Thursday, February 20, 2025
HomeCyber Security NewsOpenSSL Flaw Would Allow Attackers to Cause a denial-of-service Condition

OpenSSL Flaw Would Allow Attackers to Cause a denial-of-service Condition

Published on

SIEM as a Service

Follow Us on Google News

OpenSSL has released a Security Advisory [on 8th of December 2020] regarding the vulnerability CVE-2020-1971 which is called EDIPARTYNAME NULL pointer de-reference.

What is the vulnerability?

X.509 digital certificate’s GeneralName type is a generic type for representing different types of names. One of those name types is known as EDIPartyName.

OpenSSL’s function GENERAL_NAME_cmp compares different instances of a GENERAL_NAME to see if they are equal or not.

It is found that this operation malfunctions when both GENERAL_NAMEs contain an EDIPARTYNAME. A NULL pointer de-reference and a crash may occur leading to a possible denial of service attack which is illustrated in gbhackers.

Risk assignment:

If an attacker controls the functions of the GENERAL_NAME_cmp, he can crash the entire system.

This GENERAL_NAME_cmp is used for the below two main purposes:

1) GENERAL_NAME_cmp compares the CRL distribution point names between an available CRL and a CRL (where CRL is the Certificate Revocation list)distribution point embedded in an X509 certificate

2) GENERAL_NAME_cmp verifies whether a timestamp response token signer matches the timestamp authority name (exposed via the API functions TS_RESP_verify_response and TS_RESP_verify_token)

Suppose if the attacker tricks a client machine or a server machine to check for a malicious certificate against a malicious CRL, then Attacker can exploit this and cause denial of service attack . It is also to be noted that some applications automatically download CRLs based on a URL embedded in a certificate. OpenSSL’s s_server, s_client and verify tools have support for the “-crl_download” option which implements automatic CRL downloading and this attack has been demonstrated to work against those tools.

Affected versions:

  • OpenSSL 1.1.1 and 1.0.2
  • This is not yet tested on the unsupported versions yet

Proposed advise:

  • OpenSSL 1.1.1 users are advised to upgrade to 1.1.1i with immediate effect.
  • Premium support customers of OpenSSL 1.0.2 have been asked to upgrade to 1.0.2x also other users are requested to upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1i right away.
Gurubaran
Gurubaran
Gurubaran is a co-founder of Cyber Security News and GBHackers On Security. He has 10+ years of experience as a Security Consultant, Editor, and Analyst in cybersecurity, technology, and communications.

Latest articles

Russian Hackers Target Signal Messenger Users to Steal Sensitive Data

Russian state-aligned threat actors have intensified their efforts to compromise Signal Messenger accounts, targeting...

Hackers Exploit Jarsigner Tool to Deploy XLoader Malware

Security researchers at AhnLab Security Intelligence Center (ASEC) have uncovered a new campaign leveraging...

Hackers Converting Stolen Payment Card Data into Apple & Google Wallets

Cybercriminal groups, primarily based in China, are leveraging advanced phishing techniques and mobile wallet...

Snake Keylogger Targets Chrome, Edge, and Firefox Users in New Attack Campaign

A new variant of the Snake Keylogger, also known as 404 Keylogger, has been...

Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Free Webinar - Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Recent attacks like Polyfill[.]io show how compromised third-party components become backdoors for hackers. PCI DSS 4.0’s Requirement 6.4.3 mandates stricter browser script controls, while Requirement 12.8 focuses on securing third-party providers.

Join Vivekanand Gopalan (VP of Products – Indusface) and Phani Deepak Akella (VP of Marketing – Indusface) as they break down these compliance requirements and share strategies to protect your applications from supply chain attacks.

Discussion points

Meeting PCI DSS 4.0 mandates.
Blocking malicious components and unauthorized JavaScript execution.
PIdentifying attack surfaces from third-party dependencies.
Preventing man-in-the-browser attacks with proactive monitoring.

More like this

Russian Hackers Target Signal Messenger Users to Steal Sensitive Data

Russian state-aligned threat actors have intensified their efforts to compromise Signal Messenger accounts, targeting...

Hackers Exploit Jarsigner Tool to Deploy XLoader Malware

Security researchers at AhnLab Security Intelligence Center (ASEC) have uncovered a new campaign leveraging...

Hackers Converting Stolen Payment Card Data into Apple & Google Wallets

Cybercriminal groups, primarily based in China, are leveraging advanced phishing techniques and mobile wallet...