
  • Phishing
  • Exploitation of vulnerabilities

Related Articles