Turla Group Updated ComRAT Malware to Use Gmail web Interface for Command and Control

The ComRAT malware is a remote administration tool and is used by the Turla hacker group. It was first spotted in November 2014. The Trula hacker group is active for more than ten years.

ComRAT malware also known as Agent.BTZ, the first version of it was released in 2007. It becomes infamous after it was used to breach the US military in 2008.

Turla’s operators known for maintaining a large arsenal of malware includes a rootkit, several complex backdoors aimed at different platforms, including Microsoft Exchange mail servers, and a large range of tools to enable pivoting on a network.

ComRAT Malware

A new variant of ComRAT malware found by researchers in 2017 and it is active as recently as January 2020. Three targets were identified; two of them are ministries of Foreign Affairs and a national parliament.

The main use of the ComRAT malware is to steal confidential documents, in one such case researchers observed that “deployed a .NET executable to interact with the victim’s central MS SQL Server database containing the organization’s documents.”

In addition to document stealing the hacker group runs various commands to gather information about services such as “Active Directory groups or users, the network, or Microsoft Windows configurations such as the group policies.”

ComRAT Malware Operation

The most recently compiled ComRAT malware dated November 2019, according to the ESET telemetry, the malware was installed using an existing foothold such as compromised credentials or via another Turla backdoor.

All the files associated with ComRAT are stored in a Virtual File System and the VFS is encrypted using AES-256 in XTS mode.

Two Command and Control channels

  • HTTP – The malware makes HTTP requests to its C&C server.
  • Email – Uses the Gmail web interface to receive commands and exfiltrate data
Gmail used for C&C

The most interesting feature with the new version of the malware uses the Gmail web UI to receive commands and exfiltrate data.

So that attackers can bypass some security solutions as the communication not from the malicious domains. Eset published a detailed report with Indicators of compromise.

You can follow us on LinkedinTwitterFacebook for daily Cybersecurity and hacking news updates.

Gurubaran

Gurubaran is a co-founder of Cyber Security News and GBHackers On Security. He has 10+ years of experience as a Security Consultant, Editor, and Analyst in cybersecurity, technology, and communications.

Recent Posts

Implementing Identity First Security for Zero Trust Architectures

Zero Trust is a security framework that operates under the assumption that no implicit trust…

6 hours ago

InvokeADCheck – New Powershell Module for Active Directory Assessment

Orange Cyberdefense has announced the development of InvokeADCheck, a new PowerShell module designed to streamline…

9 hours ago

Detecting Malicious Activities With Traffic Distribution Systems

Traffic Distribution Systems (TDS) have emerged as critical tools for both legitimate and malicious purposes,…

9 hours ago

Hackers Deploy Advanced Social Engineering Tactics in Phishing Attacks

Cybercriminals are evolving their phishing methods, employing more sophisticated social engineering tactics to deceive their…

9 hours ago

Cybercriminals Exploit Compromised Email Servers for Fraudulent Campaigns

Trend Micro's Managed XDR team has recently investigated a sophisticated Business Email Compromise (BEC) attack…

9 hours ago

Identifying Cyber Attack Patterns Through Threat Actor Infrastructure Analysis

Kudelski Security Research recently published an article detailing advanced methods for tracking and analyzing threat…

9 hours ago