Tuesday, March 4, 2025
HomeCyber Security NewsHackers Target Job Seekers Using Malicious Microsoft Word Document

Hackers Target Job Seekers Using Malicious Microsoft Word Document

Published on

SIEM as a Service

Follow Us on Google News

Researchers at Cisco Talos revealed a malicious campaign that deploys Cobalt Strike beacons on compromised hosts. The attack involves a multistage and modular infection chain with fileless, malicious scripts.

This attack is a email with a malicious Microsoft Word document attachment which exploits the vulnerability tracked as (CVE-2017-0199), a remote code execution issue in Microsoft Office.

“If a victim opens the maldoc, it downloads a malicious Word document template hosted on an attacker-controlled Bitbucket repository”, Cisco

Cisco Talos analyzed two different attack techniques, both targeting job seekers with malicious documents installing Cobalt Strike.

Initially, the email is themed to lure the recipient to review the attached Word document and give some of their personal information.

Initial malicious email message

Researchers explain that the malicious documents resembles the contents of a declaration form of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM), which serves as the chief human resources agency and personnel policy manager for the U.S. federal government.

US govt-themed phishing lure

In the second case, the malicious document has job offers advertising for roles related to delegating development, PSA plus, a well-known New Zealand trade union and administrative support for National Secretaries at the Public Service Association office based in New Zealand.

Attack Methodologies Employed by the Attacker

In the first attack, the downloaded DOTM template executes an embedded malicious Visual Basic script, leads to the execution of obfuscated VB, PowerShell scripts and malicious VB downloading and running a Windows executable that executes malicious PowerShell commands.

Researchers say “the payload is a leaked version of a Cobalt Strike beacon. The beacon configuration contains commands to perform targeted process injection of arbitrary binaries and has a high reputation domain configured, exhibiting the redirection technique to masquerade the beacon’s traffic”.

Overview of first attack method
First Attack Method

Talos researchers also noticed the usage of the ‘Redline information-stealer’ and ‘Amadey botnet executables’ as payloads.

In the second method, the attack is modular but using less sophisticated Visual Basic and PowerShell scripts. Here, the attacker used a 64-bit Windows executable downloader which executes the PowerShell commands responsible for downloading and running the Cobalt Strike payload.

Second Attack Method

Therefore, defenders should apply behavioral protection capabilities in the organization’s defense to effectively protect them against fileless threats. Organisations should be cautious on the Cobalt Strike beacons and implement layered defense capabilities.

Cyber Attack with Zero Trust Networking – Download Free E-Book

Gurubaran
Gurubaran
Gurubaran is a co-founder of Cyber Security News and GBHackers On Security. He has 10+ years of experience as a Security Consultant, Editor, and Analyst in cybersecurity, technology, and communications.

Latest articles

Hunters International Claims Tata Technologies Cyberattack

Multinational engineering and technology services firm Tata Technologies has reportedly fallen victim to a...

Authorities Seize $31 Million Linked to Crypto Exchange Hack

U.S. authorities announced the seizure of $31 million tied to the 2021 Uranium Finance...

Google, Meta, and Apple Power the World’s Biggest Surveillance System

Imagine a government that tracks your daily movements, monitors your communications, and catalogs your...

Docusnap for Windows Flaw Exposes Sensitive Data to Attackers

A recently disclosed vulnerability in Docusnap's Windows client software (CVE-2025-26849) enables attackers to decrypt...

Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Free Webinar - Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Recent attacks like Polyfill[.]io show how compromised third-party components become backdoors for hackers. PCI DSS 4.0’s Requirement 6.4.3 mandates stricter browser script controls, while Requirement 12.8 focuses on securing third-party providers.

Join Vivekanand Gopalan (VP of Products – Indusface) and Phani Deepak Akella (VP of Marketing – Indusface) as they break down these compliance requirements and share strategies to protect your applications from supply chain attacks.

Discussion points

Meeting PCI DSS 4.0 mandates.
Blocking malicious components and unauthorized JavaScript execution.
PIdentifying attack surfaces from third-party dependencies.
Preventing man-in-the-browser attacks with proactive monitoring.

More like this

Hunters International Claims Tata Technologies Cyberattack

Multinational engineering and technology services firm Tata Technologies has reportedly fallen victim to a...

Authorities Seize $31 Million Linked to Crypto Exchange Hack

U.S. authorities announced the seizure of $31 million tied to the 2021 Uranium Finance...

Google, Meta, and Apple Power the World’s Biggest Surveillance System

Imagine a government that tracks your daily movements, monitors your communications, and catalogs your...