Tuesday, March 25, 2025
HomeMalwareVigilante Malware That Blocks Infected Computers From Downloading Pirated Software

Vigilante Malware That Blocks Infected Computers From Downloading Pirated Software

Published on

SIEM as a Service

Follow Us on Google News

By distributing Vigilante malware a developer has managed to stop the spread of pirated software. Though, it may sound a bit odd, but, in the future, this malware blocks the infected computers from downloading and accessing any pirated software sites.

According to the experts’ investigation, this malware doesn’t steal any password, it simply blocks the users that are infected by this malware. However, the main motive of doing this is to get access to a large number of websites that are dedicated to software piracy.

Usually, the pirated software and fake crack websites are used by hackers to spread malware to trick their victims and make them believe that they are downloading the latest game or any movie.

Malware blocks access to software piracy sites

The security researchers of SophosLabs, Andrew Brandt have initially noticed that the vigilante malware is being administered is eventually stopping the pirates from accessing famous torrent sites like “The Pirate Bay,” and many more.

Apart from all this the Brandt in one of its reports stated that this new type of malware is being administered via Discord or pirated software.

While in the case of Discord the malware is being distributed as standalone executables that are disguising themselves as pirated software.

To add many entries that lead to 127.0.0.1 for the sites linked with “The Pirate Bay,” the malware modifies the Windows HOSTS file, and here all this happens, once the victim administers the executable of malware.

Not a Regular Malware

The main motive of every malware is to get cryptocurrency by stealing data in different ways, but it’s not the same in this case. However, the security researchers have pronounced that the samples of this malware do not justify the typical motive for this malware.

In the form of an HTTP GET request the file name and IP address are sent to the 1flchier[.]com that is controlled by the threat actors. Here, just with a simple change of “L” instead of “I” the threat actors can easily confuse the victim.

Apart from this, Brandt affirmed that malware in the files is considerably the same, unlike the names that are generated by the malware in the web requests.

Detection and cleanup

The cybersecurity researchers of SophosLabs have detected this malware with the help of its very unique runtime packer. And according to the specialists, the users who accidentally run these kinds of files can simply clean up their HOSTS file.

Since the Vigilante has no proper uniform method, it indicates that it will not remain installed on the infected system. So, the experts opined that the users who get infected with this malware need to edit their hosts file only to get disinfected.

You can follow us on Linkedin, Twitter, Facebook for daily Cybersecurity, and hacking news updates.

Balaji
Balaji
BALAJI is an Ex-Security Researcher (Threat Research Labs) at Comodo Cybersecurity. Editor-in-Chief & Co-Founder - Cyber Security News & GBHackers On Security.

Latest articles

Ingress NGINX RCE Vulnerability Allows Attackers to Compromise Entire Cluster

A series of remote code execution (RCE) vulnerabilities known as "IngressNightmare" have been discovered...

Hackers Deploy Fake Semrush Ads to Steal Google Account Credentials

In a recent cybersecurity threat, hackers have been using fake Semrush ads to target...

Pocket Card Users Targeted in Sophisticated Phishing Campaign

A new phishing campaign targeting Japanese Pocket Card users has been uncovered by Symantec....

Albabat Ransomware Expands Reach to Target Linux and macOS Platforms

A recent report from Trend Micro has revealed that a new variant of the...

Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Free Webinar - Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Recent attacks like Polyfill[.]io show how compromised third-party components become backdoors for hackers. PCI DSS 4.0’s Requirement 6.4.3 mandates stricter browser script controls, while Requirement 12.8 focuses on securing third-party providers.

Join Vivekanand Gopalan (VP of Products – Indusface) and Phani Deepak Akella (VP of Marketing – Indusface) as they break down these compliance requirements and share strategies to protect your applications from supply chain attacks.

Discussion points

Meeting PCI DSS 4.0 mandates.
Blocking malicious components and unauthorized JavaScript execution.
PIdentifying attack surfaces from third-party dependencies.
Preventing man-in-the-browser attacks with proactive monitoring.

More like this

New Rust-Based Linux Kernel Module Unveiled to Detect Rootkits

A recent development in Linux kernel security has led to the creation of a...

SvcStealer Malware Strikes, Harvesting Sensitive Data from Browsers and Applications

A new strain of malware, known as SvcStealer, has emerged as a significant threat...

Attackers Leverage Weaponized CAPTCHAs to Execute PowerShell and Deploy Malware

In a recent surge of sophisticated cyberattacks, threat actors have been utilizing fake CAPTCHA...