Saturday, March 8, 2025
HomeCyber Security NewsBeware !! Square & PayPal Mobile Point of Sales (POS) Devices Are...

Beware !! Square & PayPal Mobile Point of Sales (POS) Devices Are Extremely Vulnerable to Credit/Debit Card Data Theft

Published on

SIEM as a Service

Follow Us on Google News

Well known and popular card readers also known as POS devices that using in POS terminals are open to multiple critical attack vectors that put credit/debit card at high risk to steal the card data.

Two Security researchers Leigh-Anne Galloway & Timur Yunusov take the project that involved to analyze across the US and Europ using seven card readers in that belongs to different vendors such as iZettle, PayPal, Square.

They uncovered that more than half of the Mobile Point of Sales terminals are vulnerable to some form of attack and they identified 2 terminals could allow to sending of arbitrary commands by attackers.

Once attackers exploit the vulnerabilities then it provides full access to the terminals operating system that leads an attacker to enable plain text mode from encrypted Transaction to collect the PIN from Victims.

Attack vectors are using social engineering techniques to force a cardholder to use a less secure method of payment, such as mag-stripe.

Another method that is used to display a “Payment declined” message in order to make the cardholder to carry out additional transactions.

According to Researchers, We identified five terminals that are vulnerable to amount modification for mag-stripe transactions. also, you can see their Video presentation at DEFCON conference.

“This vulnerability can be used by a fraudulent merchant to force a cardholder to approve a much higher value amount. During the transaction, the merchant displays a different, lower amount on the card reader, and another higher amount is sent to the Mobile Point of Sales provider for approval.”

The team also found that it’s possible to carry out a man-in-the-middle attack using this Bluetooth access to intercept the HTTPS traffic between the mobile application and the payment server due to the vulnerabilities that exist in the five terminals.

You can also see the full white paper and slides presentation regarding this whole research.

Also Read:

Natural Disaster Related Phishing Scam Abusing Microsoft Azure to Steal login Credentials & Credit Card Numbers

Dark Web Malware Builder Allow Attackers To Create Malware That Steals Passwords & Credit Card Data

Balaji
Balaji
BALAJI is an Ex-Security Researcher (Threat Research Labs) at Comodo Cybersecurity. Editor-in-Chief & Co-Founder - Cyber Security News & GBHackers On Security.

Latest articles

Lumma Stealer Using Fake Google Meet & Windows Update Sites to Launch “Click Fix” Style Attack

Cybersecurity researchers continue to track sophisticated "Click Fix" style distribution campaigns that deliver the...

Fake BianLian Ransom Demands Sent via Physical Letters to U.S. Firms

In a novel and concerning development, multiple U.S. organizations have reported receiving suspicious physical...

Strela Stealer Malware Attack Microsoft Outlook Users for Credential Theft

The cybersecurity landscape has recently been impacted by the emergence of the Strela Stealer...

New PyPI Malware Targets Developers to Steal Ethereum Wallets

A recent discovery by the Socket Research Team has unveiled a malicious PyPI package...

Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Free Webinar - Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Recent attacks like Polyfill[.]io show how compromised third-party components become backdoors for hackers. PCI DSS 4.0’s Requirement 6.4.3 mandates stricter browser script controls, while Requirement 12.8 focuses on securing third-party providers.

Join Vivekanand Gopalan (VP of Products – Indusface) and Phani Deepak Akella (VP of Marketing – Indusface) as they break down these compliance requirements and share strategies to protect your applications from supply chain attacks.

Discussion points

Meeting PCI DSS 4.0 mandates.
Blocking malicious components and unauthorized JavaScript execution.
PIdentifying attack surfaces from third-party dependencies.
Preventing man-in-the-browser attacks with proactive monitoring.

More like this

Lumma Stealer Using Fake Google Meet & Windows Update Sites to Launch “Click Fix” Style Attack

Cybersecurity researchers continue to track sophisticated "Click Fix" style distribution campaigns that deliver the...

Fake BianLian Ransom Demands Sent via Physical Letters to U.S. Firms

In a novel and concerning development, multiple U.S. organizations have reported receiving suspicious physical...

Strela Stealer Malware Attack Microsoft Outlook Users for Credential Theft

The cybersecurity landscape has recently been impacted by the emergence of the Strela Stealer...