Thursday, February 27, 2025
HomeOWASP - Top 10OWASP A10-Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards

OWASP A10-Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards

Published on

SIEM as a Service

Follow Us on Google News

Web applications often redirect and forward users to other pages and websites, and use untrusted data to determine the destination pages.

Without proper validation, attackers can redirect victims to phishing or malware sites, or use forwards to use unauthorized pages.

Sometime, your application may need to redirect to another area by sending a redirect header to the customer in an HTTP response.This method found in applications that divert after an successful  verification.

The redirection will be in the login form or the URL. both of which can be messed with by the client.Such redirects may attempt to install malware or trick victims into revealing passwords or other delicate data. Risky forwards may permit get to control bypass.

Developers can prevent the weakness by approving client input and furthermore confirming the URL being referred to is really an endorsed target URL.

You can use a guide map technique where URLs are mapped to names, for example, landing page, item pages, or stock page. This would keep clients from providing an invalid URL.

How to check for invalidated Redirects and Forwards?

  • Spider the site to see if it generates any redirects (HTTP response codes 300-307, typically 302). Look at the parameters supplied prior to the redirect to see if they seem to be a target URL or a piece of such a URL. If so, change the URL target and see whether the site redirects to the new target.
  • Check the code for all users of redirect or forward (called a move in .NET). For every use, distinguish if the objective URL is incorporated into any parameter values. Provided that this is true, if the objective URL isn’t approved against a white list, you are vulnerable.
  • If code is unavailable, check all parameters to see if they look like part of a redirect or forward URL destination and test those that do.

How to Test?

This vulnerability occurs when an application accepts untrusted input that has an URL value without sanitizing it.

This URL value could cause the web application to redirect the user to another page as, for example, a malicious page controlled by the attacker.

By modifying untrusted URL input to a malicious site, an attacker may successfully launch a phishing scam and steal user credentials.

Since the redirection is originated by the real application, the phishing attempts may have a more trustworthy appearance.

A phishing attack example could be the following:

http://www.testdomain.com?#redirect=www.fake-target.site

If the application uses forwards to route requests between different parts of the site. To facilitate this, some pages use a parameter to indicate where the user should be sent if a transaction is successful.

In this case, the attacker crafts a URL that will pass the application’s access control check and then forwards the attacker to administrative functionality for which the attacker isn’t authorized.

http://www.example.com/boring.jsp?fwd=admin.jsp

Impact on Website

• Lack of End User Trust
• Lack of Credibility
• Malware Installation
• Worm Infections

Common Defences

  • Destination parameters can’t be avoided, ensure that the supplied value is valid, and authorized for the user.
  • Simply avoid using redirects and forwards.

Reference: https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Top_10_2013-A10-Unvalidated_Redirects_and_Forwards

Also Read:

Gurubaran
Gurubaran
Gurubaran is a co-founder of Cyber Security News and GBHackers On Security. He has 10+ years of experience as a Security Consultant, Editor, and Analyst in cybersecurity, technology, and communications.

Latest articles

Silver Fox APT Hackers Target Healthcare Services to Steal Sensitive Data

A sophisticated cyber campaign orchestrated by the Chinese Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) group, Silver...

Ghostwriter Malware Targets Government Organizations with Weaponized XLS File

A new wave of cyberattacks attributed to the Ghostwriter Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) group...

LCRYX Ransomware Attacks Windows Machines by Blocking Registry Editor and Task Manager

The LCRYX ransomware, a malicious VBScript-based threat, has re-emerged in February 2025 after its...

Threat Actors Using Ephemeral Port 60102 for Covert Malware Communications

Recent cybersecurity investigations have uncovered a sophisticated technique employed by threat actors to evade...

Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Free Webinar - Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Recent attacks like Polyfill[.]io show how compromised third-party components become backdoors for hackers. PCI DSS 4.0’s Requirement 6.4.3 mandates stricter browser script controls, while Requirement 12.8 focuses on securing third-party providers.

Join Vivekanand Gopalan (VP of Products – Indusface) and Phani Deepak Akella (VP of Marketing – Indusface) as they break down these compliance requirements and share strategies to protect your applications from supply chain attacks.

Discussion points

Meeting PCI DSS 4.0 mandates.
Blocking malicious components and unauthorized JavaScript execution.
PIdentifying attack surfaces from third-party dependencies.
Preventing man-in-the-browser attacks with proactive monitoring.

More like this

OWASP Smart Contract Top 10 2025 Released – What’s new!

The Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP) has released its updated Smart Contract Top 10 for...

What is XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)? – A Detailed Understanding Of the Type of XSS

XSS is a very commonly exploited vulnerability type that is very widely spread and...

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) – An OWASP Vulnerability – Detailed Explanation

Cross Site Request Forgery is one of the most common form of attack by...