Sunday, March 9, 2025
HomeCyber Security NewsHundreds of Poorly Secured Elasticsearch Database Targeted in Ransom Attacks

Hundreds of Poorly Secured Elasticsearch Database Targeted in Ransom Attacks

Published on

SIEM as a Service

Follow Us on Google News

In a recently discovered malicious campaign, Hackers have targeted 450 Elasticsearch indexes that have been replaced with ransom notes as a result of poorly secured databases. 

In those ransom notes, hackers have demanded $620 to restore each index. In short, the total amount required amount that is demanded to restore everything is $279,000.

This malicious campaign was discovered by the security experts of Secureworks security firm. Over 450 requests for ransom payments were identified by Secureworks’ cybersecurity analysts. 

In addition to setting a deadline for the payments, the threat actors threatened to double the amount if it was not paid in seven days. There is a possibility that the victims would lose their indexes if another week passes without receiving a paycheck.

Once payment is received, those who have paid the amount will be provided with a link to download their database. This link is said to help restore the data structure to its original form as soon as possible so that all of the data can be restored.

Ransom note

In exchange for access to the data, the note requests a payment of Bitcoin. There are a number of Elasticsearch indexes that exist on various versions of Elasticsearch and access to the indexes is not authenticated. 

The ransom notes were then stored as a feature in the ‘message’ field of an index that is known as ‘read_me_to_recover_database’, replacing the data stored in the databases.

More than 1,200 Elasticsearch databases containing the ransom note were discovered by researchers at CTU. 

Since the maximum number of the affected databases were hosted on cloud computing networks operated by cloud computing companies, it is not possible to determine the actual number of victims.

While the ransom payment is comparatively low according to the campaign size. There is no evidence that either wallet contained funds related to the ransomware and neither wallet appeared to have been used by the threat actor to transact any funds.

Campaign Outcomes

Similarly opportunistic attacks have occurred in the past and against other databases as well. To put it crudely, this type of malicious campaign is nothing new.

It is highly unlikely that the hackers will restore the contents of the database by paying them. Since the attacker would have a difficult and expensive time storing the data of so many databases, this isn’t a practical or economical solution.

Moreover, the security researchers have only tracked one bitcoin wallet address having received a payment on the Bitcoin ransom notes till now.

Several security mechanisms have to be implemented by organizations in order to ensure the integrity of internet-facing services and databases. 

One of the things that can be used for securing a database when remote access is needed, “multi-factor authentication” (MFA). 

As well as reviewing cloud providers’ security policies, it is important for companies to remember that data that is stored in the cloud is not automatically secured.

You can follow us on LinkedinTwitterFacebook for daily Cybersecurity and hacking news updates.

Gurubaran
Gurubaran
Gurubaran is a co-founder of Cyber Security News and GBHackers On Security. He has 10+ years of experience as a Security Consultant, Editor, and Analyst in cybersecurity, technology, and communications.

Latest articles

10 Best Penetration Testing Companies in 2025

Penetration testing companies play a vital role in strengthening the cybersecurity defenses of organizations...

Lumma Stealer Using Fake Google Meet & Windows Update Sites to Launch “Click Fix” Style Attack

Cybersecurity researchers continue to track sophisticated "Click Fix" style distribution campaigns that deliver the...

Fake BianLian Ransom Demands Sent via Physical Letters to U.S. Firms

In a novel and concerning development, multiple U.S. organizations have reported receiving suspicious physical...

Strela Stealer Malware Attack Microsoft Outlook Users for Credential Theft

The cybersecurity landscape has recently been impacted by the emergence of the Strela Stealer...

Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Free Webinar - Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Recent attacks like Polyfill[.]io show how compromised third-party components become backdoors for hackers. PCI DSS 4.0’s Requirement 6.4.3 mandates stricter browser script controls, while Requirement 12.8 focuses on securing third-party providers.

Join Vivekanand Gopalan (VP of Products – Indusface) and Phani Deepak Akella (VP of Marketing – Indusface) as they break down these compliance requirements and share strategies to protect your applications from supply chain attacks.

Discussion points

Meeting PCI DSS 4.0 mandates.
Blocking malicious components and unauthorized JavaScript execution.
PIdentifying attack surfaces from third-party dependencies.
Preventing man-in-the-browser attacks with proactive monitoring.

More like this

10 Best Penetration Testing Companies in 2025

Penetration testing companies play a vital role in strengthening the cybersecurity defenses of organizations...

Lumma Stealer Using Fake Google Meet & Windows Update Sites to Launch “Click Fix” Style Attack

Cybersecurity researchers continue to track sophisticated "Click Fix" style distribution campaigns that deliver the...

Fake BianLian Ransom Demands Sent via Physical Letters to U.S. Firms

In a novel and concerning development, multiple U.S. organizations have reported receiving suspicious physical...