Thursday, May 22, 2025
HomeTechTCP vs UDP – Understanding the Difference

TCP vs UDP – Understanding the Difference

Published on

SIEM as a Service

Follow Us on Google News

If you have ever had to configure a firewall, set up a router, or choose the best VPN for your computer, chances are you heard of the TCP and UDP protocols. However, if you’re reading this article, you’re probably confused about what they are, their purpose, and their main characteristics.

Today, we’ll look at the differences between TCP and UDP and the reasons why there are two transport layer protocols.

What is Transport Protocol?

Before we can dive deeper into the differences between TCP and UDP, you should know what a transport protocol is in the first place.

- Advertisement - Google News

Both the User Datagram Protocol (UDP) and the Transport Control Protocol (TCP) are mechanisms used by applications and software to transfer packets of data on the Internet.

In a nutshell, whenever you send data on the internet (such as sending a file over Skype or Facebook, or just a mail), the transfer protocol is like a postman that sends that information to the destination by splitting it into several small packages (packets).

They are both built on the IP protocol, meaning that each packet sent by either protocol is forwarded to an IP address through a series of intermediary routers.

In fact, neither one of them interacts directly with the IP layer. You probably heard of them as TCP/IP and UDP/IP – it’s the same thing. People call them TCP and UDP for the sake of simplicity.

However, they are, by far, the most used; the TCP and UDP are not the only two protocols working on top of IP. For example, many different VPN protocols are used to hide and encrypt data.

What is the TCP?

TCP is a connection-oriented protocol that sends packets back and forth from the sender to the destination and vice-versa. It ensures that every packet is delivered to the server in the exact order it was sent initially by establishing a two-sided connection between the sender and receiver.

It also uses a flow control mechanism that stores data in buffers. This way, the application will send data only when it’s ready to be received, preventing the sender from being overwhelmed and avoiding bottlenecks. However, all this overhead work means that TCP is usually slower.

When is it More Convenient To Use TCP?

TCP is a reliable transmission protocol that ensures that data is sent in a specific order and error-checked at all times. Since packets are tracked and checked for corruption, no data is ever lost even if network issues occur in between.

TCP is the best choice if you are hosting a website or need to ensure that data is sent correctly and without risk of corruption. However, you need both sides to be online or communication cannot be set up.

Pros of TCP

  • Very reliable
  • Data lost will be resent
  • Delivery is guaranteed
  • Packets are checked for errors and corruption

Cons of TCP

  • Requires both sides to be online during the transfer
  • Slower than UDP
  • It doesn’t work offline

What is UDP?

As specified in the RFC768 document, UDP is the most straightforward protocol, quickest, and most efficient. Packets are lightweight since they’re sent with minimal headers, and no connection is established before datagrams are sent (connectionless). UDP is used to send emails – you send them even if the receiver it’s offline.

To keep things more straightforward (and faster), no recovery is set – all corrupted or missing packets are discarded and not requested again. The sender will keep sending the packets, regardless of whether the recipient receives them.

Packets are sent in a continuous stream with no flow control, meaning that data is transferred much quicker than TCP, but if a network issue occurs, all packets are dropped.

When is it More Convenient to Use UDP?

To keep things simple, UDP is better than TCP whenever you need speed over reliability. For example, it is the ideal choice in online gaming, where you only care about what’s happening in real-time.

If you lost a packet while shooting someone, there’s no point in receiving it later. Other examples are applications that require speed and efficiency such as broadcasting platforms or streaming networks. UDP is usually preferred in log management activities to avoid TCP-related timeouts or connection issues.

Pros of UDP

  • Extremely quick and efficient
  • Reduced network traffic
  • It doesn’t require both parties to be connected

Cons of UDP

  • Delivery is never guaranteed
  • Packets may get lost or corrupted
  • Data cannot be sequenced

Conclusion

Both the TCP and UDP protocols have their benefits and drawbacks. Depending on your needs, you may prefer one or the other. Even today, many technologies, such as emails or online gaming, require the use of either a connectionless rather than a connection-oriented protocol, regardless of overhead, reliability, or speed.

Written By: Cyber Writes

Latest articles

Hackers Target Mobile Users Using PWA JavaScript to Bypass Browser Security

A sophisticated new injection campaign has been uncovered, targeting mobile users through malicious third-party...

Docker Zombie Malware Infects Containers for Crypto Mining and Self-Replication

A novel malware campaign targeting containerized infrastructures has emerged, exploiting insecurely exposed Docker APIs...

Hackers Masquerade as Organizations to Steal Payroll Logins and Redirect Payments from Employees

ReliaQuest, hackers have deployed a cunning search engine optimization (SEO) poisoning scheme to orchestrate...

PupkinStealer Exploits Web Browser Passwords and App Tokens to Exfiltrate Data Through Telegram

A newly identified .NET-based information-stealing malware, dubbed PupkinStealer (also known as PumpkinStealer in some...

Resilience at Scale

Why Application Security is Non-Negotiable

The resilience of your digital infrastructure directly impacts your ability to scale. And yet, application security remains a critical weak link for most organizations.

Application Security is no longer just a defensive play—it’s the cornerstone of cyber resilience and sustainable growth. In this webinar, Karthik Krishnamoorthy (CTO of Indusface) and Phani Deepak Akella (VP of Marketing – Indusface), will share how AI-powered application security can help organizations build resilience by

Discussion points


Protecting at internet scale using AI and behavioral-based DDoS & bot mitigation.
Autonomously discovering external assets and remediating vulnerabilities within 72 hours, enabling secure, confident scaling.
Ensuring 100% application availability through platforms architected for failure resilience.
Eliminating silos with real-time correlation between attack surface and active threats for rapid, accurate mitigation

More like this

The Impact of Generative AI on Modern Cybersecurity Risks

In the rapidly evolving landscape of digital technology, generative AI stands as both a...

Intruder vs. Acunetix vs. Attaxion: Comparing Vulnerability Management Solutions

The vulnerability management market is projected to reach US$24.08 billion by 2030, with numerous...

Chrome 137 Integrates Gemini Nano AI to Combat Tech Support Scams

Google has unveiled a groundbreaking defense mechanism in Chrome 137, integrating its on-device Gemini...