Sunday, February 9, 2025
HomeCVE/vulnerabilityPoC Exploit Released for TP-Link Code Execution Vulnerability (CVE-2024-54887)

PoC Exploit Released for TP-Link Code Execution Vulnerability (CVE-2024-54887)

Published on

SIEM as a Service

Follow Us on Google News

A serious code execution vulnerability in the TP-Link TL-WR940N router, identified as CVE-2024-54887, has become the focus of intense scrutiny following the release of a proof-of-concept (PoC) exploit.

This vulnerability allows attackers to execute arbitrary code on the device remotely without authentication, posing significant risks to network security.

The following article provides an overview of the vulnerability, the exploit development process, and the implications for users and manufacturers.

Understanding CVE-2024-54887

CVE-2024-54887 specifically targets TP-Link TL-WR940N routers running hardware versions 3 and 4. The vulnerability arises from improper validation of HTTP parameters, particularly in the DNS server settings for IPv6.

Investigate Real-World Malicious Links & Phishing Attacks With Threat Intelligence Lookup - Try for Free

The vulnerable parameters dnsserver1 and dnsserver2 can be exploited through stack buffer overflow, which can overwrite critical memory regions, leading to control over the device’s execution flow.

Configuring DDNS sends a request to the NoipDddnsRpm.htm endpoint with 4 parameters
Configuring DDNS sends a request to the NoipDddnsRpm.htm endpoint with 4 parameters

The discovery of this vulnerability originated from an interest in reverse engineering and exploit development. Using tools like Firmadyne, researchers have been able to emulate the router’s firmware, allowing for dynamic and static analysis.

According to the InfoSec in Medium, Static analysis revealed that the router firmware lacked significant protections, such as NX (Non-Executable) and PIE (Position Independent Executable), indicating potential avenues for exploitation.

The researcher identified that while most parameters in the router’s HTTP requests incorporated basic string length checks, the DNS server parameters did not. By sending oversized requests, an attacker could manipulate the execution flow, leading to a stack overflow.

Exploit Development

The exploit was developed by constructing a crafted HTTP request aimed at overflowing the buffer used for the DNS server settings. Here’s the key component of the Python script, which encapsulates the exploit:

#!/usr/bin/python3

import urllib.parse

import requests

import struct

def exploit(session_url, auth):

    print("[+] Sending exploit to: " + session_url + "Wan6to4TunnelCfgRpm.htm")

    libc_base = 0x2aae2000  # Base address for libc

    shellcode = b"\x24\x0f\xff\xfa\x01\xe0\x78..."  # Truncated for brevity

    # Craft payload

    payload = 'A' * 596  # Buffer overflow

    # NOP sled for shellcode

    payload += b'\x27\x70\xc0\x01'  # NOP instruction

    # Adding gadgets and shellcode

    payload += struct.pack(">I", libc_base + 0x3680c)  # Gadget for execution control

    payload += b"B" * 40  # Padding to shellcode

    payload += shellcode  # Actual shellcode

    # Complete URL with exploit

    exploit_url = session_url + "Wan6to4TunnelCfgRpm.htm?dnsserver1=" + payload

    requests.get(exploit_url, headers={"Cookie": auth})

# Additional functions for authentication, etc. go here...

In this code:

  • The exploit function crafts an HTTP request that includes a carefully structured payload designed to exploit the buffer overflow.
  • The payload begins with a series of ‘A’ characters to fill the buffer, includes a NOP sled, and finally the shellcode that will gain remote access to the router.

Utilizing Return-Oriented Programming (ROP)

Given the lack of ASLR (Address Space Layout Randomization) on the device, the exploit leverages ROP to maintain control flow post-exploitation.

The attacker constructs a chain of gadgets—small sequences of instructions that perform various tasks, ultimately leading to the execution of the shellcode.

The critical gadgets are organized to facilitate calling the shellcode after a sleep function, allowing time for the exploit to succeed.

The implications of CVE-2024-54887 are severe. If successfully exploited, attackers could gain complete control over the affected devices, leading to potential data breaches and unauthorized access to connected networks. Users are urged to:

  • Update Firmware: Check for the latest firmware updates from TP-Link and apply them promptly.
  • Strengthen Security: Use strong passwords and disable features like remote management that may expose the device.
  • Monitor Network Activity: Regularly review network traffic for unusual activity.

The release of the PoC exploit for CVE-2024-54887 is a sobering reminder of the vulnerabilities that can exist in widely used consumer devices.

 As the threat landscape evolves, users and manufacturers must remain vigilant. Security must be a collaborative effort to protect against potential exploits and ensure the safety of personal and organizational networks.

Integrating Application Security into Your CI/CD Workflows Using Jenkins & Jira -> Free Webinar

Divya
Divya
Divya is a Senior Journalist at GBhackers covering Cyber Attacks, Threats, Breaches, Vulnerabilities and other happenings in the cyber world.

Latest articles

UK Pressures Apple to Create Global Backdoor To Spy on Encrypted iCloud Access

United Kingdom has reportedly ordered Apple to create a backdoor allowing access to all...

Autonomous LLMs Reshaping Pen Testing: Real-World AD Breaches and the Future of Cybersecurity

Large Language Models (LLMs) are transforming penetration testing (pen testing), leveraging their advanced reasoning...

Securing GAI-Driven Semantic Communications: A Novel Defense Against Backdoor Attacks

Semantic communication systems, powered by Generative AI (GAI), are transforming the way information is...

Cybercriminals Target IIS Servers to Spread BadIIS Malware

A recent wave of cyberattacks has revealed the exploitation of Microsoft Internet Information Services...

Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Free Webinar - Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Recent attacks like Polyfill[.]io show how compromised third-party components become backdoors for hackers. PCI DSS 4.0’s Requirement 6.4.3 mandates stricter browser script controls, while Requirement 12.8 focuses on securing third-party providers.

Join Vivekanand Gopalan (VP of Products – Indusface) and Phani Deepak Akella (VP of Marketing – Indusface) as they break down these compliance requirements and share strategies to protect your applications from supply chain attacks.

Discussion points

Meeting PCI DSS 4.0 mandates.
Blocking malicious components and unauthorized JavaScript execution.
PIdentifying attack surfaces from third-party dependencies.
Preventing man-in-the-browser attacks with proactive monitoring.

More like this

UK Pressures Apple to Create Global Backdoor To Spy on Encrypted iCloud Access

United Kingdom has reportedly ordered Apple to create a backdoor allowing access to all...

Autonomous LLMs Reshaping Pen Testing: Real-World AD Breaches and the Future of Cybersecurity

Large Language Models (LLMs) are transforming penetration testing (pen testing), leveraging their advanced reasoning...

Securing GAI-Driven Semantic Communications: A Novel Defense Against Backdoor Attacks

Semantic communication systems, powered by Generative AI (GAI), are transforming the way information is...