Tuesday, March 4, 2025
Homecyber securityLogShield: A New Framework that Detects the APT Attack Patterns

LogShield: A New Framework that Detects the APT Attack Patterns

Published on

SIEM as a Service

Follow Us on Google News

There have been several cases of GPT model-based detection for various attacks from system logs.

However, there has been no dedicated framework for detecting APTs as they use a low and slow approach to compromise the systems.

Security researchers have recently unveiled a cutting-edge framework known as LogShield. This innovative tool leverages the self-attention capabilities of transformers to identify attack patterns associated with Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs).

By analyzing network logs, LogShield can detect subtle indicators of APTs that may have otherwise gone unnoticed, providing a powerful defense against these sophisticated attacks.

According to the researchers, the efficiency of this framework has been reported to be 95% and 98%.

LogShield

The main purpose of using language models for detecting malicious events is because they have been designed to process large sequences of words or log data, which is useful when processing records of events on a cyber attack.

Document
Protect Your Storage With SafeGuard

Is Your Storage & Backup Systems Fully Protected? – Watch 40-second Tour of SafeGuard

StorageGuard scans, detects, and fixes security misconfigurations and vulnerabilities across hundreds of storage and backup devices.

Additionally, the self-attention mechanism of GPT models can assign different weights to different events based on their relativity to the APTs and can be adjusted concerning the event’s importance.

APT detection
APT detection LogShield

Machine learning techniques have been used to detect attack patterns instead of rule-based or signature-based attack detection methods, which have relatively low performance when detecting Zero-Day APTs.

Moreover, several deep learning-based methods have been explored to detect APT attacks.

Limitations of LogShield

Though LogShield has superior performance, there is a limitation to this framework. As it has high performance, it also comes with an increased memory consumption and longer computational time. As part of the research, LogShield and LSTM models have been used. 

However, after many experiments, efficiency was achieved with a 98% F1-score in APT detection.

A report about LogShield has been published, providing detailed information about the training models using their statistical data and other information.

Patch Manager Plus, the one-stop solution for automated updates of over 850 third-party applications: Try Free Trial.

Eswar
Eswar
Eswar is a Cyber security content editor with a passion for creating captivating and informative content. With years of experience under his belt in Cyber Security, he is covering Cyber Security News, technology and other news.

Latest articles

Hunters International Claims Tata Technologies Cyberattack

Multinational engineering and technology services firm Tata Technologies has reportedly fallen victim to a...

Authorities Seize $31 Million Linked to Crypto Exchange Hack

U.S. authorities announced the seizure of $31 million tied to the 2021 Uranium Finance...

Google, Meta, and Apple Power the World’s Biggest Surveillance System

Imagine a government that tracks your daily movements, monitors your communications, and catalogs your...

Docusnap for Windows Flaw Exposes Sensitive Data to Attackers

A recently disclosed vulnerability in Docusnap's Windows client software (CVE-2025-26849) enables attackers to decrypt...

Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Free Webinar - Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Recent attacks like Polyfill[.]io show how compromised third-party components become backdoors for hackers. PCI DSS 4.0’s Requirement 6.4.3 mandates stricter browser script controls, while Requirement 12.8 focuses on securing third-party providers.

Join Vivekanand Gopalan (VP of Products – Indusface) and Phani Deepak Akella (VP of Marketing – Indusface) as they break down these compliance requirements and share strategies to protect your applications from supply chain attacks.

Discussion points

Meeting PCI DSS 4.0 mandates.
Blocking malicious components and unauthorized JavaScript execution.
PIdentifying attack surfaces from third-party dependencies.
Preventing man-in-the-browser attacks with proactive monitoring.

More like this

Hunters International Claims Tata Technologies Cyberattack

Multinational engineering and technology services firm Tata Technologies has reportedly fallen victim to a...

Authorities Seize $31 Million Linked to Crypto Exchange Hack

U.S. authorities announced the seizure of $31 million tied to the 2021 Uranium Finance...

Google, Meta, and Apple Power the World’s Biggest Surveillance System

Imagine a government that tracks your daily movements, monitors your communications, and catalogs your...