Thursday, March 28, 2024

A Zero-day Vulnerability in TP-link Router Let Hackers Gain Admin Privilege & Take Full Control of It Remotely

Researchers discovered a new firmware vulnerability in TP-link Archer C5 (v4) routers Let the attacker gain an Admin Password, and allow them remote takeover the router.

Once the vulnerability has successfully exploited, a remote attacker takes over the router configurated through Telnet on the local area network (LAN) and connects to a File Transfer Protocol (FTP) server via both LAN and WAN.

The vulnerability marked as “Critical” severity since it grants access to unauthorized third-party access due to the improper authentication, and it affects the TP-link Archer C5 router that deployed in both home and business environments.

It is very dangerous for business networks where router with this kind of critical vulnerability will allow an attacker to enable the Guest WiFi, through which an attacker enters into the internal network.

How Does the Router Vulnerability Can be Triggered by Attackers

An attacker could trigger the vulnerability by just sending the vulnerable HTTP request to be granted access to the device.

Basically, there are two types of requests that are considering here, one if “Safe” and another one if “Malicious”. In Safe requests, two parameters must be validated: TokenID and the JSESSIONID.

“But the Common Gateway Interface (CGI) validation here is only based on the referrer’s HTTP headers that used to matches the IP address or the domain associated with tplinkwifi.net, and then the routers Main domain (HTTPD), will recognize it as valid .”

In this case, The vulnerability affected both HTTP POST and GET requests and voiding the admin password when string length exceeds the allowed number of bytes.

TP-link
Vulnerable HTTP POST request does not verify required parameters

According to IBM report , “The short way of describing this flaw is vulnerable HTTP requests that void the user’s password. In an overflow issue of sorts, when a string that’s shorter than the expected string length is sent through as the user’s password, the password value gets distorted into some non-ASCII bytes.”

The vulnerability has been reported to the TP-link and the patch has been issued on version TP-Link Archer C5 v4 and other versions that may be exposed.

You can also read the complete firmware analysis to know more about this vulnerability and how it was discovered.

Website

Latest articles

Wireshark 4.2.4 Released: What’s New!

Wireshark stands as the undisputed leader, offering unparalleled tools for troubleshooting, analysis, development, and...

Zoom Unveils AI-Powered All-In-One AI Work Workplace

Zoom has taken a monumental leap forward by introducing Zoom Workplace, an all-encompassing AI-powered...

iPhone Users Beware! Darcula Phishing Service Attacking Via iMessage

Phishing allows hackers to exploit human vulnerabilities and trick users into revealing sensitive information...

2 Chrome Zero-Days Exploited at Pwn2Own 2024: Patch Now

Google has announced a crucial update to its Chrome browser, addressing several vulnerabilities, including...

The Moon Malware Hacked 6,000 ASUS Routers in 72hours to Use for Proxy

Black Lotus Labs discovered a multi-year campaign by TheMoon malware targeting vulnerable routers and...

Hackers Actively Exploiting Ray AI Framework Flaw to Hack Thousands of Servers

A critical vulnerability in Ray, an open-source AI framework that is widely utilized across...

Chinese Hackers Attacking Southeast Asian Nations With Malware Packages

Cybersecurity researchers at Unit 42 have uncovered a sophisticated cyberespionage campaign orchestrated by two...
Balaji
Balaji
BALAJI is an Ex-Security Researcher (Threat Research Labs) at Comodo Cybersecurity. Editor-in-Chief & Co-Founder - Cyber Security News & GBHackers On Security.

Mitigating Vulnerability Types & 0-day Threats

Mitigating Vulnerability & 0-day Threats

Alert Fatigue that helps no one as security teams need to triage 100s of vulnerabilities.

  • The problem of vulnerability fatigue today
  • Difference between CVSS-specific vulnerability vs risk-based vulnerability
  • Evaluating vulnerabilities based on the business impact/risk
  • Automation to reduce alert fatigue and enhance security posture significantly

Related Articles