Monday, April 7, 2025
HomeCyber Security NewsAmazon Sued For Tricking Users to Get Prime Subscriptions

Amazon Sued For Tricking Users to Get Prime Subscriptions

Published on

SIEM as a Service

Follow Us on Google News

In the most extreme action taken against the firm by the agency’s chair, Lina Khan, the Federal Trade Commission filed a lawsuit against Amazon on Wednesday, accusing it of illegally pressuring customers to subscribe to its Prime membership and making it difficult for them to quit.

The FTC claimed in its lawsuit that Amazon had “duped millions of consumers” into signing up for Prime by employing “manipulative, coercive, or deceptive” website design techniques known as “dark patterns.”

Additionally, Amazon “knowingly complicated” the cancellation process with burdensome steps when customers wished to cancel.

- Advertisement - Google News

Lengthy Procedure To Cancel Their Prime Membership 

Over 200 million individuals worldwide are Prime subscribers. The subscription service costs $139 a year or $14.99 a month in the US and £95 a year in the UK.

It includes shipping benefits, access to streaming films, and other advantages.

Because “those changes would also negatively affect Amazon’s bottom line,” the agency claimed in the lawsuit filed in federal court in Seattle, the company tried to make it impossible for consumers to opt out of auto-enrolment.

It also claimed that Amazon forced consumers who wanted to cancel through a time-consuming “four-page, six-click, fifteen option” procedure, which the FTC dubbed “Iliad” about the Greek classic about the “long, arduous Trojan War.”

The FTC claimed that although Amazon changed the cancellation procedure soon before the case was filed, the company’s actions violated consumer protection laws.

“Amazon tricked and trapped people into recurring subscriptions without their consent, not only frustrating users but also costing them significant money,” FTC reports.

Amazon was aware that it was signing up customers for Prime without getting their permission and that it was challenging for them to understand the complex canceling process.

The Company neglected to take any significant action to rectify the problems and claimed the lawsuit until they were well aware of the FTC’s inquiry.

The FTC requests a court order requiring Amazon to alter its practices and specific monetary penalties.

Response from Amazon to the Issue

Amazon said that when the case was unexpectedly filed, it had been resolving the problems with the agency.

“The truth is that customers love Prime, and by design, we make it clear and simple for customers to both sign up for or cancel their Prime membership,” the company said.

Amazon and the F.T.C. recently resolved legal disputes. To resolve commission allegations that its Alexa home assistant devices had improperly gathered children’s data, the corporation agreed to pay $25 million last month.

 The business also reached a privacy settlement with the F.T.C. involving its Ring home security division.

Manage and Secure Your Endpoints Efficiently – Free Download

Gurubaran
Gurubaran
Gurubaran is a co-founder of Cyber Security News and GBHackers On Security. He has 10+ years of experience as a Security Consultant, Editor, and Analyst in cybersecurity, technology, and communications.

Latest articles

Threat Actors Exploit Fake CAPTCHAs and Cloudflare Turnstile to Distribute LegionLoader

In a sophisticated attack targeting individuals searching for PDF documents online, cybercriminals are using...

HellCat, Rey, and Grep Groups Dispute Claims in Orange and HighWire Press Cases

SuspectFile.com has uncovered a complex web of overlapping claims and accusations within the cybercrime...

AI Surpasses Elite Red Teams in Crafting Effective Spear Phishing Attacks

In a groundbreaking development in the field of cybersecurity, AI has reached a pivotal...

Threat Actors Use Windows Screensaver Files as Malware Delivery Method

Cybersecurity experts at Symantec have uncovered a sophisticated phishing campaign targeting various sectors across...

Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Free Webinar - Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Recent attacks like Polyfill[.]io show how compromised third-party components become backdoors for hackers. PCI DSS 4.0’s Requirement 6.4.3 mandates stricter browser script controls, while Requirement 12.8 focuses on securing third-party providers.

Join Vivekanand Gopalan (VP of Products – Indusface) and Phani Deepak Akella (VP of Marketing – Indusface) as they break down these compliance requirements and share strategies to protect your applications from supply chain attacks.

Discussion points

Meeting PCI DSS 4.0 mandates.
Blocking malicious components and unauthorized JavaScript execution.
PIdentifying attack surfaces from third-party dependencies.
Preventing man-in-the-browser attacks with proactive monitoring.

More like this

Threat Actors Exploit Fake CAPTCHAs and Cloudflare Turnstile to Distribute LegionLoader

In a sophisticated attack targeting individuals searching for PDF documents online, cybercriminals are using...

HellCat, Rey, and Grep Groups Dispute Claims in Orange and HighWire Press Cases

SuspectFile.com has uncovered a complex web of overlapping claims and accusations within the cybercrime...

AI Surpasses Elite Red Teams in Crafting Effective Spear Phishing Attacks

In a groundbreaking development in the field of cybersecurity, AI has reached a pivotal...