Tuesday, July 16, 2024
EHA

New 16 High-Severity UEFI Firmware Bugs Uncovered in Millions of HP Devices

The cybersecurity analysts at HP have recently revealed 16 high-severity UEFI firmware bugs in millions of HP devices. And by exploiting these vulnerabilities a threat actor can gain high privileges on the affected devices, and not only that even also allow the attacker to evade AV tools and remain undetectable.

All these bugs have affected multiple HP models from different segments like:-

  • HP laptops
  • HP desktop computers
  • HP PoS systems
  • HP edge computing nodes

While these 16 high-severity UEFI firmware bugs were discovered by the security experts at Binarly security firm.

Here’s what the Founder and CEO of Binarly, Alex Matrosov stated:-

“Binarly believes that the lack of a knowledge base of common firmware exploitation techniques and primitives related to UEFI firmware makes these failures repeatable for the entire industry. We are working hard to fill this gap by providing comprehensive technical details in our advisories. This knowledge base is crucial for developing effective mitigations and defense technologies for device security”

Vulnerabilities

After the discovery of these severe vulnerabilities, Binarly is collaborated with several security teams including HP’s and CERT/CC’s to understand the impact and scope for each of the vulnerabilities to mitigate them and protect the enterprise infrastructures globally.

Here we have listed all the 16 high-severity UEFI firmware bugs below:-

  1. CVE-2021-39297: It’s a DXE stack buffer overflow (arbitrary code execution) flaw with a CVSS score of 7.7.
  2. CVE-2021-39298: It’s an SMM callout (privilege escalation) flaw with a CVSS score of 8.8.
  3. CVE-2021-39299: It’s a DXE stack buffer overflow (arbitrary code execution) flaw with a CVSS score of 8.2.
  4. CVE-2021-39300: It’s a DXE stack overflow vulnerability (arbitrary code execution) flaw with a CVSS score of 8.2.
  5. CVE-2021-39301: It’s a DXE stack overflow (arbitrary code execution) flaw with a CVSS score of 7.7.
  6. CVE-2022-23924: It’s an SMM heap buffer overflow (arbitrary code execution) flaw with a CVSS score of 8.2.
  7. CVE-2022-23925: It’s an SMM memory corruption (arbitrary code execution) flaw with a CVSS score of 8.2.
  8. CVE-2022-23926: It’s an SMM memory corruption (arbitrary code execution) flaw with a CVSS score of 8.2.
  9. CVE-2022-23927: It’s an SMM memory corruption (arbitrary code execution) flaw with a CVSS score of 8.2.
  10. CVE-2022-23928: It’s an SMM memory corruption (arbitrary code execution) flaw with a CVSS score of 8.2.
  11. CVE-2022-23929: It’s an SMM memory corruption (arbitrary code execution) flaw with a CVSS score of 8.2.
  12. CVE-2022-23930: It’s an SMM memory corruption (arbitrary code execution) flaw with a CVSS score of 8.2.
  13. CVE-2022-23931: It’s an SMM memory corruption (arbitrary code execution) flaw with a CVSS score of 8.2.
  14. CVE-2022-23932: It’s an SMM callout (privilege escalation) flaw with a CVSS score of 8.2.
  15. CVE-2022-23933: It’s an SMM callout (privilege escalation) flaw with a CVSS score of 8.2.
  16. CVE-2022-23934: It’s an SMM memory corruption (arbitrary code execution) flaw with a CVSS score of 8.2.

Exploitation

By exploiting these above-mentioned security flaws, an attacker can perform:- 

  • Privileged code execution in the firmware of affected devices.
  • Code execution below the operating system.
  • Deliver persistent malicious code that endures OS re-installations.
  • Bypass of endpoint security solutions (EDR/AV).
  • Bypass of Secure Boot.
  • Bypass of Virtualization-Based Security isolation.

Apart from this, the consequences of third-party risks from known vulnerabilities are commonly undervalued by several device manufacturers and firmware development companies.

But, the current discovery and data depict that the scenario is completely different from the assumed one. As there are many vendors who have not yet patched several know vulnerabilities.

You can follow us on LinkedinTwitterFacebook for daily Cybersecurity and hacking news updates.

Website

Latest articles

Critical Cellopoint Secure Email Gateway Flaw Let Attackers Execute Arbitrary Code

A critical vulnerability has been discovered in the Cellopoint Secure Email Gateway, identified as...

Singapore Banks to Phase out OTPs for Bank Account Logins Within 3 Months

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) and The Association of Banks in Singapore (ABS)...

GuardZoo Android Malware Attacking military personnel via WhatsApp To Steal Sensitive Data

A Houthi-aligned group has been deploying Android surveillanceware called GuardZoo since October 2019 to...

ViperSoftX Weaponizing AutoIt & CLR For Stealthy PowerShell Execution

ViperSoftX is an advanced malware that has become more complicated since its recognition in...

Malicious NuGet Campaign Tricking Developers To Inject Malicious Code

Hackers often target NuGet as it's a popular package manager for .NET, which developers...

Akira Ransomware Attacking Airline Industry With Legitimate Tools

Airlines often become the target of hackers as they contain sensitive personal and financial...

DarkGate Malware Exploiting Excel Files And SMB File Shares

DarkGate, a Malware-as-a-Service (MaaS) platform, experienced a surge in activity since September 2023, employing...

Free Webinar

Low Rate DDoS Attack

9 of 10 sites on the AppTrana network have faced a DDoS attack in the last 30 days.
Some DDoS attacks could readily be blocked by rate-limiting, IP reputation checks and other basic mitigation methods.
More than 50% of the DDoS attacks are employing botnets to send slow DDoS attacks where millions of IPs are being employed to send one or two requests per minute..
Key takeaways include:

  • The mechanics of a low-DDoS attack
  • Fundamentals of behavioural AI and rate-limiting
  • Surgical mitigation actions to minimize false positives
  • Role of managed services in DDoS monitoring

Related Articles