Wednesday, March 5, 2025
Homecyber securityPython Developers Beware! Russian Hackers Targeting You With Malicious Packages

Python Developers Beware! Russian Hackers Targeting You With Malicious Packages

Published on

SIEM as a Service

Follow Us on Google News

A malicious Python package named “crytic-compilers” was identified on PyPI.

Masquerading as a legitimate library for intelligent contract compilation, it mimicked the name and versioning scheme of the real “crytic-compile” tool. 

The imposter package infiltrated popular development environments by appearing to offer desired functionality, as it harbored a hidden payload that stole cryptocurrency from infected systems. 

Although the package garnered 436 downloads before its takedown, which highlights the vulnerability of relying solely on open-source components without proper vetting. 

installing the real library ('crytic-compile') to avoid suspicion
installing the real library (‘crytic-compile’) to avoid suspicion

A counterfeit Python library, “crytic-compilers”, is designed to exploit developers by mimicking the legitimate “crytic-compile” library, which uses similar names and aligns version numbers (0.3.8 to 0.3.11) with appearing as a newer version. 

Analyze any MaliciousURL, Files & Emails & Configuration With ANY RUN Start your Analysis

Some versions even attempt to install the actual library to deflect suspicion.

The malicious intent is revealed in version 0.3.11, which targets Windows systems and executes a hidden program (s.exe). 

The strategy leverages the popularity of “crytic-compile” (170,000 monthly downloads, 141 GitHub stars) to infiltrate unsuspecting projects in the cryptocurrency development community. 

 illicit component's 0.3.11 version
 illicit component’s 0.3.11 version

Lumma, a Russia-linked C2 trojan, targets Windows users by stealing crypto wallets and browser passwords. ]

The malware, disguised as an executable file (s.exe), uses anti-detection techniques to avoid being caught. 

It connects to a list of domains (IOCs) with active “/api” endpoints, most likely Lumma C2 servers, registered on Namecheap and secured by Cloudflare, making takedown attempts more challenging. 

According to SonaType, geo-blocking also prevents users from accessing these domains from restricted regions.   

Verification Captcha
Verification Captcha

Lumma Stealer, a C-based Windows trojan targeting cryptocurrency wallets and browser extensions, has been distributed through various channels since at least 2022. 

Primarily offered as Malware-as-a-Service on Russian dark web forums, Lumma has reappeared in trojanized apps, phishing emails, and pirated games with cheats. 

Most recently, drive-by downloads on compromised websites disguised as fake browser updates have been used to deliver Lumma stealers. 

Looking for Full Data Breach Protection? Try Cynet's All-in-One Cybersecurity Platform for MSPs: Try Free Demo

Eswar
Eswar
Eswar is a Cyber security content editor with a passion for creating captivating and informative content. With years of experience under his belt in Cyber Security, he is covering Cyber Security News, technology and other news.

Latest articles

Pathfinder AI – Hunters Announces New AI Capabilities for Smarter SOC Automation

Pathfinder AI expands Hunters' vision for AI-driven SOCs, introducing Agentic AI for autonomous investigation...

Google Secretly Tracks Android Devices Even Without User-Opened Apps

A recent technical study conducted by researchers at Trinity College Dublin has revealed that...

LLMjacking – Hackers Abuse GenAI With AWS NHIs to Hijack Cloud LLMs

In a concerning development, cybercriminals are increasingly targeting cloud-based generative AI (GenAI) services in...

Microsoft Strengthens Trust Boundary for VBS Enclaves

Microsoft has introduced a series of technical recommendations to bolster the security of Virtualization-Based...

Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Free Webinar - Supply Chain Attack Prevention

Recent attacks like Polyfill[.]io show how compromised third-party components become backdoors for hackers. PCI DSS 4.0’s Requirement 6.4.3 mandates stricter browser script controls, while Requirement 12.8 focuses on securing third-party providers.

Join Vivekanand Gopalan (VP of Products – Indusface) and Phani Deepak Akella (VP of Marketing – Indusface) as they break down these compliance requirements and share strategies to protect your applications from supply chain attacks.

Discussion points

Meeting PCI DSS 4.0 mandates.
Blocking malicious components and unauthorized JavaScript execution.
PIdentifying attack surfaces from third-party dependencies.
Preventing man-in-the-browser attacks with proactive monitoring.

More like this

Pathfinder AI – Hunters Announces New AI Capabilities for Smarter SOC Automation

Pathfinder AI expands Hunters' vision for AI-driven SOCs, introducing Agentic AI for autonomous investigation...

Google Secretly Tracks Android Devices Even Without User-Opened Apps

A recent technical study conducted by researchers at Trinity College Dublin has revealed that...

LLMjacking – Hackers Abuse GenAI With AWS NHIs to Hijack Cloud LLMs

In a concerning development, cybercriminals are increasingly targeting cloud-based generative AI (GenAI) services in...