Thursday, April 3, 2025
HomeCVE/vulnerabilityNew ARM 'TIKTAG' Attack Impacts Google Chrome, Linux Systems

New ARM ‘TIKTAG’ Attack Impacts Google Chrome, Linux Systems

Published on

SIEM as a Service

Follow Us on Google News

Memory corruption lets attackers hijack control flow, execute code, elevate privileges, and leak data.

ARM’s Memory Tagging Extension (MTE) aims to mitigate by tagging memory and checking tags on access. 

The following researchers found speculative execution attacks can leak MTE tags via new TIKTAG gadgets exploiting branch prediction, prefetchers, and store-to-load forwarding. 

  • Juhee Kim from Seoul National University
  • Jinbum Park from Samsung Research
  • Sihyeon Roh from Seoul National University
  • Jaeyoung Chung from Seoul National University
  • Youngjoo Lee from Seoul National University
  • Taesoo Kim from Samsung Research and Georgia Institute of Technology
  • Byoungyoung Lee from Seoul National University

Cybersecurity analysts developed real-world attacks against Chrome, and Linux kernel leaking tags over 95% success in less than 4 seconds.

The findings show that designing MTE mitigations requires considering speculative execution vulnerabilities. 

However, it’s been reported to ARM, Google, and Android. As MTE adoption grows, understanding these issues is crucial for secure deployment.

Scan Your Business Email Inbox to Find Advanced Email Threats - Try AI-Powered Free Threat Scan

Technical Analysis

Security researchers explore an attacker model targeting systems with Memory Tagging Extension (MTE), which uses random tags for memory allocations and tag checks on every memory access. 

The attacker knows memory corruption vulnerabilities and aims to bypass MTE by learning the tag for a memory address, allowing exploitation without crashing the process. 

Researchers present two speculative execution gadgets that leak MTE tags by leveraging microarchitectural behaviors affected by tag check results, such as data prefetching, speculative execution, and store-to-load forwarding:-

  • TIKTAG-v1
  • TIKTAG-v2

Mitigations involve hardware changes to separate these behaviors from tag checks or software techniques like speculation barriers.

An MTE tag leakage template (Source – Arxiv)

The researchers present real-world attacks that use the TIKTAG speculative execution gadget to bypass Memory Tagging Extension (MTE) protections in Google Chrome and the Linux kernel.

They created a TIKTAG-v2 gadget in the V8 JavaScript engine for Chrome to enable leaking MTE tags, which leads to over 97% successful linear overflow and use after free vulnerability exploitation.

The Linux kernel’s code includes a TIKTAG-v1 gadget that can leak tags across the user and kernel boundaries.

By doing so, they manage to circumvent kernel MTE protections regarding buffer overflow and use-after-free with 97% effectiveness.

For example, mitigations include strengthening speculative sandboxes, inserting barriers between speculations, and avoiding constructing gadgets using patterns.

These attacks from security experts show that speculative execution must be considered when creating some hardware-enforced security mechanisms.

Free Webinar! 3 Security Trends to Maximize MSP Growth -> Register For Free

Raga Varshini
Raga Varshini
Varshini is a Cyber Security expert in Threat Analysis, Vulnerability Assessment, and Research. Passionate about staying ahead of emerging Threats and Technologies.

Latest articles

Hackers Selling SnowDog RAT Malware With Remote Control Capabilities Online

A sophisticated remote access trojan (RAT) dubbed SnowDog has surfaced on underground cybercrime forums, prompting alarms...

Authorities Shut Down Kidflix Child Abuse Platform in Major Takedown

In one of the most significant operations against child sexual exploitation in recent history,...

Massive GitHub Leak: 39M API Keys & Credentials Exposed – How to Strengthen Security

Over 39 million API keys, credentials, and other sensitive secrets were exposed on GitHub...

GoResolver: A Powerful New Tool for Analyzing Golang Malware

Analyzing malware has become increasingly challenging, especially with the growing popularity of programming languages...

Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Free Webinar - Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Recent attacks like Polyfill[.]io show how compromised third-party components become backdoors for hackers. PCI DSS 4.0’s Requirement 6.4.3 mandates stricter browser script controls, while Requirement 12.8 focuses on securing third-party providers.

Join Vivekanand Gopalan (VP of Products – Indusface) and Phani Deepak Akella (VP of Marketing – Indusface) as they break down these compliance requirements and share strategies to protect your applications from supply chain attacks.

Discussion points

Meeting PCI DSS 4.0 mandates.
Blocking malicious components and unauthorized JavaScript execution.
PIdentifying attack surfaces from third-party dependencies.
Preventing man-in-the-browser attacks with proactive monitoring.

More like this

Hackers Selling SnowDog RAT Malware With Remote Control Capabilities Online

A sophisticated remote access trojan (RAT) dubbed SnowDog has surfaced on underground cybercrime forums, prompting alarms...

Authorities Shut Down Kidflix Child Abuse Platform in Major Takedown

In one of the most significant operations against child sexual exploitation in recent history,...

Massive GitHub Leak: 39M API Keys & Credentials Exposed – How to Strengthen Security

Over 39 million API keys, credentials, and other sensitive secrets were exposed on GitHub...