Saturday, April 5, 2025
HomeMalwareFontOnLake - Previously Unknown Malware Attack Linux Systems

FontOnLake – Previously Unknown Malware Attack Linux Systems

Published on

SIEM as a Service

Follow Us on Google News

A new modular Linux malware has been recently detected by ESET that is dubbed as FontOnLake. And this malware has many features, one of them is “well-designed modules.”

This feature is very well designed and is continuously being updated with an extensive range of skills, which generally indicates an active development stage.

However, the malicious code was utilized by the threat actors to negotiate all the data from infected systems and performances as a proxy server.

Lurking under legit utilities

FontOnLake is quite dangerous in nature, as the malware has different modules that communicate with one another and simply allow communication with malware operators, after doing that it steals sensitive data, and keeps itself hidden on the system.

FontOnLake is likely practiced in targeted attacks by operators that are adequately careful to utilize the unique command and control (C2) servers for samples and different non-standard ports.

Components of FontOnLake

FontOnLake’s components have been divided into three following groups that generally communicate with each other, and here we have mentioned them below:-

  • Trojanized applications 
  • Backdoors 
  • Rootkits

Trojanized apps and Rootkits

In this malware, the threat actors have used several trojanized apps to load custom backdoor as well as rootkit modules. All the applications that are present in this malware serve as a constancy method

Since they are mostly used in start-ups, and not only this even all the trojanized files are standard Linux utilities.

There are two different versions of the rootkit, and those are used only one at a time. However, there are some similar functions of both the rootkit that were being discovered, and here we have mentioned them below:-

  • Process hiding
  • File hiding
  • Hiding itself
  • Hiding network connections
  • Exposing the collected credentials to its backdoor
  • Performing port forwarding
  • Magic packets reception

Backdoors

In this malware, there are three different backdoors that are written in C++, and all the backdoors exfiltrate the data that has been collected. All these different backdoors are not applied together on one negotiated system. 

Apart from this, all the backdoors use custom heartbeat commands that are probably sent and received regularly so that the connection stays alive.

The operators of this malware are well trained and know the exact way of implementing the attack. While most of the features of the malware are specifically designed to hide the presence, relay information, and implement backdoor access.

You can follow us on LinkedinTwitterFacebook for daily Cybersecurity updates.

Balaji
Balaji
BALAJI is an Ex-Security Researcher (Threat Research Labs) at Comodo Cybersecurity. Editor-in-Chief & Co-Founder - Cyber Security News & GBHackers On Security.

Latest articles

Ivanti Fully Patched Connect Secure RCE Vulnerability That Actively Exploited in the Wild

Ivanti has issued an urgent security advisory for CVE-2025-22457, a critical vulnerability impacting Ivanti...

Beware! Weaponized Job Recruitment Emails Spreading BeaverTail and Tropidoor Malware

A concerning malware campaign was disclosed by the AhnLab Security Intelligence Center (ASEC), revealing...

EncryptHub Ransomware Uncovered Through ChatGPT Use and OPSEC Failures

EncryptHub, a rapidly evolving cybercriminal entity, has come under intense scrutiny following revelations of...

PoisonSeed Targets CRM and Bulk Email Providers in New Supply Chain Phishing Attack

A sophisticated phishing campaign, dubbed "PoisonSeed," has been identified targeting customer relationship management (CRM)...

Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Free Webinar - Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Recent attacks like Polyfill[.]io show how compromised third-party components become backdoors for hackers. PCI DSS 4.0’s Requirement 6.4.3 mandates stricter browser script controls, while Requirement 12.8 focuses on securing third-party providers.

Join Vivekanand Gopalan (VP of Products – Indusface) and Phani Deepak Akella (VP of Marketing – Indusface) as they break down these compliance requirements and share strategies to protect your applications from supply chain attacks.

Discussion points

Meeting PCI DSS 4.0 mandates.
Blocking malicious components and unauthorized JavaScript execution.
PIdentifying attack surfaces from third-party dependencies.
Preventing man-in-the-browser attacks with proactive monitoring.

More like this

Beware! Weaponized Job Recruitment Emails Spreading BeaverTail and Tropidoor Malware

A concerning malware campaign was disclosed by the AhnLab Security Intelligence Center (ASEC), revealing...

Beware of Clickfix: ‘Fix Now’ and ‘Bot Verification’ Lures Deliver and Execute Malware

A sophisticated browser-based malware delivery method, dubbed ClickFix, has emerged as a significant threat...

DeepSeek-R1 Prompts Abused to Generate Advanced Malware and Phishing Sites

The release of DeepSeek-R1, a 671-billion-parameter large language model (LLM), has sparked significant interest...