Tuesday, March 18, 2025
HomeAIResearchers Jailbreak 17 Popular LLM Models to Reveal Sensitive Data

Researchers Jailbreak 17 Popular LLM Models to Reveal Sensitive Data

Published on

SIEM as a Service

Follow Us on Google News

In a recent study published by Palo Alto Networks’ Threat Research Center, researchers successfully jailbroke 17 popular generative AI (GenAI) web products, exposing vulnerabilities in their safety measures.

The investigation aimed to assess the effectiveness of jailbreaking techniques in bypassing the guardrails of large language models (LLMs), which are designed to prevent the generation of harmful or sensitive content.

Vulnerabilities Exposed

The researchers employed both single-turn and multi-turn strategies to manipulate the LLMs into producing restricted content or leaking sensitive information.

Single-turn strategies, such as “storytelling” and “instruction override,” were found to be effective in certain scenarios, particularly for data leakage goals.

However, multi-turn strategies, including “crescendo” and “Bad Likert Judge,” proved more successful in achieving AI safety violations.

LLM Models
Malicious repeated token attack and the response.

These multi-turn approaches often involve gradual escalation of prompts to bypass safety measures, leading to higher success rates in generating harmful content like malware or hateful speech.

The study revealed that all tested GenAI applications were susceptible to jailbreaking in some capacity, with the most vulnerable to multiple strategies.

While single-turn attacks showed moderate success for safety violations, multi-turn strategies significantly outperformed them, achieving success rates up to 54.6% for certain goals.

This disparity highlights the need for robust security measures to counter advanced jailbreaking techniques.

LLM Models
 Overall jailbreak results with single-turn and multi-turn strategies.

Implications

The findings underscore the importance of implementing comprehensive security solutions to monitor and mitigate the risks associated with LLM use.

Organizations can leverage tools like the Palo Alto Networks portfolio to enhance cybersecurity while promoting AI adoption.

The study emphasizes that while most AI models are safe when used responsibly, the potential for misuse necessitates vigilant oversight and the development of more robust safety protocols.

The researchers note that their study focuses on edge cases and does not reflect typical LLM use scenarios.

However, the results provide valuable insights into the vulnerabilities of GenAI applications and the need for ongoing research to improve their security.

As AI technology continues to evolve, addressing these vulnerabilities will be crucial to ensuring the safe and ethical deployment of LLMs in various applications.

Collect Threat Intelligence on the Latest Malware and Phishing Attacks with ANY.RUN TI Lookup -> Try for free

Aman Mishra
Aman Mishra
Aman Mishra is a Security and privacy Reporter covering various data breach, cyber crime, malware, & vulnerability.

Latest articles

Fake Coinbase Migration Messages Target Users to Steal Wallet Credentials

A sophisticated phishing campaign is currently targeting cryptocurrency investors with fraudulent emails claiming to...

Electromagnetic Side-Channel Analysis of Cryptographically Secured Devices

Electromagnetic (EM) side-channel analysis has emerged as a significant threat to cryptographically secured devices,...

MirrorGuard: Adaptive Defense Mechanism Against Jailbreak Attacks for Secure Deployments

A novel defense strategy, MirrorGuard, has been proposed to enhance the security of large...

New ClearFake Variant Uses Fake reCAPTCHA to Deploy Malicious PowerShell Code

A recent variant of the ClearFake malware framework has been identified, leveraging fake reCAPTCHA...

Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Free Webinar - Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Recent attacks like Polyfill[.]io show how compromised third-party components become backdoors for hackers. PCI DSS 4.0’s Requirement 6.4.3 mandates stricter browser script controls, while Requirement 12.8 focuses on securing third-party providers.

Join Vivekanand Gopalan (VP of Products – Indusface) and Phani Deepak Akella (VP of Marketing – Indusface) as they break down these compliance requirements and share strategies to protect your applications from supply chain attacks.

Discussion points

Meeting PCI DSS 4.0 mandates.
Blocking malicious components and unauthorized JavaScript execution.
PIdentifying attack surfaces from third-party dependencies.
Preventing man-in-the-browser attacks with proactive monitoring.

More like this

Fake Coinbase Migration Messages Target Users to Steal Wallet Credentials

A sophisticated phishing campaign is currently targeting cryptocurrency investors with fraudulent emails claiming to...

Electromagnetic Side-Channel Analysis of Cryptographically Secured Devices

Electromagnetic (EM) side-channel analysis has emerged as a significant threat to cryptographically secured devices,...

MirrorGuard: Adaptive Defense Mechanism Against Jailbreak Attacks for Secure Deployments

A novel defense strategy, MirrorGuard, has been proposed to enhance the security of large...