Friday, March 29, 2024

Russian Hacker Who Operated Kelihos Botnet Pleads Guilty in US Federal Court

A Russian man who operates Kelihos Botnet Pleads in U.S. Federal Court to Fraud, Conspiracy, Computer Crime and Identity Theft Offenses.

Peter Levashov operated the botnet for decades to facilitate the malicious activities such as credentials harvesting, bulk spam e-mails, Delivering ransomware and other malware’s.

U.S. Attorney Durham said, “Mr. Levashov used the Kelihos botnet to distribute thousands of spam e-mails, harvest login credentials, and install malicious software on computers around the world.” He also participated in online forums to sell the stolen identities such as credit card information and another cybercrime tool.

Kelihos Botnet

The Kelihos botnet first appeared in December 2010, it is also known as a peer-to-peer botnet, it empowers every individual node to go about as a Command and Control server.

The first version of the botnet performed denial-of-service attacks and email spam, with the later version threat actors, added ability to steal Bitcoin wallets to mine cryptocurrencies.

Peter Levashov was arrested on April 7, 2017, in Barcelona by Spanish authorities based on the complaint and arrest warrant issued by the U.S District Court. At the time of arrest, Kelihos had at least 50,000 computers in botnet chain.

“Levashov lived quite comfortably while his criminal behavior disrupted the lives of thousands of computer users and today justice has finally arrived for Peter Levashov,” said FBI Special Agent in Charge Turner.

Levashov pleaded guilty before U.S. District Judge Robert N. Chatigny for damage to a protected computer, one count of conspiracy, one count of wire fraud and one count of aggravated identity theft. He is due to be sentenced on 6-Sept-2019 reads DoJ press release.

Related Read

Raise of IoT Botnets Responsible for Massive DDoS Attacks – Q2 2018 Threat Report

Android Based Malicious CryptoMiner Spreading by Worm that has Infected more than 5,000 devices in 24 hours

Ursnif Malware Variant Performs Malicious Process Injection in Memory using TLS Anti-Analysis Evasion Trick

Website

Latest articles

Beware Of Weaponized Air Force invitation PDF Targeting Indian Defense And Energy Sectors

EclecticIQ cybersecurity researchers have uncovered a cyberespionage operation dubbed "Operation FlightNight" targeting Indian government...

WarzoneRAT Returns Post FBI Seizure: Utilizing LNK & HTA File

The notorious WarzoneRAT malware has made a comeback, despite the FBI's recent efforts to...

Google Revealed Kernel Address Sanitizer To Harden Android Firmware And Beyond

Android devices are popular among hackers due to the platform’s extensive acceptance and open-source...

Compromised SaaS Supply Chain Apps: 97% of Organizations at Risk of Cyber Attacks

Businesses increasingly rely on Software as a Service (SaaS) applications to drive efficiency, innovation,...

IT and security Leaders Feel Ill-Equipped to Handle Emerging Threats: New Survey

A comprehensive survey conducted by Keeper Security, in partnership with TrendCandy Research, has shed...

How to Analyse .NET Malware? – Reverse Engineering Snake Keylogger

Utilizing sandbox analysis for behavioral, network, and process examination provides a foundation for reverse...

GoPlus’s Latest Report Highlights How Blockchain Communities Are Leveraging Critical API Security Data To Mitigate Web3 Threats

GoPlus Labs, the leading Web3 security infrastructure provider, has unveiled a groundbreaking report highlighting...
Guru baran
Guru baranhttps://gbhackers.com
Gurubaran is a co-founder of Cyber Security News and GBHackers On Security. He has 10+ years of experience as a Security Consultant, Editor, and Analyst in cybersecurity, technology, and communications.

Mitigating Vulnerability Types & 0-day Threats

Mitigating Vulnerability & 0-day Threats

Alert Fatigue that helps no one as security teams need to triage 100s of vulnerabilities.

  • The problem of vulnerability fatigue today
  • Difference between CVSS-specific vulnerability vs risk-based vulnerability
  • Evaluating vulnerabilities based on the business impact/risk
  • Automation to reduce alert fatigue and enhance security posture significantly

Related Articles