Thursday, March 28, 2024

Purple Fox Malware Propagates as Worms Attacking Windows Machines

Recently, cybersecurity researchers have asserted that they have detected a botnet that is continuously targeting Windows devices that are rapidly growing in size.

According to the experts, this new malware was dubbed as Purple Fox, and this new malware is active since 2018.

In total, the researchers have spotted more than 90,000 incidents through the year 2020 and the beginning of 2021. However, this new discovery of a worm-like infection vector states that the consumer-grade malware continues to produce profits for cybercriminals.

Exposed Windows devices are at risk

The port scanning and exploitation attempts of this malware were initially started at end of the year, and the scanning was based on the telemetry that was being obtained utilizing the GGSN (Guardicore Global Sensors Network).

Purple Fox’s freshly added up some worm module that generally uses SMB password brute force so that it can easily infect it. Even Purple Fox has also deployed its malware droppers, and along with it also added further additional modules on a comprehensive network of bots.

There is a unit of almost 2,000 hazarded servers, and it’s not only confirmed by the experts, but it is also being confirmed by the Guardicore Global Sensors Network as well.

MSI package contains

After investigating the whole malware, the security researchers came to know that this worm-like infection vector has an MSI package and it contains three files, here we have mentioned them below:-

  • A 64bit DLL payload (winupdate64)
  • A 32bit DLL payload (winupdate32)
  • An encrypted file containing a rootkit

Gaining persistence using open-source rootkit

The cybersecurity analysts have assured that the Purple Fox generally installs a rootkit module which later uses all the hidden open-source rootkit after a proper investigation.

The main motive of this rootkit is to hide all the dropped files and folders, not only this but it also hides in Windows registry entries that are generally produced on the affected systems. 

Purple Fox infections have soared nearly 600% since May 2020, and this data is being collected from Guardicore’s own network of internet sensors.

However, the cybersecurity company obtained that the campaign smearing through two mechanisms, one is a worm payload after which a victim machine gets compromised by a vulnerable exposed service.

And the other one is the worm that’s the payload is being transmitted by an email within a phishing campaign. Not only this but Guardicore also issued indicators of trade-off so that it will help the networks to easily identify if they have been infected or not.

You can follow us on Linkedin, Twitter, Facebook for daily Cybersecurity, and hacking news updates.

Website

Latest articles

GoPlus’s Latest Report Highlights How Blockchain Communities Are Leveraging Critical API Security Data To Mitigate Web3 Threats

GoPlus Labs, the leading Web3 security infrastructure provider, has unveiled a groundbreaking report highlighting...

Wireshark 4.2.4 Released: What’s New!

Wireshark stands as the undisputed leader, offering unparalleled tools for troubleshooting, analysis, development, and...

Zoom Unveils AI-Powered All-In-One AI Work Workplace

Zoom has taken a monumental leap forward by introducing Zoom Workplace, an all-encompassing AI-powered...

iPhone Users Beware! Darcula Phishing Service Attacking Via iMessage

Phishing allows hackers to exploit human vulnerabilities and trick users into revealing sensitive information...

2 Chrome Zero-Days Exploited at Pwn2Own 2024: Patch Now

Google has announced a crucial update to its Chrome browser, addressing several vulnerabilities, including...

The Moon Malware Hacked 6,000 ASUS Routers in 72hours to Use for Proxy

Black Lotus Labs discovered a multi-year campaign by TheMoon malware targeting vulnerable routers and...
Balaji
Balaji
BALAJI is an Ex-Security Researcher (Threat Research Labs) at Comodo Cybersecurity. Editor-in-Chief & Co-Founder - Cyber Security News & GBHackers On Security.

Mitigating Vulnerability Types & 0-day Threats

Mitigating Vulnerability & 0-day Threats

Alert Fatigue that helps no one as security teams need to triage 100s of vulnerabilities.

  • The problem of vulnerability fatigue today
  • Difference between CVSS-specific vulnerability vs risk-based vulnerability
  • Evaluating vulnerabilities based on the business impact/risk
  • Automation to reduce alert fatigue and enhance security posture significantly

Related Articles