Thursday, February 13, 2025
Homecyber securityCybercriminals Exploit Pyramid Pentesting Tool for Covert C2 Communications

Cybercriminals Exploit Pyramid Pentesting Tool for Covert C2 Communications

Published on

SIEM as a Service

Follow Us on Google News

Cybersecurity analysts have identified that hackers are leveraging the open-source Pyramid pentesting tool to establish stealthy command-and-control (C2) communications.

Originally designed as a post-exploitation framework for penetration testers, Pyramid has become an attractive option for malicious actors due to its ability to evade detection by endpoint security tools.

The tool, first released on GitHub in 2023, is built on Python and uses a lightweight HTTP/S server capable of delivering encrypted payloads, blending seamlessly with legitimate Python activity.

The framework supports in-memory execution of tools like BloodHound, secretsdump, and LaZagne, which allows attackers to operate within the context of signed Python interpreters.

This technique bypasses traditional endpoint detection and response (EDR) systems, making Pyramid a powerful asset for adversaries seeking to minimize their digital footprint.

Detection Challenges

Pyramid’s design includes features that complicate detection efforts.

Its HTTP/S server employs Basic HTTP authentication and returns distinctive response headers when accessed without valid credentials.

Pentesting Tool
Screenshot of Pyramid README.

For instance, the server may return “401 Unauthorized” status codes along with specific headers such as Server: BaseHTTP/0.6 Python/3.10.4 and WWW-Authenticate: Basic realm="Demo Realm".

The JSON response body also contains unique error messages like {"success": false, "error": "No auth header received"}.

Security researchers have developed network signatures based on these characteristics to identify Pyramid-related infrastructure.

By combining attributes such as HTTP status codes, response body hashes, and server headers, defenders can craft structured queries to detect servers running Pyramid.

Recent scans using these parameters have uncovered a limited number of IP addresses associated with the tool, reinforcing the specificity of this detection approach.

Recent Findings

Several IP addresses linked to Pyramid servers have been identified in recent campaigns.

Notably, some of these servers were associated with domains resembling legitimate organizations, potentially indicating attempts at phishing or drive-by downloads.

For example, one server resolving to domains similar to an internet marketing service in Poland was flagged but has yet to be tied to malicious samples.

The misuse of open-source tools like Pyramid underscores the dual-edged nature of publicly available offensive security frameworks.

While they provide valuable resources for ethical penetration testing, their accessibility also enables threat actors to repurpose them for malicious operations.

This trend highlights the importance of proactive threat hunting and robust detection strategies.

As adversaries increasingly rely on open-source tools like Pyramid for stealthy C2 communications, cybersecurity teams must adapt their defenses.

By focusing on unique network artifacts such as authentication challenges and response headers, defenders can enhance detection fidelity while minimizing false positives.

The ability to identify and monitor such infrastructure provides an early warning system against emerging threats.

With the continued evolution of tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs), staying ahead requires constant vigilance and innovation in threat detection methodologies.

Investigate Real-World Malicious Links & Phishing Attacks With Threat Intelligence Lookup - Try for Free

Aman Mishra
Aman Mishra
Aman Mishra is a Security and privacy Reporter covering various data breach, cyber crime, malware, & vulnerability.

Latest articles

Arbitrary File Upload Vulnerability in WordPress Plugin Let Attackers Hack 30,000 Website

A subgroup of the Russian state-sponsored hacking group Seashell Blizzard, also known as Sandworm,...

BadPilot Attacking Network Devices to Expand Russian Seashell Blizzard’s Attacks

A newly uncovered cyber campaign, dubbed "BadPilot," has been linked to a subgroup of...

Threat Actors in Russia, China, and Iran Targeting Local communities in the U.S

Foreign adversaries, including Russia, China, and Iran, are intensifying their efforts to manipulate public...

New Phishing Attacks Abuses Webflow CDN & CAPTCHAs to Steal Credit Card details

Netskope Threat Labs has uncovered a sophisticated phishing campaign targeting users across various industries,...

Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Free Webinar - Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Recent attacks like Polyfill[.]io show how compromised third-party components become backdoors for hackers. PCI DSS 4.0’s Requirement 6.4.3 mandates stricter browser script controls, while Requirement 12.8 focuses on securing third-party providers.

Join Vivekanand Gopalan (VP of Products – Indusface) and Phani Deepak Akella (VP of Marketing – Indusface) as they break down these compliance requirements and share strategies to protect your applications from supply chain attacks.

Discussion points

Meeting PCI DSS 4.0 mandates.
Blocking malicious components and unauthorized JavaScript execution.
PIdentifying attack surfaces from third-party dependencies.
Preventing man-in-the-browser attacks with proactive monitoring.

More like this

Arbitrary File Upload Vulnerability in WordPress Plugin Let Attackers Hack 30,000 Website

A subgroup of the Russian state-sponsored hacking group Seashell Blizzard, also known as Sandworm,...

BadPilot Attacking Network Devices to Expand Russian Seashell Blizzard’s Attacks

A newly uncovered cyber campaign, dubbed "BadPilot," has been linked to a subgroup of...

Threat Actors in Russia, China, and Iran Targeting Local communities in the U.S

Foreign adversaries, including Russia, China, and Iran, are intensifying their efforts to manipulate public...