Wednesday, March 12, 2025
HomeCyber Security NewsMedibank Refuses to Pay Ransom - Ransomware Gang Threatens To Release 9.7...

Medibank Refuses to Pay Ransom – Ransomware Gang Threatens To Release 9.7 Million Users Data

Published on

SIEM as a Service

Follow Us on Google News

A ransomware gang threatened to reveal the personal information of millions of Medibank customers after the private health insurance firm declared it will not pay a ransom demand.

Medibank is a leading private health insurer, providing health insurance through our Medibank and ahm brands as well as a range of health services across Australia.

In this case, Medibank declared that no ransom payment will be made to the criminal responsible for this data theft.

The ransomware group threatened to release data purportedly stolen from Medibank’s computers within 24 hours in a new entry uploaded to their data leak website today.

Particularly, the ransomware attack against Australian health insurance firm Medibank Private Limited last month has been attributed to a ransomware group that some believe is a relaunch of REvil and others track as BlogXX.

Data Medibank Believes Was Exposed In the Breach

  • Name, date of birth, address, phone number, and email address for approximately 9.7 million current and former customers and authorized representatives
  • Medicare numbers (but not expiry dates) for ahm health insurance (ahm) customers
  • Passport numbers (but not expiry dates) and visa details for international student customers 
  • Health claims data for roughly 480,000 Medibank, ahm, and international customers
  • Health provider details, including names, provider numbers, and addresses

Medibank has issued a warning to customers, stating “criminals could also attempt to contact [them] directly”.

According to the firm, it is collaborating with the Australian Federal Police and the Australian Cyber Security Centre to look into cybercrime and try to stop the sharing and sale of Medibank customers’ data.

“Today, we’ve announced that no ransom payment will be made to the criminal responsible for this data theft,” Medibank said.

“Based on the extensive advice we have received from cybercrime experts we believe there is only a limited chance paying a ransom would ensure the return of our customers’ data and prevent it from being published.”

Further, the firm said that paying the attackers would probably encourage them to target clients who had their data compromised.

“There is a strong chance that paying puts more people in harm’s way by making Australia a bigger target,” the company said. 

“This decision is consistent with the position of the Australian Government.”

Reports say attackers have not gained access to financial information (credit card and banking details), primary identity documents (e.g., driver’s licenses), or health claims data for extras services (like dental, physio, optical, and psychology).

Customers Should be Alert to all Online Communications & Transactions:

  • Be alert for any phishing scams via phone, post, or email;
  • Verify any communications received to ensure they are legitimate;
  • Do not open texts from unknown or suspicious numbers; and
  • Change passwords regularly with ‘strong’ passwords, and use multi-factor authentications on any online accounts where available.

Network Security Checklist – Download Free E-Book

Gurubaran
Gurubaran
Gurubaran is a co-founder of Cyber Security News and GBHackers On Security. He has 10+ years of experience as a Security Consultant, Editor, and Analyst in cybersecurity, technology, and communications.

Latest articles

Threat Actors Evade Security Measures to Launch SIM Swap Attacks

SIM swapping fraud continues to pose a significant threat to individuals and financial institutions,...

Ebyte Ransomware Targets Windows Users with Advanced Encryption Techniques

A new ransomware variant, known as Ebyte Ransomware, has emerged as a significant threat...

macOS NULL Pointer Dereference Vulnerability Allow Attackers Exploits Kernel

Historically, NULL pointer dereferences have been a significant vulnerability in operating systems, including macOS....

Apache Camel Vulnerability Allows Attackers to Inject Arbitrary Headers

A newly disclosed security vulnerability in Apache Camel, tracked as CVE-2025-27636, has raised alarms across...

Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Free Webinar - Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Recent attacks like Polyfill[.]io show how compromised third-party components become backdoors for hackers. PCI DSS 4.0’s Requirement 6.4.3 mandates stricter browser script controls, while Requirement 12.8 focuses on securing third-party providers.

Join Vivekanand Gopalan (VP of Products – Indusface) and Phani Deepak Akella (VP of Marketing – Indusface) as they break down these compliance requirements and share strategies to protect your applications from supply chain attacks.

Discussion points

Meeting PCI DSS 4.0 mandates.
Blocking malicious components and unauthorized JavaScript execution.
PIdentifying attack surfaces from third-party dependencies.
Preventing man-in-the-browser attacks with proactive monitoring.

More like this

Threat Actors Evade Security Measures to Launch SIM Swap Attacks

SIM swapping fraud continues to pose a significant threat to individuals and financial institutions,...

Ebyte Ransomware Targets Windows Users with Advanced Encryption Techniques

A new ransomware variant, known as Ebyte Ransomware, has emerged as a significant threat...

macOS NULL Pointer Dereference Vulnerability Allow Attackers Exploits Kernel

Historically, NULL pointer dereferences have been a significant vulnerability in operating systems, including macOS....