Friday, March 29, 2024

Vulnerable Exchange Server Hit by Squirrelwaffle Malware Loader

Squirrelwaffle malware has been found in existence since the mid of September 2021. This malware is designed to cause chain infections. The Rapid Response Team at Sophos has recently discovered that the Squirrelwaffle malware loader used ProxyLogon and ProxyShell exploits for targeting Microsoft Exchange Server.

After gaining access to the vulnerable server, the attackers used the email thread hijacking technique which involves inserting malicious replies into Employees’ existing email threads to distribute the Squirrelwaffle malware to both internal and external recipients.

When they monitored further, they found that the vulnerable server was not only used for malicious spam campaigns but also for a financial fraud attack by extracting information from a stolen email thread.

Squirrelwaffle

Squirrelwaffle is a type of malware loader distributed via spam campaigns as a malicious office document. This provides information about the victim’s environment and with a channel that can be used to deliver and infect with other malware. 

When a victim opens the malicious office document and enables macros, it downloads a VB script and executes Cobalt Strike Beacons which give control over the victim’s machine.

The Investigation

Usually, the Squirrelwaffle attack is ended when the defenders detect and remediate by providing patches to the vulnerable servers. But in the recent set of events, such remediation measures wouldn’t have stopped the financial fraud attack as they have already exported an email thread about customer payment from the victim’s exchange server. Hence it is recommended to investigate further for other impacts.

Typo-squatted domains were registered and used by the attackers for email thread replies.

The registered domain appears similar to the original victim’s domain but with a small typo that is often not noticed by the victims. Once they convince the victims, they use these email threads to redirect the payments.
Image

To provide additional legitimacy to the victims, they used additional email addresses from the typo-squatted domain and added them in CC of the reply emails. Just like every other phishing campaign, these attackers also provide a sense of urgency to the victims.

Prevention

It is advised to keep the Microsoft Exchange Servers updated and patched to prevent any type of compromise. Industry-recognized prevention methods such as SPF records, DKIM, and DMARC records must be standard to stop phishing campaigns. It is also necessary to provide knowledge to all the employees about Phishing attempts.

You can follow us on Linkedin, Twitter, Facebook for daily Cybersecurity updates.

Website

Latest articles

Beware Of Weaponized Air Force invitation PDF Targeting Indian Defense And Energy Sectors

EclecticIQ cybersecurity researchers have uncovered a cyberespionage operation dubbed "Operation FlightNight" targeting Indian government...

WarzoneRAT Returns Post FBI Seizure: Utilizing LNK & HTA File

The notorious WarzoneRAT malware has made a comeback, despite the FBI's recent efforts to...

Google Revealed Kernel Address Sanitizer To Harden Android Firmware And Beyond

Android devices are popular among hackers due to the platform’s extensive acceptance and open-source...

Compromised SaaS Supply Chain Apps: 97% of Organizations at Risk of Cyber Attacks

Businesses increasingly rely on Software as a Service (SaaS) applications to drive efficiency, innovation,...

IT and security Leaders Feel Ill-Equipped to Handle Emerging Threats: New Survey

A comprehensive survey conducted by Keeper Security, in partnership with TrendCandy Research, has shed...

How to Analyse .NET Malware? – Reverse Engineering Snake Keylogger

Utilizing sandbox analysis for behavioral, network, and process examination provides a foundation for reverse...

GoPlus’s Latest Report Highlights How Blockchain Communities Are Leveraging Critical API Security Data To Mitigate Web3 Threats

GoPlus Labs, the leading Web3 security infrastructure provider, has unveiled a groundbreaking report highlighting...
Guru baran
Guru baranhttps://gbhackers.com
Gurubaran is a co-founder of Cyber Security News and GBHackers On Security. He has 10+ years of experience as a Security Consultant, Editor, and Analyst in cybersecurity, technology, and communications.

Mitigating Vulnerability Types & 0-day Threats

Mitigating Vulnerability & 0-day Threats

Alert Fatigue that helps no one as security teams need to triage 100s of vulnerabilities.

  • The problem of vulnerability fatigue today
  • Difference between CVSS-specific vulnerability vs risk-based vulnerability
  • Evaluating vulnerabilities based on the business impact/risk
  • Automation to reduce alert fatigue and enhance security posture significantly

Related Articles