Monday, February 10, 2025
HomeMalwareSideWalk Backdoor Added New Tool in Arsenal to Target Linux Servers

SideWalk Backdoor Added New Tool in Arsenal to Target Linux Servers

Published on

SIEM as a Service

Follow Us on Google News

A Linux variant of the SideWalk backdoor has been developed by Chinese hackers who the Chinese government supports. Microsoft Windows OS-based systems belonging to academic institutions are targeted with this backdoor.

A high level of confidence is assigned to the threat group SparklingGoblin, also known as Earth Baku, as the source of the malware. 

Moreover, the APT41, a cyberespionage group suspected of being linked to this campaign, is also thought to be involved.

Academic Sectors Were Targeted

As of the moment, security researchers at the cybersecurity company ESET have identified the SideWalk Linux backdoor as StageClient, which has been observed in the past.

There has been a report that the 360 Netlab researchers have spotted an early variant of the malware. The Specter botnet that attacks IP cameras was reported and described two years ago by security analysts.

While it has been determined that both Specter and StageClient have been identified as Linux variants of SideWalk, and also share the same roots as well.

In the past, a number of targets have been attacked with SideWalk Linux.  But, in February 2021, SideWalk Linux was deployed against only one victim, and that’s a Hong Kong-based university.

During the students’ protests in May 2020, SparkGoblin had also focused its efforts on the same university, which had been compromised by the group in the past.

Considering that SparklingGoblin mainly attacks its targets in East Asia and Southeast Asia, it is a bit shocking that it has occurred here.

Threads used

There are two variants and both of them applied the ChaCha20 encrypting algorithm to counter the value of 0x0B, and it’s the initial value. While SideWalk has a particular way of doing this, and it’s something that is unique to them.

There are five identical threads used by the malware, similar to the malware running on Windows and Linux. Each thread is executed simultaneously, to carry out specific tasks, and here below we have mentioned all the threads used:-

  • [StageClient::ThreadNetworkReverse]
  • [StageClient::ThreadHeartDetect]
  • [StageClient::ThreadPollingDriven]
  • [StageClient::ThreadBizMsgSend]
  • [StageClient::ThreadBizMsgHandler]

A Google Docs file was accessed by both Windows and Linux variants of SideWalk as well as the dead-drop resolver strings that were used to deliver the payload.

Download Free SWG – Secure Web Filtering – E-book

Balaji
Balaji
BALAJI is an Ex-Security Researcher (Threat Research Labs) at Comodo Cybersecurity. Editor-in-Chief & Co-Founder - Cyber Security News & GBHackers On Security.

Latest articles

SHA256 Hash Calculation from Data Chunks

The SHA256 algorithm, a cryptographic hash function, is widely used for securing data integrity...

New Report of of 1M+ Malware Samples Show Application Layer Abused for Stealthy C2

A recent analysis of over one million malware samples by Picus Security has revealed...

Seven-Year-Old Linux Kernel Bug Opens Door to Remote Code Execution

Researchers have uncovered a critical vulnerability in the Linux kernel, dating back seven years,...

Ransomware Payments Plunge 35% as More Victims Refuse to Pay

In a significant shift within the ransomware landscape, global ransom payments plummeted by 35%...

Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Free Webinar - Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Recent attacks like Polyfill[.]io show how compromised third-party components become backdoors for hackers. PCI DSS 4.0’s Requirement 6.4.3 mandates stricter browser script controls, while Requirement 12.8 focuses on securing third-party providers.

Join Vivekanand Gopalan (VP of Products – Indusface) and Phani Deepak Akella (VP of Marketing – Indusface) as they break down these compliance requirements and share strategies to protect your applications from supply chain attacks.

Discussion points

Meeting PCI DSS 4.0 mandates.
Blocking malicious components and unauthorized JavaScript execution.
PIdentifying attack surfaces from third-party dependencies.
Preventing man-in-the-browser attacks with proactive monitoring.

More like this

New Report of of 1M+ Malware Samples Show Application Layer Abused for Stealthy C2

A recent analysis of over one million malware samples by Picus Security has revealed...

NanoCore RAT Attack Windows Using Task Scheduler to Captures keystrokes, screenshots

NanoCore, a notorious Remote Access Trojan (RAT), continues to pose a significant threat to...

Cybercriminals Target IIS Servers to Spread BadIIS Malware

A recent wave of cyberattacks has revealed the exploitation of Microsoft Internet Information Services...