Tuesday, February 11, 2025
HomeCyber AttackTurla Hackers Leveraging Microsoft Build Engine To Deliver Malware Stealthily

Turla Hackers Leveraging Microsoft Build Engine To Deliver Malware Stealthily

Published on

SIEM as a Service

Follow Us on Google News

Hackers exploit the Microsoft Build Engine because it can execute code and build applications. 

This engine provides an easy means for them to send harmful payloads using legitimate software development tools. 

Moreover, inside corporate environments, Build Engine’s trusted nature enables it to bypass particular security controls, making it a perfect target for cyber attacks.

Cybersecurity researchers at Cyble recently identified that Turla hackers have been actively leveraging the Microsoft build engine to deliver malware stealthily.

Turla Hackers Leveraging Microsoft Build Engine

A campaign utilized malicious .LNK files masquerading as PDF documents. The .LNK file displayed lure documents related to human rights and public advisories to trick targets.

Free Webinar on Live API Attack Simulation: Book Your Seat | Start protecting your APIs from hackers

Opening it installed a backdoor with remote control capabilities controlled by a Command and Control server.

Similar file shared in Twitter (Source – Cyble)

The attack begins with a malicious .LNK file in a ZIP, likely distributed via phishing. Executing the .LNK runs a PowerShell script that drops a lure PDF, encrypted data, and an MSBuild project to %temp%. 

It opens the lure PDF while silently executing the MSBuild project. 

Lure pdf (Source – Cyble)

This decrypts the data to a .log file, which is another MSBuild project scheduled to run via Task Scheduler for backdoor activities. MSBuild allows executing code in memory for fileless attacks.

The malicious .LNK file drops an MSBuild project that decrypts embedded data into another MSBuild project “nJUFcFfUF.log”. 

This is scheduled to run every 20 minutes, executing an inline task that creates two threads – one hides the MSBuild process, the other fetches commands from a compromised C&C server using a unique machine ID. 

Received commands enable backdoor functionality like executing shell commands, uploading/downloading files, changing directories, and running PowerShell scripts on the victim machine, Cyble said.

The backdoor employs multiple threads to perform malicious operations under attacker control stealthily. This campaign is attributed to the Russian-based Turla APT group with medium confidence. 

Indicators include Russian language comments, targeting of NGOs (potentially Ukraine-related), and use of basic backdoor functionality leveraging compromised websites for C&C infrastructure – both approaches associated with Turla. 

Specifics like the PHP-based C&C directories, machine identifier parameters in HTTP requests, and threaded command execution resemble previous Turla and TinyTurla backdoor tactics. 

The lure document’s human rights NGO theme aligns with Turla’s targeting interests.

Recommendations

Here below we have mentioned all the recommendations:-

  • Deploy strong email filtering to block malicious attachments.
  • Exercise caution with emails and attachments from unknown senders.
  • Restrict access to MSBuild for authorized personnel only.
  • Disable or limit the PowerShell execution if not required.
  • Implement network monitoring to detect and block suspicious activities.

IOCs

IOCs (Source – Cyble)

ANYRUN malware sandbox’s 8th Birthday Special Offer: Grab 6 Months of Free Service

Tushar Subhra
Tushar Subhra
Tushar is a Cyber security content editor with a passion for creating captivating and informative content. With years of experience under his belt in Cyber Security, he is covering Cyber Security News, technology and other news.

Latest articles

12,000+ KerioControl Firewalls Exposed to 1-Click RCE Attack

Cybersecurity researchers caution that over 12,000 instances of GFI KerioControl firewalls remain unpatched and...

Apple iOS 0-day Vulnerability Exploited Wild in Extremely Sophisticated Attack

Apple has released emergency security updates to address a zero-day vulnerability, CVE-2025-24200, that has...

SHA256 Hash Calculation from Data Chunks

The SHA256 algorithm, a cryptographic hash function, is widely used for securing data integrity...

New Report of of 1M+ Malware Samples Show Application Layer Abused for Stealthy C2

A recent analysis of over one million malware samples by Picus Security has revealed...

Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Free Webinar - Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Recent attacks like Polyfill[.]io show how compromised third-party components become backdoors for hackers. PCI DSS 4.0’s Requirement 6.4.3 mandates stricter browser script controls, while Requirement 12.8 focuses on securing third-party providers.

Join Vivekanand Gopalan (VP of Products – Indusface) and Phani Deepak Akella (VP of Marketing – Indusface) as they break down these compliance requirements and share strategies to protect your applications from supply chain attacks.

Discussion points

Meeting PCI DSS 4.0 mandates.
Blocking malicious components and unauthorized JavaScript execution.
PIdentifying attack surfaces from third-party dependencies.
Preventing man-in-the-browser attacks with proactive monitoring.

More like this

12,000+ KerioControl Firewalls Exposed to 1-Click RCE Attack

Cybersecurity researchers caution that over 12,000 instances of GFI KerioControl firewalls remain unpatched and...

Apple iOS 0-day Vulnerability Exploited Wild in Extremely Sophisticated Attack

Apple has released emergency security updates to address a zero-day vulnerability, CVE-2025-24200, that has...

SHA256 Hash Calculation from Data Chunks

The SHA256 algorithm, a cryptographic hash function, is widely used for securing data integrity...