Thursday, March 28, 2024

U.S. Sues Google for Dominance Over Digital Advertising Technologies

Recently, the US Justice Department along with the eight states filed a lawsuit against Google, accusing the company of having a monopoly on the online advertising market, which they argue harms advertisers, consumers, and even the US government. 

They claim that Google has breached Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act. While the goal of the suit is to break up Google’s control of the online advertising ecosystem. 

Here below we have mentioned other eight states that participated with the US Justice Department:-

  • California
  • Colorado
  • Connecticut
  • New Jersey
  • New York
  • Rhode Island
  • Tennessee
  • Virginia

It is alleged that Google is taking significant steps silently to eliminate competition in the online advertising space through several key acquisitions. In short, making it is challenging for advertisers to use other alternatives to its products.

The US economy relies heavily on free and fair markets, and monopolies threaten the foundations of these markets. This is a situation that limits innovation, hurts workers and producers, and increases consumer costs.

Google’s Dominance Over Digital Advertising

For over a decade, Google has allegedly engaged in actions that inhibit the growth of competing technologies and influenced the workings of online advertising auctions, thereby coercing advertisers and publishers to utilize its platforms.

This lawsuit alleges that the company has unfairly monopolized the way ads are served online by excluding competitors as part of its unfair business practices.

It has now become common practice for Google to control the digital tool that nearly all major website publishers use to sell advertisements on their sites or to monetize their sites.

Google’s revenue comes primarily from its digital ads, and in terms of revenue, Google is currently generating just over 80% of its revenue from digital ads.

Google’s Anticompetitive Conduct

The following are some of the anti-competitive practices that Google has been engaging in:-

  • Acquiring Competitors
  • Forcing Adoption of Google’s Tools
  • Distorting Auction Competition
  • Auction Manipulation

Publishers, advertisers, and competitors have been hindered in their adoption of alternative technologies as a result of Google’s anticompetitive practices.

The Sherman Act, a cornerstone of American antitrust legislation, has been staunchly upheld for over a century as a means to maintain a fair and open marketplace. 

This Act serves as a reminder of the dedication to economic freedom and fair competition, as the Department of Justice continues to enforce it against monopolistic practices to promote healthy competition.

The Department has filed a civil antitrust complaint asserting an antitrust violation under the Sherman Act for the first time in approximately half a century in a monopolization case.

The Department of Justice is taking action to address Google’s alleged monopolistic behavior. This includes not only seeking restitution for the American public but also seeking triple damages for any financial losses suffered by government agencies as a result of overpaying for web display advertising.

Network Security Checklist – Download Free E-Book

Website

Latest articles

GoPlus’s Latest Report Highlights How Blockchain Communities Are Leveraging Critical API Security Data To Mitigate Web3 Threats

GoPlus Labs, the leading Web3 security infrastructure provider, has unveiled a groundbreaking report highlighting...

Wireshark 4.2.4 Released: What’s New!

Wireshark stands as the undisputed leader, offering unparalleled tools for troubleshooting, analysis, development, and...

Zoom Unveils AI-Powered All-In-One AI Work Workplace

Zoom has taken a monumental leap forward by introducing Zoom Workplace, an all-encompassing AI-powered...

iPhone Users Beware! Darcula Phishing Service Attacking Via iMessage

Phishing allows hackers to exploit human vulnerabilities and trick users into revealing sensitive information...

2 Chrome Zero-Days Exploited at Pwn2Own 2024: Patch Now

Google has announced a crucial update to its Chrome browser, addressing several vulnerabilities, including...

The Moon Malware Hacked 6,000 ASUS Routers in 72hours to Use for Proxy

Black Lotus Labs discovered a multi-year campaign by TheMoon malware targeting vulnerable routers and...
Guru baran
Guru baranhttps://gbhackers.com
Gurubaran is a co-founder of Cyber Security News and GBHackers On Security. He has 10+ years of experience as a Security Consultant, Editor, and Analyst in cybersecurity, technology, and communications.

Mitigating Vulnerability Types & 0-day Threats

Mitigating Vulnerability & 0-day Threats

Alert Fatigue that helps no one as security teams need to triage 100s of vulnerabilities.

  • The problem of vulnerability fatigue today
  • Difference between CVSS-specific vulnerability vs risk-based vulnerability
  • Evaluating vulnerabilities based on the business impact/risk
  • Automation to reduce alert fatigue and enhance security posture significantly

Related Articles