Saturday, March 1, 2025
HomeBluetoothSweynTooth - 11 Bluetooth Bugs That Affected SoC Vendors Let Hackers to...

SweynTooth – 11 Bluetooth Bugs That Affected SoC Vendors Let Hackers to Crash The Device & Execute the Code Remotely

Published on

SIEM as a Service

Follow Us on Google News

A group of security researchers uncovered a 12 Bluetooth based vulnerabilities dubbed “SweynTooth” in BLE software development kits of seven major system-on-a-chip (SoC) vendors.

 BLE ( Bluetooth Low Energy) a technology developed for wireless communication with a set of many standardized protocols that provide remote connectivity and also specifically handles the battery life of the device different power consumption and usage capabilities.

We have recently reported another critical Bluetooth vulnerability discovered in the Android Bluetooth system that allows remote attackers to silently execute arbitrary code remotely and take the complete device control.

Now researchers from Singapore University of Technology and Design reported the new set of vulnerabilities in BLE SoC implementations allow attackers to perform deadlocks, crashes and buffer overflow or completely bypass security within the radio range and the different circumstances.

Also, SweynTooth vulnerabilities affected various IoT products in appliances such as smart-homes, wearables and environmental tracking or sensing, medical and logistics products.

SweynTooth
Some of the vulnerable IoT products

Vulnerable BLE SDKs sold by seven vendors of the following:

  • Texas Instruments
  • NXP
  • Cypress
  • Dialog Semiconductors
  • Microchip
  • STMicroelectronics
  • Telink Semiconductor

Type of Vulnerabilities

There are 3 types of major SweynTooth flaw identified in this research and each vulnerability impact the devices in different ways,

Crash :

Six Bluetooth vulnerabilities are addressed that lead to crash a device once the attacker triggers the vulnerabilities due to some incorrect code behavior or memory corruption.

According to the finding report, “when a buffer overflow on BLE reception buffer occurs. When a device crash occurs, they usually restart. However, such a restart capability depends on whether a correct hard fault handling mechanism was implemented in the product that uses the vulnerable BLE SoC.”

This vulnerability affected the vendors including Cypress, NXP, Dialog Semiconductors, Texas Instruments, Microchip, Telink Semiconductor.

Deadlock:

There are 3 vulnerabilities related to Deadlock type that affect the availability of the BLE connection without causing a hard fault or memory corruption.

Researchers explain that they usually occurred due to some improper synchronization between user code and the SDK firmware distributed by the SoC vendor, leaving the user code being stuck at some point.

There are 3 Vendors affected by these vulnerabilities: Cypress, NXP, STMicroelectronics.

3. Security Bypass:

Security bypass type Bluetooth vulnerability in SweynTooth consider as a “Critical” one and the vulnerability allows attackers in radio range to bypass the latest secure pairing mode of BLE.

Successfully exploit this vulnerability allow attack to perform an arbitrary read or write access to the device’s functions remotely.

Attackers also perform smart luggage lock that can be remotely locked or unlocked through a smartphone app.

This Zero LTK Installation security bypass Bluetooth vulnerability ( CVE-2019-19194 ) affected only Zero LTK Installation.

You can also read the detailed and in-depth technical details here.

Balaji
Balaji
BALAJI is an Ex-Security Researcher (Threat Research Labs) at Comodo Cybersecurity. Editor-in-Chief & Co-Founder - Cyber Security News & GBHackers On Security.

Latest articles

Chinese Hackers Breach Belgium State Security Service as Investigation Continues

Belgium’s State Security Service (VSSE) has suffered what is being described as its most...

Hacktivist Groups Emerge With Powerful Tools for Large-Scale Cyber Operations

Hacktivism, once synonymous with symbolic website defacements and distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks, has evolved...

New Pass-the-Cookie Attacks Bypass MFA, Giving Hackers Full Account Access

Multi-factor authentication (MFA), long considered a cornerstone of cybersecurity defense, is facing a formidable...

Chinese Hackers Exploit Check Point VPN Zero-Day to Target Organizations Globally

A sophisticated cyberespionage campaign linked to Chinese state-sponsored actors has exploited a previously patched...

Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Free Webinar - Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Recent attacks like Polyfill[.]io show how compromised third-party components become backdoors for hackers. PCI DSS 4.0’s Requirement 6.4.3 mandates stricter browser script controls, while Requirement 12.8 focuses on securing third-party providers.

Join Vivekanand Gopalan (VP of Products – Indusface) and Phani Deepak Akella (VP of Marketing – Indusface) as they break down these compliance requirements and share strategies to protect your applications from supply chain attacks.

Discussion points

Meeting PCI DSS 4.0 mandates.
Blocking malicious components and unauthorized JavaScript execution.
PIdentifying attack surfaces from third-party dependencies.
Preventing man-in-the-browser attacks with proactive monitoring.

More like this

PingAM Java Agent Vulnerability Allows Attackers to Bypass Security

A critical security flaw (CVE-2025-20059) has been identified in supported versions of Ping Identity’s...

Cisco Nexus Vulnerability Allows Attackers to Inject Malicious Commands

Cisco Systems has issued a critical security advisory for a newly disclosed command injection...

GitLab Vulnerabilities Allow Attackers to Bypass Security and Run Arbitrary Scripts

GitLab has urgently released security updates to address multiple high-severity vulnerabilities in its platform...