Wednesday, February 26, 2025
HomeAnti VirusDarkGate Gained Popularity for its Covert Nature and Antivirus Evasion

DarkGate Gained Popularity for its Covert Nature and Antivirus Evasion

Published on

SIEM as a Service

Follow Us on Google News

DarkGate, a sophisticated Malware-as-a-Service (MaaS) offered by the enigmatic RastaFarEye persona, has surged in prominence.

The malware is known for abusing Microsoft Teams and MSI files to compromise target systems. 

This Sekoia report delves into its ominous capabilities, examining its deployment by threat actors like TA577 and Ducktail.

DarkGate employs ingenious data obfuscation techniques, including base64 encoding with a dual-alphabet approach. 

Unraveling its inner workings reveals a TStringList configuration stored in PE, challenging analysts to decode and comprehend.

Document
Free Webinar

Live API Attack Simulation Webinar

In the upcoming webinar, Karthik Krishnamoorthy, CTO and Vivek Gopalan, VP of Products at Indusface demonstrate how APIs could be hacked. The session will cover: an exploit of OWASP API Top 10 vulnerability, a brute force account take-over (ATO) attack on API, a DDoS attack on an API, how a WAAP could bolster security over an API gateway

Command and Control Evasion Tactics

The malware communicates covertly with the attacker’s server over HTTP, employing obfuscated messages. 

A dynamic C2 port strategy and a unique approach to action IDs contribute to DarkGate’s resilient command and control infrastructure.

Darkgate Infection chain

DarkGate unleashes a range of Remote Access Trojan (RAT) tactics, from reverse shell implementations to PowerShell script executions, reads the report.

Its keylogger prowess, Discord token hunting, and remote desktop access through hidden Virtual Network Computing (hVNC) pose significant threats.

The malware employs Union API, dynamic API resolution, and LOLBAS DLL loading to elude traditional antivirus solutions. 

Its APC injection via NtTestAlert further reduces its footprint, while environment detection ensures adaptability to diverse host configurations.

DarkGate exhibits multiple persistence techniques, utilizing LNK files, registry keys, and DLL loading. 

Its privilege escalation methods range from PsExec restarts to raw stub execution, ensuring sustained access to compromised hosts.

Post-Compromission Hunting

Hunting for DarkGate traces unveils a plethora of artifacts, from registry keys to log and debug files. 

Vigilance in monitoring temporary directories and specific file paths is crucial for identifying and mitigating DarkGate infections.

DarkGate’s advanced development and diverse functionalities make it a formidable threat. 

Despite leveraging open-source PoCs and established tools, its unique amalgamation of techniques demands continual scrutiny. 

Organizations must remain vigilant, as DarkGate persists as a significant menace in the cybercrime landscape.

Experience how StorageGuard eliminates the security blind spots in your storage systems by trying a 14-day free trial.

Gurubaran
Gurubaran
Gurubaran is a co-founder of Cyber Security News and GBHackers On Security. He has 10+ years of experience as a Security Consultant, Editor, and Analyst in cybersecurity, technology, and communications.

Latest articles

MITRE Releases OCCULT Framework to Address AI Security Challenges

MITRE has unveiled the Offensive Cyber Capability Unified LLM Testing (OCCULT) framework, a groundbreaking...

Genea IVF Clinic Cyberattack Threatens Thousands of Patient Records

A significant cybersecurity breach at Genea, one of Australia’s largest in vitro fertilization (IVF)...

GRUB2 Flaws Expose Millions of Linux Devices to Exploitation

A critical set of 20 security vulnerabilities in GRUB2, the widely used bootloader for...

Orange Communication Breached – Hackers Allegedly Claim 380,000 Email Records Exposed

Telecommunications provider Orange Communication faces a potential data breach after a threat actor using the pseudonym “Rey”...

Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Free Webinar - Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Recent attacks like Polyfill[.]io show how compromised third-party components become backdoors for hackers. PCI DSS 4.0’s Requirement 6.4.3 mandates stricter browser script controls, while Requirement 12.8 focuses on securing third-party providers.

Join Vivekanand Gopalan (VP of Products – Indusface) and Phani Deepak Akella (VP of Marketing – Indusface) as they break down these compliance requirements and share strategies to protect your applications from supply chain attacks.

Discussion points

Meeting PCI DSS 4.0 mandates.
Blocking malicious components and unauthorized JavaScript execution.
PIdentifying attack surfaces from third-party dependencies.
Preventing man-in-the-browser attacks with proactive monitoring.

More like this

MITRE Releases OCCULT Framework to Address AI Security Challenges

MITRE has unveiled the Offensive Cyber Capability Unified LLM Testing (OCCULT) framework, a groundbreaking...

Genea IVF Clinic Cyberattack Threatens Thousands of Patient Records

A significant cybersecurity breach at Genea, one of Australia’s largest in vitro fertilization (IVF)...

GRUB2 Flaws Expose Millions of Linux Devices to Exploitation

A critical set of 20 security vulnerabilities in GRUB2, the widely used bootloader for...