Wednesday, March 12, 2025
Homecyber securityBlind Eagle Hackers Exploit Google Drive, Dropbox & GitHub to Evade Security...

Blind Eagle Hackers Exploit Google Drive, Dropbox & GitHub to Evade Security Measures

Published on

SIEM as a Service

Follow Us on Google News

In a recent cyber campaign, the notorious threat actor group Blind Eagle, also known as APT-C-36, has been leveraging trusted cloud platforms like Google Drive, Dropbox, GitHub, and Bitbucket to distribute malware and evade traditional security defenses.

This sophisticated approach allows them to bypass detection by disguising malicious files as harmless ones hosted on these platforms.

Blind Eagle’s tactics have proven highly effective, with over 9,000 infections reported in just one week from a single campaign.

Exploiting Security Patches for Stealthy Attacks

Blind Eagle’s ability to quickly adapt and weaponize security patches has raised significant concerns.

Just six days after Microsoft patched the CVE-2024-43451 vulnerability, the group began using a similar technique involving malicious .url files to track and compromise victims.

This method requires minimal user interaction, as simply accessing the file can trigger a WebDAV request, notifying attackers that the file has been accessed.

If the victim clicks on the file, the next-stage payload is downloaded and executed, leading to a full-blown system compromise.

The stealth of this method makes detection difficult, as it does not require users to open attachments or enable macros like traditional malware.

The Full Attack Chain and Defensive Measures

Once the malware is executed, it deploys Remcos RAT, a remote access trojan that grants attackers complete control over the infected system.

According to Check Point research Report, this allows for data theft, remote execution, and persistent access.

Blind Eagle Hackers
How Blind Eagle is Using .URL Files to Target Victims

To mitigate these threats, organizations must adopt proactive defense strategies.

Strengthening email security is crucial, as Blind Eagle primarily relies on phishing emails to deliver payloads.

Implementing real-time endpoint protection and monitoring web traffic can also help detect and block suspicious file interactions.

Additionally, enhancing security awareness training for employees is vital, as they remain a vulnerable link in cybersecurity.

The rapid adaptation of Blind Eagle highlights a worrying trend in modern cyber warfare, where threat actors are no longer waiting for zero-day vulnerabilities but are instead closely monitoring security patches to mimic or repurpose exploit behavior.

This underscores the need for accelerated patch management and AI-driven threat prevention solutions to stay ahead of evolving threats.

As cyber threats continue to grow in sophistication, organizations must move beyond traditional security models to effectively counter these advanced persistent threats.

Are you from SOC/DFIR Teams? – Analyse Malware Incidents & get live Access with ANY.RUN -> Start Now for Free.

Aman Mishra
Aman Mishra
Aman Mishra is a Security and privacy Reporter covering various data breach, cyber crime, malware, & vulnerability.

Latest articles

Jaguar Land Rover Allegedly Hacked – 700 Internal Documents Including Source Code Leaked

A threat actor known as "Rey" has come forward on a prominent dark web...

CISA Warns of Windows NTFS Vulnerability Exploited for Data Theft

The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) highlighted a critical vulnerability in Microsoft Windows'...

Zoom Client Security Flaws Could Lead to Data Breaches

Recent security bulletins from Zoom have highlighted several high-severity vulnerabilities in their client software,...

CISA Alerts on Active Exploitation of Microsoft Windows MMC Vulnerability

The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has warned of the active exploitation of...

Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Free Webinar - Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Recent attacks like Polyfill[.]io show how compromised third-party components become backdoors for hackers. PCI DSS 4.0’s Requirement 6.4.3 mandates stricter browser script controls, while Requirement 12.8 focuses on securing third-party providers.

Join Vivekanand Gopalan (VP of Products – Indusface) and Phani Deepak Akella (VP of Marketing – Indusface) as they break down these compliance requirements and share strategies to protect your applications from supply chain attacks.

Discussion points

Meeting PCI DSS 4.0 mandates.
Blocking malicious components and unauthorized JavaScript execution.
PIdentifying attack surfaces from third-party dependencies.
Preventing man-in-the-browser attacks with proactive monitoring.

More like this

Jaguar Land Rover Allegedly Hacked – 700 Internal Documents Including Source Code Leaked

A threat actor known as "Rey" has come forward on a prominent dark web...

CISA Warns of Windows NTFS Vulnerability Exploited for Data Theft

The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) highlighted a critical vulnerability in Microsoft Windows'...

Zoom Client Security Flaws Could Lead to Data Breaches

Recent security bulletins from Zoom have highlighted several high-severity vulnerabilities in their client software,...