Thursday, February 27, 2025
HomeCyber Security NewsNew Wi-Fi Jamming Attack Can Disable Specific Devices

New Wi-Fi Jamming Attack Can Disable Specific Devices

Published on

SIEM as a Service

Follow Us on Google News

A newly discovered Wi-Fi jamming technique enables attackers to selectively disconnect individual devices from networks with surgical precision, raising alarms across cybersecurity and telecommunications industries.

Researchers from Northeastern University and the University of Chicago uncovered this vulnerability in IEEE 802.11 protocols that underpin all modern Wi-Fi systems, demonstrating how targeted de-authentication attacks could disrupt smart homes, industrial IoT deployments, and emergency communication systems.

Illustration of the RIS operation principle
Illustration of the RIS operation principle

Technical Mechanism of the Attack

The attack exploits fundamental weaknesses in Wi-Fi’s de-authentication frame system, which routers use to formally disconnect devices from networks.

While traditional jamming methods flood frequencies with noise to create blanket disruption, this technique forges de-authentication packets that impersonate both the target device and the access point.

Illustration of the assumed system model

By cross-referencing MAC addresses and behavioral fingerprints (such as signal strength patterns and device-specific timing characteristics), attackers can single out specific smartphones, security cameras, or medical devices for disconnection while leaving other network users unaffected.

Dr. Emily Zhang, lead researcher at Northeastern’s Cybersecurity Institute, explained during a Black Hat Asia briefing: “The protocol assumes de-authentication requests originate from legitimate devices, but we’ve shown how easily these can be spoofed.

What makes this particularly dangerous is the ability to persistently block one device while the rest of the network operates normally, creating deniable disruptions”.

Real-World Impact Scenarios

During controlled experiments, the research team demonstrated several concerning applications:

  1. Medical Device Sabotage: An insulin pump using Wi-Fi connectivity was forcibly disconnected from its monitoring system for 43 minutes despite being 5 meters from the router.
  2. Industrial Espionage: Attackers selectively blocked security cameras at a factory while exfiltrating data from adjacent IoT sensors.
  3. Consumer Manipulation: Smart speakers lost connectivity during voice command execution, creating false “device failure” impressions while other household devices remained online.

The FCC has issued preliminary guidance urging device manufacturers to implement framework-layer mitigations, particularly for critical infrastructure components.

However, the wholesale replacement of vulnerable legacy devices could take decades given the estimated 12 billion Wi-Fi-enabled devices currently in use globally.

Current Wi-Fi security protocols lack native mechanisms to authenticate deauthentication frames, making detection exceptionally difficult.

The research team’s countermeasure prototype uses lattice-based cryptography to create digitally signed association frames, reducing unauthorized disconnection success rates from 98% to 12% in trials.

Network architecture adjustments show promise – implementing client-specific rotating identifiers instead of static MAC addresses increased attack complexity by 400% in lab environments.

Major chipset manufacturers including Broadcom and Qualcomm have committed to integrating these features in next-generation designs, but deployment timelines stretch into 2026.

Regulatory and Ethical Considerations

This vulnerability’s discovery has reignited debates about liability in connected device ecosystems. Unlike traditional cyberattacks requiring malware installation, these disruptions exploit fundamentally insecure protocol implementations.

Legal experts warn that impacted industries could face negligence lawsuits if security updates aren’t prioritized.

The research team collaborated with global CERT organizations to coordinate responsible disclosure across 23 affected chipset vendors.

Full technical details remain embargoed until defense mechanisms reach broad deployment, though proof-of-concept code leakage remains an ongoing concern.

As 6GHz Wi-Fi 6E networks expand, researchers emphasize that new protocols must bake in authentication at the packet level.

The IEEE has fast-tracked development of 802.11be (Wi-Fi 7) enhancements including quantum-resistant cryptographic signatures for management frames – a direct response to these findings.

Until then, network administrators are advised to implement client isolation, monitor deauthentication rates, and segment critical devices onto dedicated SSIDs.

This discovery underscores the fragility of legacy wireless standards in an increasingly connected world.

Collect Threat Intelligence on the Latest Malware and Phishing Attacks with ANY.RUN TI Lookup -> Try for free

Divya
Divya
Divya is a Senior Journalist at GBhackers covering Cyber Attacks, Threats, Breaches, Vulnerabilities and other happenings in the cyber world.

Latest articles

Authorities Arrested Hacker Behind 90 Major Data Breaches Worldwide

Cybersecurity firm Group-IB, alongside the Royal Thai Police and Singapore Police Force, announced the...

Cisco Nexus Vulnerability Allows Attackers to Inject Malicious Commands

Cisco Systems has issued a critical security advisory for a newly disclosed command injection...

GitLab Vulnerabilities Allow Attackers to Bypass Security and Run Arbitrary Scripts

GitLab has urgently released security updates to address multiple high-severity vulnerabilities in its platform...

LibreOffice Flaws Allow Attackers to Run Malicious Files on Windows

A high-severity security vulnerability (CVE-2025-0514) in LibreOffice, the widely used open-source office suite, has...

Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Free Webinar - Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Recent attacks like Polyfill[.]io show how compromised third-party components become backdoors for hackers. PCI DSS 4.0’s Requirement 6.4.3 mandates stricter browser script controls, while Requirement 12.8 focuses on securing third-party providers.

Join Vivekanand Gopalan (VP of Products – Indusface) and Phani Deepak Akella (VP of Marketing – Indusface) as they break down these compliance requirements and share strategies to protect your applications from supply chain attacks.

Discussion points

Meeting PCI DSS 4.0 mandates.
Blocking malicious components and unauthorized JavaScript execution.
PIdentifying attack surfaces from third-party dependencies.
Preventing man-in-the-browser attacks with proactive monitoring.

More like this

Authorities Arrested Hacker Behind 90 Major Data Breaches Worldwide

Cybersecurity firm Group-IB, alongside the Royal Thai Police and Singapore Police Force, announced the...

Cisco Nexus Vulnerability Allows Attackers to Inject Malicious Commands

Cisco Systems has issued a critical security advisory for a newly disclosed command injection...

GitLab Vulnerabilities Allow Attackers to Bypass Security and Run Arbitrary Scripts

GitLab has urgently released security updates to address multiple high-severity vulnerabilities in its platform...