Thursday, February 6, 2025
HomeComputer SecurityOperation WildPressure - APT Hackers Launching new C++ RAT called Milum To...

Operation WildPressure – APT Hackers Launching new C++ RAT called Milum To Gain Remote Access

Published on

SIEM as a Service

Follow Us on Google News

WildPressure, a new APT(Advanced persistent threat) group targets organizations in the Middle East to distribute Milum RAT and to take control of the infected device.

The Milum RAT was first spotted in a campaign by Kaspersky researchers in August 2019, the RAT was written in C++. The new campaign doesn’t share any similarities with the old one.

WildPressure Targets the Middle East

The hacker group targets industrial sectors in the Middle East starting from May 2019, the Milum RAT spreading mechanism was still unknown.

The application get’s installed in the machine as an invisible toolbar window, the primary function is to create a separate thread for communication.

WildPressure
WildPressure APT

Researchers also spotted that malware doing lots of “Zlib compression functions, such as zlibVersion(), inflate() or deflate(). This compression is needed for C2 communication, but in reality, there is no need to export them in the case of a standalone application.”

By decoding its configuration data Milum gets the following parameters such as “clientid” and “encrypt_key” to use in RC4 encryption.

The C2 communication protocol is over HTTP and it has the malware version– 1.0.1. Which indicates it is at the early stages of development.

The RC4 algorithm is the only encryption algorithm used with different 64-byte keys based on the victim.

Following are the command handlers in Milum’s code

CodeMeaningFeatures
1ExecutionSilently execute received interpreter command and return result through pipe
2Server to clientDecode received content in “data” JSON field and drop to file mentioned in “path” field
3Client to serverEncode file mentioned in received command “path” field to send it
4File infoGet file attributes: hidden, read only, archive, system or executable
5CleanupGenerate and run batch script to delete itself
6Command resultGet command execution status
7System informationValidate target with Windows version, architecture (32- or 64-bit), host and user name, installed security products (with WQL request “Select From AntiVirusProduct WHERE displayName <>’Windows Defender’”)
8Directory listGet info about files in directory: hidden, read only, archive, system or executable
9UpdateGet the new version and remove the old one

Based on the C2 domains(upiserversys1212[.]com) analysis the majority of the visitor’s IP is from the Middle East.

To launch the campaign attackers rented virtual private servers (VPS) from OVH and registered domains with Proxy anonymization service.

The targeted nature seems to be clear, but the targeting itself might be limited by our visibility, researchers concluded.

WildPressure appears to be a new group and their operation found to be unique and it doesn’t share any similarities with other malware campaigns.

Gurubaran
Gurubaran
Gurubaran is a co-founder of Cyber Security News and GBHackers On Security. He has 10+ years of experience as a Security Consultant, Editor, and Analyst in cybersecurity, technology, and communications.

Latest articles

OpenAI Data Breach – Threat Actor Allegedly Claims 20 Million Logins for Sale

OpenAI may have become the latest high-profile target of a significant data breach.A...

Lumma Stealer Attacking Windows Users In India With Fake Captcha Pages

Cybersecurity experts are raising alarms over a new wave of attacks targeting Windows users...

Beware of Lazarus LinkedIn Recruiting Scam Targeting Org’s to Deliver Malware

A new wave of cyberattacks orchestrated by the North Korea-linked Lazarus Group has been...

F5 BIG-IP SNMP Flaw Allows Attackers to Launch DoS Attacks

A recently disclosed vulnerability in F5's BIG-IP systems has raised alarm within the cybersecurity...

Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Free Webinar - Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Recent attacks like Polyfill[.]io show how compromised third-party components become backdoors for hackers. PCI DSS 4.0’s Requirement 6.4.3 mandates stricter browser script controls, while Requirement 12.8 focuses on securing third-party providers.

Join Vivekanand Gopalan (VP of Products – Indusface) and Phani Deepak Akella (VP of Marketing – Indusface) as they break down these compliance requirements and share strategies to protect your applications from supply chain attacks.

Discussion points

Meeting PCI DSS 4.0 mandates.
Blocking malicious components and unauthorized JavaScript execution.
PIdentifying attack surfaces from third-party dependencies.
Preventing man-in-the-browser attacks with proactive monitoring.

More like this

New Banking Attacking Users of Indian banks to Steal Aadhar, PAN, ATM & Credit Card PINs

A sophisticated malware campaign, dubbed "FatBoyPanel," has been uncovered by cybersecurity researchers, targeting users...

New Attack Method Bypasses EDR with Low Privileged Access

A new endpoint detection and response (EDR) evasion technique has been identified that allows...

ValleyRAT Attacking Org’s Accounting Department with New Delivery Techniques

A concerning uptick in cyberattacks has emerged with ValleyRAT, a Remote Access Trojan (RAT)...